Literature DB >> 19040654

Monitoring change in vertebrate abundance: the living planet index.

Ben Collen1, Jonathan Loh, Sarah Whitmee, Louise McRae, Rajan Amin, Jonathan E M Baillie.   

Abstract

The task of measuring the decline of global biodiversity and instituting changes to halt and reverse this downturn has been taken up in response to the Convention on Biological Diversity's 2010 target. It is an undertaking made more difficult by the complex nature of biodiversity and the consequent difficulty in accurately gauging its depletion. In the Living Planet Index, aggregated population trends among vertebrate species indicate the rate of change in the status of biodiversity, and this index can be used to address the question of whether or not the 2010 target has been achieved. We investigated the use of generalized additive models in aggregating large quantities of population trend data, evaluated potential bias that results from collation of existing trends, and explored the feasibility of disaggregating the data (e.g., geographically, taxonomically, regionally, and by thematic area). Our results show strengths in length and completeness of data, little evidence of bias toward threatened species, and the possibility of disaggregation into meaningful subsets. Limitations of the data set are still apparent, in particular the dominance of bird data and gaps in tropical-species population coverage. Population-trend data complement the longer-term, but more coarse-grained, perspectives gained by evaluating species-level extinction rates. To measure progress toward the 2010 target, indicators must be adapted and strategically supplemented with existing data to generate meaningful indicators in time. Beyond 2010, it is critical a strategy be set out for the future development of indicators that will deal with existing data gaps and that is intricately tied to the goals of future biodiversity targets.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19040654     DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01117.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  48 in total

1.  Phylogenetic diversity does not capture body size variation at risk in the world's mammals.

Authors:  Susanne A Fritz; Andy Purvis
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  The bigger they come, the harder they fall: body size and prey abundance influence predator-prey ratios.

Authors:  Chris Carbone; Nathalie Pettorelli; Philip A Stephens
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Population and geographic range dynamics: implications for conservation planning.

Authors:  Georgina M Mace; Ben Collen; Richard A Fuller; Elizabeth H Boakes
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-11-27       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Use of two population metrics clarifies biodiversity dynamics in large-scale monitoring: the case of trees in Japanese old-growth forests: the need for multiple population metrics in large-scale monitoring.

Authors:  Mifuyu Ogawa; Yuichi Yamaura; Shin Abe; Daisuke Hoshino; Kazuhiko Hoshizaki; Shigeo Iida; Toshio Katsuki; Takashi Masaki; Kaoru Niiyama; Satoshi Saito; Takeshi Sakai; Hisashi Sugita; Hiroyuki Tanouchi; Tatsuya Amano; Hisatomo Taki; Kimiko Okabe
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2010-09-24       Impact factor: 2.513

5.  Ecology: Recovering the potential of coral reefs.

Authors:  Nicholas K Dulvy; Holly K Kindsvater
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Ecology and evolution of mammalian biodiversity.

Authors:  Kate E Jones; Kamran Safi
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-09-12       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity.

Authors:  Tim Newbold; Lawrence N Hudson; Samantha L L Hill; Sara Contu; Igor Lysenko; Rebecca A Senior; Luca Börger; Dominic J Bennett; Argyrios Choimes; Ben Collen; Julie Day; Adriana De Palma; Sandra Díaz; Susy Echeverria-Londoño; Melanie J Edgar; Anat Feldman; Morgan Garon; Michelle L K Harrison; Tamera Alhusseini; Daniel J Ingram; Yuval Itescu; Jens Kattge; Victoria Kemp; Lucinda Kirkpatrick; Michael Kleyer; David Laginha Pinto Correia; Callum D Martin; Shai Meiri; Maria Novosolov; Yuan Pan; Helen R P Phillips; Drew W Purves; Alexandra Robinson; Jake Simpson; Sean L Tuck; Evan Weiher; Hannah J White; Robert M Ewers; Georgina M Mace; Jörn P W Scharlemann; Andy Purvis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Large numbers of vertebrates began rapid population decline in the late 19th century.

Authors:  Haipeng Li; Jinggong Xiang-Yu; Guangyi Dai; Zhili Gu; Chen Ming; Zongfeng Yang; Oliver A Ryder; Wen-Hsiung Li; Yun-Xin Fu; Ya-Ping Zhang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Four barriers to the global understanding of biodiversity conservation: wealth, language, geographical location and security.

Authors:  Tatsuya Amano; William J Sutherland
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Distorted views of biodiversity: spatial and temporal bias in species occurrence data.

Authors:  Elizabeth H Boakes; Philip J K McGowan; Richard A Fuller; Ding Chang-qing; Natalie E Clark; Kim O'Connor; Georgina M Mace
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 8.029

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.