OBJECTIVES: To describe a system that uses off-the-shelf sensor and telecommunication technologies to continuously measure individual lifespace and activity levels in a novel way. DESIGN: Proof of concept involving three field trials of 30, 30, and 21 days. SETTING: Omaha, Nebraska, metropolitan and surrounding rural region. PARTICIPANTS: Three participants (48-year-old man, 33-year-old woman, and 27-year-old male), none with any functional limitations. MEASUREMENTS: Cellular telephones were used to detect in-home position and in-community location and to measure physical activity. Within the home, cellular telephones and Bluetooth transmitters (beacons) were used to locate participants at room-level resolution. Outside the home, the same cellular telephones and global positioning system (GPS) technology were used to locate participants at a community-level resolution. Physical activity was simultaneously measured using the cellular telephone accelerometer. RESULTS: This approach had face validity to measure activity and lifespace. More importantly, this system could measure the spatial and temporal organization of these metrics. For example, an individual's lifespace was automatically calculated across multiple time intervals. Behavioral time budgets showing how people allocate time to specific regions within the home were also automatically generated. CONCLUSION: Mobile monitoring shows much promise as an easily deployed system to quantify activity and lifespace, important indicators of function, in community-dwelling adults.
OBJECTIVES: To describe a system that uses off-the-shelf sensor and telecommunication technologies to continuously measure individual lifespace and activity levels in a novel way. DESIGN: Proof of concept involving three field trials of 30, 30, and 21 days. SETTING: Omaha, Nebraska, metropolitan and surrounding rural region. PARTICIPANTS: Three participants (48-year-old man, 33-year-old woman, and 27-year-old male), none with any functional limitations. MEASUREMENTS: Cellular telephones were used to detect in-home position and in-community location and to measure physical activity. Within the home, cellular telephones and Bluetooth transmitters (beacons) were used to locate participants at room-level resolution. Outside the home, the same cellular telephones and global positioning system (GPS) technology were used to locate participants at a community-level resolution. Physical activity was simultaneously measured using the cellular telephone accelerometer. RESULTS: This approach had face validity to measure activity and lifespace. More importantly, this system could measure the spatial and temporal organization of these metrics. For example, an individual's lifespace was automatically calculated across multiple time intervals. Behavioral time budgets showing how people allocate time to specific regions within the home were also automatically generated. CONCLUSION: Mobile monitoring shows much promise as an easily deployed system to quantify activity and lifespace, important indicators of function, in community-dwelling adults.
Authors: J N Crawley; J K Belknap; A Collins; J C Crabbe; W Frankel; N Henderson; R J Hitzemann; S C Maxson; L L Miner; A J Silva; J M Wehner; A Wynshaw-Boris; R Paylor Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 1997-07 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Luigi Ferrucci; Jack M Guralnik; Stephanie Studenski; Linda P Fried; Gordon B Cutler; Jeremy D Walston Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Richard H Carlson; Derek R Huebner; Carrie A Hoarty; Jackie Whittington; Gleb Haynatzki; Michele C Balas; Ana Katrin Schenk; Evan H Goulding; Jane F Potter; Stephen J Bonasera Journal: Gait Posture Date: 2012-04-02 Impact factor: 2.840
Authors: Neng Wan; Wenyu Qu; Jackie Whittington; Bradley C Witbrodt; Mary Pearl Henderson; Evan H Goulding; A Katrin Schenk; Stephen J Bonasera; Ge Lin Journal: Environ Plann B Plann Des Date: 2013-04-01
Authors: Hans Van Remoortel; Santiago Giavedoni; Yogini Raste; Chris Burtin; Zafeiris Louvaris; Elena Gimeno-Santos; Daniel Langer; Alastair Glendenning; Nicholas S Hopkinson; Ioannis Vogiatzis; Barry T Peterson; Frederick Wilson; Bridget Mann; Roberto Rabinovich; Milo A Puhan; Thierry Troosters Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2012-07-09 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Lily Kamalyan; Jiue-An Yang; Caitlin N Pope; Emily W Paolillo; Laura M Campbell; Bin Tang; María J Marquine; Colin A Depp; Raeanne C Moore Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2020-11-20 Impact factor: 7.996
Authors: Jacki Liddle; David Ireland; Simon J McBride; Sandra G Brauer; Leanne M Hall; Hang Ding; Mohan Karunanithi; Paul W Hodges; Deborah Theodoros; Peter A Silburn; Helen J Chenery Journal: JMIR Mhealth Uhealth Date: 2014-03-12 Impact factor: 4.773