| Literature DB >> 21282548 |
Donna L Berry1, Brent A Blumenstein, Barbara Halpenny, Seth Wolpin, Jesse R Fann, Mary Austin-Seymour, Nigel Bush, Bryant T Karras, William B Lober, Ruth McCorkle.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Although patient-reported cancer symptoms and quality-of-life issues (SQLIs) have been promoted as essential to a comprehensive assessment, efficient and efficacious methods have not been widely tested in clinical settings. The purpose of this trial was to determine the effect of the Electronic Self-Report Assessment-Cancer (ESRA-C) on the likelihood of SQLIs discussed between clinicians and patients with cancer in ambulatory clinic visits. Secondary objectives included comparison of visit duration between groups and usefulness of the ESRA-C as reported by clinicians. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This randomized controlled trial was conducted in 660 patients with various cancer diagnoses and stages at two institutions of a comprehensive cancer center. Patient-reported SQLIs were automatically displayed on a graphical summary and provided to the clinical team before an on-treatment visit (n = 327); in the control group, no summary was provided (n = 333). SQLIs were scored for level of severity or distress. One on-treatment clinic visit was audio recorded for each participant and then scored for discussion of each SQLI. We hypothesized that problematic SQLIs would be discussed more often when the intervention was delivered to the clinicians.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21282548 PMCID: PMC3068053 DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2010.30.3909
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Oncol ISSN: 0732-183X Impact factor: 44.544