Literature DB >> 19047882

Acceptability of an Electronic Self-Report Assessment Program for patients with cancer.

Seth Wolpin1, Donna Berry, Mary Austin-Seymour, Nigel Bush, Jesse R Fann, Barbara Halpenny, William B Lober, Ruth McCorkle.   

Abstract

Eliciting symptom and quality of life information from patients is an important component of medical and nursing care processes. Traditionally, this information has been collected with paper and pencil. However, this approach presents several barriers, including delays in receiving information, difficulty in integrating responses with electronic records, and the time required to manually score questionnaires for measurement purposes. One solution that addresses many of these barriers is the adoption of computerized screening for symptom and quality-of-life information. This research explored the acceptability of asking symptom and quality-of-life questions using the Electronic Self Report Assessment-Cancer program on wireless laptops equipped with touch-screen format. Acceptability data were explored with respect to whether any differences may be attributed to demographics and symptom and quality-of-life levels, such as depression and cognitive and emotional functioning. This evaluation used descriptive and univariate statistics to examine data from 342 participants from the ongoing ESRA-C randomized clinical trial. Research participants for the ESRA-C study were recruited from the Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, a consortium among the University of Washington Medical Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, and Children's Hospital and Regional Medical Center in Seattle, WA. The sample consisted of 342 adult participants who completed both baseline and follow-up survey sessions. Medical oncology represented the largest recruitment group (45.3%), followed by stem cell transplant (34.5%) and radiation oncology (20.2%). The primary finding was that patients were generally able to use ESRA-C quickly and without difficulty in a real-world clinical setting and that they were overall quite satisfied with the ESRA-C program. Significant differences were found in several acceptability areas with respect to demographics and quality of life measures such as age, sex, and severe distress. This analysis confirms that the ESRA-C application for collecting symptom and quality of life information is easy for patients to use and acceptable across a range of user characteristics. We intend to build on our work by using the survey platform in other modalities while ensuring that the patient's preferences are considered at all times.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19047882      PMCID: PMC3189855          DOI: 10.1097/01.NCN.0000336464.79692.6a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Inform Nurs        ISSN: 1538-2931            Impact factor:   1.985


  10 in total

1.  A user-centered model for web site design: needs assessment, user interface design, and rapid prototyping.

Authors:  Mable B Kinzie; Wendy F Cohn; Marti F Julian; William A Knaus
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Development of a symptom distress scale.

Authors:  R McCorkle; K Young
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 2.592

3.  Distributed health assessment and intervention research software framework.

Authors:  M R Dockrey; W B Lober; S E Wolpin; L J Rae; D L Berry
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2005

4.  Computerized quality-of-life screening in a cancer pain clinic.

Authors:  L E Carlson; M Speca; N Hagen; P Taenzer
Journal:  J Palliat Care       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.250

5.  Acceptability of an Internet treatment decision support program for men with prostate cancer.

Authors:  L J Rae; W B Lober; S E Wolpin; M R Dockrey; W J Ellis; D L Berry
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2005

6.  The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure.

Authors:  K Kroenke; R L Spitzer; J B Williams
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  A computer-based medical-history system.

Authors:  W V Slack; G P Hicks; C E Reed; L J Van Cura
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1966-01-27       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology.

Authors:  N K Aaronson; S Ahmedzai; B Bergman; M Bullinger; A Cull; N J Duez; A Filiberti; H Flechtner; S B Fleishman; J C de Haes
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1993-03-03       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Computerized symptom and quality-of-life assessment for patients with cancer part II: acceptability and usability.

Authors:  Kristin H Mullen; Donna L Berry; Brenda K Zierler
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2004-09-17       Impact factor: 2.172

10.  Computer-based quality of life questionnaires may contribute to doctor-patient interactions in oncology.

Authors:  G Velikova; J M Brown; A B Smith; P J Selby
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2002-01-07       Impact factor: 7.640

  10 in total
  20 in total

1.  Enhancing patient-provider communication with the electronic self-report assessment for cancer: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Donna L Berry; Brent A Blumenstein; Barbara Halpenny; Seth Wolpin; Jesse R Fann; Mary Austin-Seymour; Nigel Bush; Bryant T Karras; William B Lober; Ruth McCorkle
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Validation and testing of the Acceptability E-scale for web-based patient-reported outcomes in cancer care.

Authors:  Joseph D Tariman; Donna L Berry; Barbara Halpenny; Seth Wolpin; Karen Schepp
Journal:  Appl Nurs Res       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 2.257

3.  Development and usability testing of a web-based cancer symptom and quality-of-life support intervention.

Authors:  S E Wolpin; B Halpenny; G Whitman; J McReynolds; M Stewart; W B Lober; D L Berry
Journal:  Health Informatics J       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 2.681

4.  Monitoring symptoms at home: what methods would cancer patients be comfortable using?

Authors:  Annet Kleiboer; Katie Gowing; Christian Holm Hansen; Carina Hibberd; Laura Hodges; Jane Walker; Parvez Thekkumpurath; Mark O'Connor; Gordon Murray; Michael Sharpe
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Effects of a computer-supported interactive tailored patient assessment tool on patient care, symptom distress, and patients' need for symptom management support: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Cornelia M Ruland; Harald H Holte; Jo Røislien; Cathy Heaven; Glenys A Hamilton; Jørn Kristiansen; Heidi Sandbaek; Stein O Kvaløy; Line Hasund; Misoo C Ellison
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  Physicians' Use of Patients' Daily Reports of Quality of Life to Evaluate Treatment Response in Phase I Cancer Trials.

Authors:  Felicity W K Harper; Elisabeth I Heath; Marci E J Gleason; Louis Penner; Patricia Lorusso; Ding Wang; Terrance L Albrecht
Journal:  J Cancer Ther       Date:  2012-10

7.  Technology and quality of life outcomes.

Authors:  Eileen Danaher Hacker
Journal:  Semin Oncol Nurs       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.315

8.  Depression screening using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 administered on a touch screen computer.

Authors:  Jesse R Fann; Donna L Berry; Seth Wolpin; Mary Austin-Seymour; Nigel Bush; Barbara Halpenny; William B Lober; Ruth McCorkle
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.894

9.  Electronic patient self-assessment and management (SAM): a novel framework for cancer survivorship.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; Talya Salz; Ethan Basch; Matthew R Cooperberg; Peter R Carroll; Foss Tighe; James Eastham; Raymond C Rosen
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 2.796

10.  "The More They Know, the Better Care They Can Give": Patient Perspectives on Measuring Functional Status in Primary Care.

Authors:  Francesca M Nicosia; Malena J Spar; Alicia Neumann; Molly C Silvestrini; Maureen Barrientos; Rebecca T Brown
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.