| Literature DB >> 25832402 |
Tim Newbold1, Lawrence N Hudson2, Samantha L L Hill3, Sara Contu2, Igor Lysenko4, Rebecca A Senior5, Luca Börger6, Dominic J Bennett4, Argyrios Choimes7, Ben Collen8, Julie Day4, Adriana De Palma7, Sandra Díaz9, Susy Echeverria-Londoño2, Melanie J Edgar2, Anat Feldman10, Morgan Garon4, Michelle L K Harrison4, Tamera Alhusseini4, Daniel J Ingram4, Yuval Itescu10, Jens Kattge11, Victoria Kemp4, Lucinda Kirkpatrick4, Michael Kleyer12, David Laginha Pinto Correia2, Callum D Martin4, Shai Meiri10, Maria Novosolov10, Yuan Pan4, Helen R P Phillips7, Drew W Purves13, Alexandra Robinson4, Jake Simpson4, Sean L Tuck14, Evan Weiher15, Hannah J White4, Robert M Ewers4, Georgina M Mace8, Jörn P W Scharlemann16, Andy Purvis7.
Abstract
Human activities, especially conversion and degradation of habitats, are causing global biodiversity declines. How local ecological assemblages are responding is less clear--a concern given their importance for many ecosystem functions and services. We analysed a terrestrial assemblage database of unprecedented geographic and taxonomic coverage to quantify local biodiversity responses to land use and related changes. Here we show that in the worst-affected habitats, these pressures reduce within-sample species richness by an average of 76.5%, total abundance by 39.5% and rarefaction-based richness by 40.3%. We estimate that, globally, these pressures have already slightly reduced average within-sample richness (by 13.6%), total abundance (10.7%) and rarefaction-based richness (8.1%), with changes showing marked spatial variation. Rapid further losses are predicted under a business-as-usual land-use scenario; within-sample richness is projected to fall by a further 3.4% globally by 2100, with losses concentrated in biodiverse but economically poor countries. Strong mitigation can deliver much more positive biodiversity changes (up to a 1.9% average increase) that are less strongly related to countries' socioeconomic status.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25832402 DOI: 10.1038/nature14324
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nature ISSN: 0028-0836 Impact factor: 49.962