BACKGROUND: Life-space, a measure of movement through one's environment, may be viewed as one aspect of environmental complexity for older adults. We examined the relationship between life-space and subsequent change in cognitive function. METHODS: Participants were 624 community-dwelling Medicare beneficiaries (49% African American) who completed in-home assessments at baseline and follow-up 4 years later. The Life-Space Assessment was used at baseline to measure extent, frequency, and independence of participants' movement within and outside the home. Cognitive decline was measured with the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). RESULTS: In a regression model adjusted for baseline MMSE, age, gender, race, residence (rural/urban), and education, greater life-space at baseline predicted reduced cognitive decline (beta = -.177, p <.001). This association remained statistically significant in subsequent models that examined what proportion of the observed association was explained by baseline physical activity, physical function, vascular risk factors, comorbidity, and psychosocial factors. Physical function accounted for the largest proportion (37.3%) of the association between life-space and cognitive decline. There was no significant interaction between life-space and race, gender, or age in predicting cognitive decline. In a logistic regression analysis, participants in the highest quartile of life-space had 53% reduced odds of substantial cognitive decline (> or =4 points on MMSE) compared to those in the lowest quartile. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary findings suggest that life-space may be a useful identifier of older adults at risk for cognitive decline. Future research should investigate the potential reciprocal relationship between life-space and cognitive function as well as the interrelationship between these factors and physical function.
BACKGROUND: Life-space, a measure of movement through one's environment, may be viewed as one aspect of environmental complexity for older adults. We examined the relationship between life-space and subsequent change in cognitive function. METHODS:Participants were 624 community-dwelling Medicare beneficiaries (49% African American) who completed in-home assessments at baseline and follow-up 4 years later. The Life-Space Assessment was used at baseline to measure extent, frequency, and independence of participants' movement within and outside the home. Cognitive decline was measured with the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). RESULTS: In a regression model adjusted for baseline MMSE, age, gender, race, residence (rural/urban), and education, greater life-space at baseline predicted reduced cognitive decline (beta = -.177, p <.001). This association remained statistically significant in subsequent models that examined what proportion of the observed association was explained by baseline physical activity, physical function, vascular risk factors, comorbidity, and psychosocial factors. Physical function accounted for the largest proportion (37.3%) of the association between life-space and cognitive decline. There was no significant interaction between life-space and race, gender, or age in predicting cognitive decline. In a logistic regression analysis, participants in the highest quartile of life-space had 53% reduced odds of substantial cognitive decline (> or =4 points on MMSE) compared to those in the lowest quartile. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary findings suggest that life-space may be a useful identifier of older adults at risk for cognitive decline. Future research should investigate the potential reciprocal relationship between life-space and cognitive function as well as the interrelationship between these factors and physical function.
Authors: Richard M Allman; Patricia Sawyer Baker; Richard M Maisiak; Richard V Sims; Jeffrey M Roseman Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Jane S Saczynski; Lisa A Pfeifer; Kamal Masaki; Esther S C Korf; Danielle Laurin; Lon White; Lenore J Launer Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2006-01-12 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Laura Jean Podewils; Eliseo Guallar; Lewis H Kuller; Linda P Fried; Oscar L Lopez; Michelle Carlson; Constantine G Lyketsos Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2005-04-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Gina M McCaskill; Patricia Sawyer; Kathryn L Burgio; Richard Kennedy; Courtney P Williams; Olivio J Clay; Cynthia J Brown; Richard M Allman Journal: Ethn Dis Date: 2015-08-07 Impact factor: 1.847
Authors: Ana Katrin Schenk; Bradley C Witbrodt; Carrie A Hoarty; Richard H Carlson; Evan H Goulding; Jane F Potter; Stephen J Bonasera Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2011-02-02 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Kumar B Rajan; Liesi E Hebert; Paul A Scherr; Carlos F Mendes de Leon; Denis A Evans Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2015-05-02 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Chao-Yi Wu; Juleen Rodakowski; Lauren Terhorst; Mary Amanda Dew; Meryl Butters; Jordan F Karp; Steven M Albert; Ariel G Gildengers; Charles F Reynolds; Elizabeth R Skidmore Journal: J Appl Gerontol Date: 2021-01-06
Authors: Dawn C Mackey; Li-Yung Lui; Peggy M Cawthon; Kristine Ensrud; Kristine Yaffe; Steven R Cummings Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2016-10-03 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Dawn C Mackey; Jane A Cauley; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; John T Schousboe; Peggy M Cawthon; Steven R Cummings Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2014-06-16 Impact factor: 5.562