Patricia S Baker1, Eric V Bodner, Richard M Allman. 1. Department of Sociology Center for Aging, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35294, USA. pbaker@uab.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the validity and reliability of a standardized approach for assessing life-space mobility (the University of Alabama at Birmingham Study of Aging Life-Space Assessment (LSA)) and its ability to detect changes in life-space over time in community-dwelling older adults. DESIGN: Prospective, observational cohort study. SETTING: Five counties (three rural and two urban) in central Alabama. PARTICIPANTS: Community-dwelling Medicare beneficiaries (N=306; 46% male, 43% African American) who completed in-home baseline interviews and 2-week and 6-month telephone follow-up interviews. MEASUREMENTS: The LSA assessed the range, independence, and frequency of movement over the 4 weeks preceding assessments. Correlations between the baseline LSA and measures of physical and mental health (physical performance, activities of daily living, instrumental activities of daily living, a global measure of health (the short form-12 question survey), the Geriatric Depression Scale, and comorbidities) established validity. Follow-up LSA scores established short-term test-retest reliability and the ability of the LSA to detect change. RESULTS: For all LSA scoring methods, baseline and 2-week follow-up LSA correlations were greater than 0.86 (95% confidence interval=0.82-0.97). Highest correlations with measures of physical performance and function were noted for the LSA scoring method considering all attributes of mobility. The LSA showed both increases and decreases at 6 months. DISCUSSION: Life-space correlated with observed physical performance and self-reported function. It was stable over a 2-week period yet showed changes at 6 months.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the validity and reliability of a standardized approach for assessing life-space mobility (the University of Alabama at Birmingham Study of Aging Life-Space Assessment (LSA)) and its ability to detect changes in life-space over time in community-dwelling older adults. DESIGN: Prospective, observational cohort study. SETTING: Five counties (three rural and two urban) in central Alabama. PARTICIPANTS: Community-dwelling Medicare beneficiaries (N=306; 46% male, 43% African American) who completed in-home baseline interviews and 2-week and 6-month telephone follow-up interviews. MEASUREMENTS: The LSA assessed the range, independence, and frequency of movement over the 4 weeks preceding assessments. Correlations between the baseline LSA and measures of physical and mental health (physical performance, activities of daily living, instrumental activities of daily living, a global measure of health (the short form-12 question survey), the Geriatric Depression Scale, and comorbidities) established validity. Follow-up LSA scores established short-term test-retest reliability and the ability of the LSA to detect change. RESULTS: For all LSA scoring methods, baseline and 2-week follow-up LSA correlations were greater than 0.86 (95% confidence interval=0.82-0.97). Highest correlations with measures of physical performance and function were noted for the LSA scoring method considering all attributes of mobility. The LSA showed both increases and decreases at 6 months. DISCUSSION: Life-space correlated with observed physical performance and self-reported function. It was stable over a 2-week period yet showed changes at 6 months.
Authors: Alayne D Markland; Patricia S Goode; Kathryn L Burgio; David T Redden; Holly E Richter; Patricia Sawyer; Richard M Allman Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2010-06-01 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: R Lee Kirby; William C Miller; Francois Routhier; Louise Demers; Alex Mihailidis; Jan Miller Polgar; Paula W Rushton; Laura Titus; Cher Smith; Mike McAllister; Chris Theriault; Kara Thompson; Bonita Sawatzky Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2015-07-30 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Gina M McCaskill; Patricia Sawyer; Kathryn L Burgio; Richard Kennedy; Courtney P Williams; Olivio J Clay; Cynthia J Brown; Richard M Allman Journal: Ethn Dis Date: 2015-08-07 Impact factor: 1.847
Authors: Sarah L Szanton; J W Wolff; B Leff; R J Thorpe; E K Tanner; C Boyd; Q Xue; J Guralnik; D Bishai; L N Gitlin Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2014-03-28 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: David R Buys; David L Roth; Christine S Ritchie; Patricia Sawyer; Richard M Allman; Ellen M Funkhouser; Martha Hovater; Julie L Locher Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2014-03-03 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Julie L Locher; Christine S Ritchie; David L Roth; Patricia Sawyer Baker; Eric V Bodner; Richard M Allman Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Dawn C Mackey; Li-Yung Lui; Peggy M Cawthon; Kristine Ensrud; Kristine Yaffe; Steven R Cummings Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2016-10-03 Impact factor: 5.562