Literature DB >> 19045758

A re-evaluation of the relation between physiological channel interaction and electrode pitch ranking in cochlear implants.

Michelle L Hughes1.   

Abstract

Spatial excitation patterns in cochlear implant users can be measured with the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP). This study examined whether the relative separation of ECAP excitation patterns for two electrodes was correlated with the ability to discriminate those electrodes on the basis of pitch. Significant correlations were found for nine of the ten subjects. Electrodes with significant relative overlap of ECAP spatial excitation patterns were generally more difficult to distinguish on the basis of pitch. Pitch-ranking ability and overlap of ECAP patterns were both affected by the relative separation between electrodes in each pair. With increased separation between electrodes, pitch ranking improved significantly, and ECAP spatial excitation patterns showed significantly less overlap.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19045758      PMCID: PMC2596999          DOI: 10.1121/1.2990710

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  5 in total

1.  Effect of current level on electrode discrimination in electrical stimulation.

Authors:  C M McKay; A O'Brien; C J James
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Spatial spread of neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: comparison of improved ECAP method and psychophysical forward masking.

Authors:  Lawrence T Cohen; Louise M Richardson; Elaine Saunders; Robert S C Cowan
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Channel interaction in cochlear implant users evaluated using the electrically evoked compound action potential.

Authors:  Paul J Abbas; Michelle L Hughes; Carolyn J Brown; Charles A Miller; Heather South
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.854

4.  The relation between electrophysiologic channel interaction and electrode pitch ranking in cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Michelle L Hughes; Paul J Abbas
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Electrode interaction in pediatric cochlear implant subjects.

Authors:  Marc D Eisen; Kevin H Franck
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2005-06-10
  5 in total
  20 in total

1.  Effect of stimulus and recording parameters on spatial spread of excitation and masking patterns obtained with the electrically evoked compound action potential in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Michelle L Hughes; Lisa J Stille
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Excitation Patterns of Standard and Steered Partial Tripolar Stimuli in Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Ching-Chih Wu; Xin Luo
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-12-21

3.  Binaural unmasking with multiple adjacent masking electrodes in bilateral cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Thomas Lu; Ruth Litovsky; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Pitch ranking, electrode discrimination, and physiological spread of excitation using current steering in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Jenny L Goehring; Donna L Neff; Jacquelyn L Baudhuin; Michelle L Hughes
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Low-frequency fine-structure cues allow for the online use of lexical stress during spoken-word recognition in spectrally degraded speech.

Authors:  Ying-Yee Kong; Alexandra Jesse
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The Effect of Stimulus Polarity on the Relation Between Pitch Ranking and ECAP Spread of Excitation in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Emily R Spitzer; Sangsook Choi; Michelle L Hughes
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-01-31

7.  Preliminary results of the relationship between the binaural interaction component of the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response and interaural pitch comparisons in bilateral cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Shuman He; Carolyn J Brown; Paul J Abbas
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  ECAP spread of excitation with virtual channels and physical electrodes.

Authors:  Michelle L Hughes; Lisa J Stille; Jacquelyn L Baudhuin; Jenny L Goehring
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  An attempt to improve bilateral cochlear implants by increasing the distance between electrodes and providing complementary information to the two ears.

Authors:  Richard S Tyler; Shelley A Witt; Camille C Dunn; Ann Perreau; Aaron J Parkinson; Blake S Wilson
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.664

10.  Pitch ranking, electrode discrimination, and physiological spread-of-excitation using Cochlear's dual-electrode mode.

Authors:  Jenny L Goehring; Donna L Neff; Jacquelyn L Baudhuin; Michelle L Hughes
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.