Literature DB >> 27872315

Large numbers of vertebrates began rapid population decline in the late 19th century.

Haipeng Li1,2, Jinggong Xiang-Yu2, Guangyi Dai2, Zhili Gu2, Chen Ming2,3, Zongfeng Yang2,3, Oliver A Ryder4, Wen-Hsiung Li5,6, Yun-Xin Fu7,8, Ya-Ping Zhang9,3,10.   

Abstract

Accelerated losses of biodiversity are a hallmark of the current era. Large declines of population size have been widely observed and currently 22,176 species are threatened by extinction. The time at which a threatened species began rapid population decline (RPD) and the rate of RPD provide important clues about the driving forces of population decline and anticipated extinction time. However, these parameters remain unknown for the vast majority of threatened species. Here we analyzed the genetic diversity data of nuclear and mitochondrial loci of 2,764 vertebrate species and found that the mean genetic diversity is lower in threatened species than in related nonthreatened species. Our coalescence-based modeling suggests that in many threatened species the RPD began ∼123 y ago (a 95% confidence interval of 20-260 y). This estimated date coincides with widespread industrialization and a profound change in global living ecosystems over the past two centuries. On average the population size declined by ∼25% every 10 y in a threatened species, and the population size was reduced to ∼5% of its ancestral size. Moreover, the ancestral size of threatened species was, on average, ∼22% smaller than that of nonthreatened species. Because the time period of RPD is short, the cumulative effect of RPD on genetic diversity is still not strong, so that the smaller ancestral size of threatened species may be the major cause of their reduced genetic diversity; RPD explains 24.1-37.5% of the difference in genetic diversity between threatened and nonthreatened species.

Keywords:  coalescent; conservation; rapid population decline; threatened species; vertebrate

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27872315      PMCID: PMC5150392          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1616804113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  24 in total

1.  On the number of segregating sites in genetical models without recombination.

Authors:  G A Watterson
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 1.570

2.  Most species are not driven to extinction before genetic factors impact them.

Authors:  Derek Spielman; Barry W Brook; Richard Frankham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-10-11       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Population size does not influence mitochondrial genetic diversity in animals.

Authors:  Eric Bazin; Sylvain Glémin; Nicolas Galtier
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-04-28       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  New statistical tests of neutrality for DNA samples from a population.

Authors:  Y X Fu
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations against population growth, hitchhiking and background selection.

Authors:  Y X Fu
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity.

Authors:  Tim Newbold; Lawrence N Hudson; Samantha L L Hill; Sara Contu; Igor Lysenko; Rebecca A Senior; Luca Börger; Dominic J Bennett; Argyrios Choimes; Ben Collen; Julie Day; Adriana De Palma; Sandra Díaz; Susy Echeverria-Londoño; Melanie J Edgar; Anat Feldman; Morgan Garon; Michelle L K Harrison; Tamera Alhusseini; Daniel J Ingram; Yuval Itescu; Jens Kattge; Victoria Kemp; Lucinda Kirkpatrick; Michael Kleyer; David Laginha Pinto Correia; Callum D Martin; Shai Meiri; Maria Novosolov; Yuan Pan; Helen R P Phillips; Drew W Purves; Alexandra Robinson; Jake Simpson; Sean L Tuck; Evan Weiher; Hannah J White; Robert M Ewers; Georgina M Mace; Jörn P W Scharlemann; Andy Purvis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism.

Authors:  F Tajima
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Sampling theory for neutral alleles in a varying environment.

Authors:  R C Griffiths; S Tavaré
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1994-06-29       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Inference of human population history from individual whole-genome sequences.

Authors:  Heng Li; Richard Durbin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Exploring population size changes using SNP frequency spectra.

Authors:  Xiaoming Liu; Yun-Xin Fu
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 38.330

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Genetic load: genomic estimates and applications in non-model animals.

Authors:  Giorgio Bertorelle; Francesca Raffini; Hernán E Morales; Cock van Oosterhout; Mirte Bosse; Chiara Bortoluzzi; Alessio Iannucci; Emiliano Trucchi
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 59.581

2.  Variances and covariances of linear summary statistics of segregating sites.

Authors:  Yun-Xin Fu
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 1.514

3.  Unshifting the baseline: a framework for documenting historical population changes and assessing long-term anthropogenic impacts.

Authors:  Ana S L Rodrigues; Sophie Monsarrat; Anne Charpentier; Thomas M Brooks; Michael Hoffmann; Randall Reeves; Maria L D Palomares; Samuel T Turvey
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Population genomic, climatic and anthropogenic evidence suggest the role of human forces in endangerment of green peafowl (Pavo muticus).

Authors:  Feng Dong; Hao-Chih Kuo; Guo-Ling Chen; Fei Wu; Peng-Fei Shan; Jie Wang; Fu-Min Lei; Chih-Ming Hung; Yang Liu; Xiao-Jun Yang
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 5.  Next-generation metrics for monitoring genetic erosion within populations of conservation concern.

Authors:  Gregoire Leroy; Emma L Carroll; Mike W Bruford; J Andrew DeWoody; Allan Strand; Lisette Waits; Jinliang Wang
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 5.183

6.  Evolutionary history and past climate change shape the distribution of genetic diversity in terrestrial mammals.

Authors:  Spyros Theodoridis; Damien A Fordham; Stuart C Brown; Sen Li; Carsten Rahbek; David Nogues-Bravo
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Demographic histories and genetic diversity across pinnipeds are shaped by human exploitation, ecology and life-history.

Authors:  M A Stoffel; E Humble; A J Paijmans; K Acevedo-Whitehouse; B L Chilvers; B Dickerson; F Galimberti; N J Gemmell; S D Goldsworthy; H J Nichols; O Krüger; S Negro; A Osborne; T Pastor; B C Robertson; S Sanvito; J K Schultz; A B A Shafer; J B W Wolf; J I Hoffman
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Genetic and genomic monitoring with minimally invasive sampling methods.

Authors:  Emma L Carroll; Mike W Bruford; J Andrew DeWoody; Gregoire Leroy; Alan Strand; Lisette Waits; Jinliang Wang
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2018-03-24       Impact factor: 5.183

9.  War-induced collapse and asymmetric recovery of large-mammal populations in Gorongosa National Park, Mozambique.

Authors:  Marc E Stalmans; Tara J Massad; Mike J S Peel; Corina E Tarnita; Robert M Pringle
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  New altitudinal record for white-lipped peccary Tayassu pecari (Link, 1795) in Ecuador, with notes about activity patterns and herd size.

Authors:  Javier Torres; María Mercedes Gavilánez
Journal:  Biodivers Data J       Date:  2019-04-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.