Literature DB >> 21282548

Enhancing patient-provider communication with the electronic self-report assessment for cancer: a randomized trial.

Donna L Berry1, Brent A Blumenstein, Barbara Halpenny, Seth Wolpin, Jesse R Fann, Mary Austin-Seymour, Nigel Bush, Bryant T Karras, William B Lober, Ruth McCorkle.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Although patient-reported cancer symptoms and quality-of-life issues (SQLIs) have been promoted as essential to a comprehensive assessment, efficient and efficacious methods have not been widely tested in clinical settings. The purpose of this trial was to determine the effect of the Electronic Self-Report Assessment-Cancer (ESRA-C) on the likelihood of SQLIs discussed between clinicians and patients with cancer in ambulatory clinic visits. Secondary objectives included comparison of visit duration between groups and usefulness of the ESRA-C as reported by clinicians. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This randomized controlled trial was conducted in 660 patients with various cancer diagnoses and stages at two institutions of a comprehensive cancer center. Patient-reported SQLIs were automatically displayed on a graphical summary and provided to the clinical team before an on-treatment visit (n = 327); in the control group, no summary was provided (n = 333). SQLIs were scored for level of severity or distress. One on-treatment clinic visit was audio recorded for each participant and then scored for discussion of each SQLI. We hypothesized that problematic SQLIs would be discussed more often when the intervention was delivered to the clinicians.
RESULTS: The likelihood of SQLIs being discussed differed by randomized group and depended on whether an SQLI was first reported as problematic (P = .032). Clinic visits were similar with regard to duration between groups, and clinicians reported the summary as useful.
CONCLUSION: The ESRA-C is the first electronic self-report application to increase discussion of SQLIs in a US randomized clinical trial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21282548      PMCID: PMC3068053          DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2010.30.3909

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  18 in total

1.  Electronic Self-report Assessment--Cancer (ESRA-C): Working towards an integrated survey system.

Authors:  Bryant T Karras; Seth Wolpin; William B Lober; Nigel Bush; Jesse R Fann; Donna L Berry
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2006

2.  Computerized quality-of-life screening in a cancer pain clinic.

Authors:  L E Carlson; M Speca; N Hagen; P Taenzer
Journal:  J Palliat Care       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.250

3.  Health-related quality-of-life assessments and patient-physician communication: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Symone B Detmar; Martin J Muller; Jan H Schornagel; Lidwina D V Wever; Neil K Aaronson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-12-18       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 4.  Patient-physician communication in oncology: what does the evidence show?

Authors:  Anthony Back
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.990

Review 5.  Barriers to cancer pain management: a review of empirical research.

Authors:  Ramune Jacobsen; Zita Liubarskiene; Claus Møldrup; Lona Christrup; Per Sjøgren; Jurgita Samsanaviciene
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.430

6.  Adverse symptom event reporting by patients vs clinicians: relationships with clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Ethan Basch; Xiaoyu Jia; Glenn Heller; Allison Barz; Laura Sit; Michael Fruscione; Mark Appawu; Alexia Iasonos; Thomas Atkinson; Shari Goldfarb; Ann Culkin; Mark G Kris; Deborah Schrag
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Computerized symptom and quality-of-life assessment for patients with cancer part II: acceptability and usability.

Authors:  Kristin H Mullen; Donna L Berry; Brenda K Zierler
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2004-09-17       Impact factor: 2.172

8.  Computerized symptom and quality-of-life assessment for patients with cancer part I: development and pilot testing.

Authors:  Donna L Berry; Lisa J Trigg; William B Lober; Bryant T Karras; Mary L Galligan; Mary Austin-Seymour; Stephanie Martin
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2004-09-17       Impact factor: 2.172

9.  Measuring quality of life in routine oncology practice improves communication and patient well-being: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Galina Velikova; Laura Booth; Adam B Smith; Paul M Brown; Pamela Lynch; Julia M Brown; Peter J Selby
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-02-15       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Guidance for industry: patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims: draft guidance.

Authors: 
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2006-10-11       Impact factor: 3.186

View more
  122 in total

1.  Identifying changes in scores on the EORTC-QLQ-C30 representing a change in patients' supportive care needs.

Authors:  Claire F Snyder; Amanda L Blackford; Jonathan Sussman; Daryl Bainbridge; Doris Howell; Hsien Y Seow; Michael A Carducci; Albert W Wu
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 2.  Psychosocial care in cancer.

Authors:  Samantha B Artherholt; Jesse R Fann
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.285

3.  Automated monitoring of symptoms during ambulatory chemotherapy and oncology providers' use of the information: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Kathi H Mooney; Susan L Beck; Robert H Friedman; Ramesh Farzanfar; Bob Wong
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Information Needs of Men with Localized Prostate Cancer During Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Seth E Wolpin; Jason Parks; Mary Galligan; Kenneth J Russell; Donna L Berry
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  What symptoms are important to patients? Developing a symptom burden measure for women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Meagan S Whisenant; Faith A Strunk; Debasish Tripathy; Loretta A Williams
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Risk factors for depression in patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplantation.

Authors:  Samantha B Artherholt; Fangxin Hong; Donna L Berry; Jesse R Fann
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Feasibility of frequent patient-reported outcome surveillance in patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplantation.

Authors:  William A Wood; Allison M Deal; Amy Abernethy; Ethan Basch; Claudio Battaglini; Yoon Hie Kim; Julia Whitley; Charlotte Shatten; Jon Serody; Thomas Shea; Bryce B Reeve
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2012-12-16       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Setting standards for severity of common symptoms in oncology using the PROMIS item banks and expert judgment.

Authors:  David Cella; Seung Choi; Sofia Garcia; Karon F Cook; Sarah Rosenbloom; Jin-Shei Lai; Donna Surges Tatum; Richard Gershon
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 9.  Advancing Oncology Nursing Practice Through the Adoption of Patient Monitoring Digital Tools.

Authors:  Christina M Wilson; Kathi Mooney
Journal:  Semin Oncol Nurs       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 2.315

10.  Using the EORTC-QLQ-C30 in clinical practice for patient management: identifying scores requiring a clinician's attention.

Authors:  Claire F Snyder; Amanda L Blackford; Toru Okuyama; Tatsuo Akechi; Hiroko Yamashita; Tatsuya Toyama; Michael A Carducci; Albert W Wu
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.