Literature DB >> 23390102

Four barriers to the global understanding of biodiversity conservation: wealth, language, geographical location and security.

Tatsuya Amano1, William J Sutherland.   

Abstract

Global biodiversity conservation is seriously challenged by gaps and heterogeneity in the geographical coverage of existing information. Nevertheless, the key barriers to the collection and compilation of biodiversity information at a global scale have yet to be identified. We show that wealth, language, geographical location and security each play an important role in explaining spatial variations in data availability in four different types of biodiversity databases. The number of records per square kilometre is high in countries with high per capita gross domestic product (GDP), high proportion of English speakers and high security levels, and those located close to the country hosting the database; but these are not necessarily countries with high biodiversity. These factors are considered to affect data availability by impeding either the activities of scientific research or active international communications. Our results demonstrate that efforts to solve environmental problems at a global scale will gain significantly by focusing scientific education, communication, research and collaboration in low-GDP countries with fewer English speakers and located far from Western countries that host the global databases; countries that have experienced conflict may also benefit. Findings of this study may be broadly applicable to other fields that require the compilation of scientific knowledge at a global level.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23390102      PMCID: PMC3574366          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2012.2649

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  17 in total

1.  The scientific impact of nations.

Authors:  David A King
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Of towers, walls, and fields: perspectives on language in science.

Authors:  Scott Montgomery
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-02-27       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Biases in comparative analyses of extinction risk: mind the gap.

Authors:  Manuela González-Suárez; Pablo M Lucas; Eloy Revilla
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2012-05-28       Impact factor: 5.091

4.  Global patterns and predictors of marine biodiversity across taxa.

Authors:  Derek P Tittensor; Camilo Mora; Walter Jetz; Heike K Lotze; Daniel Ricard; Edward Vanden Berghe; Boris Worm
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Global biodiversity: indicators of recent declines.

Authors:  Stuart H M Butchart; Matt Walpole; Ben Collen; Arco van Strien; Jörn P W Scharlemann; Rosamunde E A Almond; Jonathan E M Baillie; Bastian Bomhard; Claire Brown; John Bruno; Kent E Carpenter; Geneviève M Carr; Janice Chanson; Anna M Chenery; Jorge Csirke; Nick C Davidson; Frank Dentener; Matt Foster; Alessandro Galli; James N Galloway; Piero Genovesi; Richard D Gregory; Marc Hockings; Valerie Kapos; Jean-Francois Lamarque; Fiona Leverington; Jonathan Loh; Melodie A McGeoch; Louise McRae; Anahit Minasyan; Monica Hernández Morcillo; Thomasina E E Oldfield; Daniel Pauly; Suhel Quader; Carmen Revenga; John R Sauer; Benjamin Skolnik; Dian Spear; Damon Stanwell-Smith; Simon N Stuart; Andy Symes; Megan Tierney; Tristan D Tyrrell; Jean-Christophe Vié; Reg Watson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Conservation. Filling gaps in global biodiversity estimates.

Authors:  Elizabeth Pennisi
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Global distribution and conservation of rare and threatened vertebrates.

Authors:  Richard Grenyer; C David L Orme; Sarah F Jackson; Gavin H Thomas; Richard G Davies; T Jonathan Davies; Kate E Jones; Valerie A Olson; Robert S Ridgely; Pamela C Rasmussen; Tzung-Su Ding; Peter M Bennett; Tim M Blackburn; Kevin J Gaston; John L Gittleman; Ian P F Owens
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-11-02       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  The importance of behavioural studies in conservation biology.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 2.844

9.  Distorted views of biodiversity: spatial and temporal bias in species occurrence data.

Authors:  Elizabeth H Boakes; Philip J K McGowan; Richard A Fuller; Ding Chang-qing; Natalie E Clark; Kim O'Connor; Georgina M Mace
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  How global is the global biodiversity information facility?

Authors:  Chris Yesson; Peter W Brewer; Tim Sutton; Neil Caithness; Jaspreet S Pahwa; Mikhaila Burgess; W Alec Gray; Richard J White; Andrew C Jones; Frank A Bisby; Alastair Culham
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  28 in total

1.  Geographical variation in species' population responses to changes in temperature and precipitation.

Authors:  James W Pearce-Higgins; Nancy Ockendon; David J Baker; Jamie Carr; Elizabeth C White; Rosamunde E A Almond; Tatsuya Amano; Esther Bertram; Richard B Bradbury; Cassie Bradley; Stuart H M Butchart; Nathalie Doswald; Wendy Foden; David J C Gill; Rhys E Green; William J Sutherland; Edmund V J Tanner
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  The last decade in ecological climate change impact research: where are we now?

Authors:  Anja Jaeschke; Torsten Bittner; Anke Jentsch; Carl Beierkuhnlein
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2014-01-04

3.  The role of published information in reviewing conservation objectives for Natura 2000 protected areas in the European Union.

Authors:  Otars Opermanis; Brian MacSharry; Jerome Bailly-Maitre; Douglas Evans; Zelmira Sipkova
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2013-12-07       Impact factor: 3.266

4.  The relationship among biodiversity, governance, wealth, and scientific capacity at a country level: Disaggregation and prioritization.

Authors:  Andrés Lira-Noriega; Jorge Soberón
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 5.129

5.  Poor geographical match between the distributions of host diversity and parasite discovery effort.

Authors:  Fátima Jorge; Robert Poulin
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Colonial history and global economics distort our understanding of deep-time biodiversity.

Authors:  Nussaïbah B Raja; Emma M Dunne; Aviwe Matiwane; Tasnuva Ming Khan; Paulina S Nätscher; Aline M Ghilardi; Devapriya Chattopadhyay
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-12-30       Impact factor: 19.100

Review 7.  Biological invasions, climate change and genomics.

Authors:  Steven L Chown; Kathryn A Hodgins; Philippa C Griffin; John G Oakeshott; Margaret Byrne; Ary A Hoffmann
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 5.183

8.  Global priorities for an effective information basis of biodiversity distributions.

Authors:  Carsten Meyer; Holger Kreft; Robert Guralnick; Walter Jetz
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  The effect of scientific evidence on conservation practitioners' management decisions.

Authors:  Jessica C Walsh; Lynn V Dicks; William J Sutherland
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 6.560

10.  Influence of artifact removal on rare species recovery in natural complex communities using high-throughput sequencing.

Authors:  Aibin Zhan; Wei Xiong; Song He; Hugh J Macisaac
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.