Literature DB >> 7790650

Relaxation dynamics of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions perturbed by external tones. II. Suppression of interacting emissions.

W J Murphy1, A Tubis, C L Talmadge, G R Long.   

Abstract

The level of a spontaneous otoacoustic emission (SOAE) during recovery from suppression by an external tone sometimes exhibits a prominent overshoot before reaching its normal level. At the onset of suppression, a less prominent undershoot is sometimes observed before the emission level stabilizes. The overshoot and undershoot are described in terms of the variable amount suppression produced by a neighboring higher-frequency SOAE which is responding more slowly to the modulation of the external tone. The variation of the SOAE amplitude during pulsed suppression is modeled by a pair of Van der Pol limit-cycle oscillators with the primary oscillator linearly coupled to the displacement of the secondary high-frequency one. We have found relaxation time constants for the onset of suppression of the order of 4.5 and 7.4 ms for the primary and secondary SOAEs, respectively, and for the recovery from suppression 4.8 and 10.48 ms for the primary and secondary SOAEs, respectively. The same model is also successful in describing the release from suppression of the primary SOAE by the secondary SOAE when the latter is partially suppressed by the external tone. Aspirin administration reduces the magnitude of the overshoot by reducing the level of the higher-frequency SOAE and thereby eliminating the suppression of the lower-frequency one.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7790650     DOI: 10.1121/1.412388

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  8 in total

1.  Effects of low-frequency biasing on spontaneous otoacoustic emissions: frequency modulation.

Authors:  Lin Bian
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions, threshold microstructure, and psychophysical tuning over a wide frequency range in humans.

Authors:  Rachael R Baiduc; Jungmee Lee; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The effect of static ear canal pressure on human spontaneous otoacoustic emissions: spectral width as a measure of the intra-cochlear oscillation amplitude.

Authors:  Pim van Dijk; Bert Maat; Emile de Kleine
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-02

Review 4.  Whistling While it Works: Spontaneous Otoacoustic Emissions and the Cochlear Amplifier.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-01-03

5.  Interactions between hair cells shape spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in a model of the tokay gecko's cochlea.

Authors:  Michael Gelfand; Oreste Piro; Marcelo O Magnasco; A J Hudspeth
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The effect of contralateral acoustic stimulation on spontaneous otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Wei Zhao; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-10-02

7.  The Medial Olivocochlear Reflex Is Unlikely to Play a Role in Listening Difficulties in Children.

Authors:  Sriram Boothalingam; Chris Allan; Prudence Allen; David W Purcell
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

8.  Otoacoustic emissions from ears with spontaneous activity behave differently to those without: Stronger responses to tone bursts as well as to clicks.

Authors:  W Wiktor Jedrzejczak; Krzysztof Kochanek; Henryk Skarzynski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.