Literature DB >> 19035741

Circumferential fusion for cervical kyphotic deformity.

Praveen V Mummaneni1, Sanjay S Dhall, Gerald E Rodts, Regis W Haid.   

Abstract

OBJECT: The treatment of cervical kyphotic deformity is challenging. Few prior reports have examined combined anterior/posterior correction methods, and fusion rates and standardized outcomes are rarely cited in literature examining these techniques. The authors present their midterm results with cervical kyphosis correction.
METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed the charts of 30 patients with cervical kyphotic deformity who underwent circumferential spine surgery between 2001 and 2007. The causes of the deformity included chronic fracture in 17 patients, degenerative disease in 10, and tumor in 3. Anterior procedures included discectomies and corpectomies/osteotomies at 1 or more levels with fusion. Posterior operations included decompression and/or osteotomies with lateral mass or pedicle fixation. Preoperative and postoperative Ishihara kyphosis indices, modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) scores, and Nurick grades were analyzed. Arthrodesis was assessed via dynamic radiographs, and CT scans were used to assess fusion in questionable cases.
RESULTS: One patient was lost to follow-up. Two patients died within 1 month of surgery. The follow-up period in the remaining 27 patients ranged from 1 to 6.4 years (mean 2.6 years). Ishihara indices improved from a preoperative mean of -17.7 to a postoperative mean of +11.4. The mean Nurick grades improved from 3.2 preoperatively to 1.3 postoperatively. The mJOA scores improved from a preoperative mean of 10 to 15 postoperatively. All surviving patients who underwent follow-up showed postoperative fusion except 1 patient with renal failure and osteoporosis (95% fusion rate). The overall rate of complications (major and minor) was 33.3%.
CONCLUSIONS: In cases of cervical kyphosis, management with decompression, osteotomy, and stabilization from both anterior and posterior approaches can restore cervical lordosis. Furthermore, such surgical techniques can produce measurable improvements in neurological function (as measured with Nurick grades and mJOA scores) and achieve high fusion rates. However, there is a significant rate of complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19035741     DOI: 10.3171/SPI.2008.10.08226

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  28 in total

1.  Three-column osteotomies of the lower cervical and upper thoracic spine: comparison of early outcomes, radiographic parameters, and peri-operative complications in 48 patients.

Authors:  Alexander A Theologis; Ehsan Tabaraee; Haruki Funao; Justin S Smith; Shane Burch; Bobby Tay; Khaled Kebaish; Vedat Deviren; Christopher Ames
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  The stabilizing potential of anterior, posterior and combined techniques for the reconstruction of a 2-level cervical corpectomy model: biomechanical study and first results of ATPS prototyping.

Authors:  Heiko Koller; Rene Schmidt; Michael Mayer; Wolfgang Hitzl; Juliane Zenner; Stefan Midderhoff; Stefan Middendorf; Nicolaus Graf; Nicolaus Gräf; H Resch; Hans-Joachim Wilke; Hans-Joachim Willke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Accuracy of 3D fluoroscopy-navigated anterior transpedicular screw insertion in the cervical spine: an experimental study.

Authors:  Jan Bredow; Carolin Meyer; Max Joseph Scheyerer; Florian Siedek; Lars Peter Müller; Peer Eysel; Gregor Stein
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Construct stability of an instrumented 2-level cervical corpectomy model following fatigue testing: biomechanical comparison of circumferential antero-posterior instrumentation versus a novel anterior-only transpedicular screw-plate fixation technique.

Authors:  Heiko Koller; Werner Schmoelz; Juliane Zenner; Alexander Auffarth; Herbert Resch; Wolfgang Hitzl; Davud Malekzadeh; Lukas Ernstbrunner; Martina Blocher; Michael Mayer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Adult cervical deformity: radiographic and osteotomy classifications.

Authors:  Bassel G Diebo; Neil V Shah; Maximillian Solow; Vincent Challier; Carl B Paulino; Peter G Passias; Renaud Lafage; Frank J Schwab; Han Jo Kim; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 6.  [Normal sagittal profile of the cervical spine - must the cervical spine always be lordotic?]

Authors:  M Akbar; H Almansour; B Diebo; D Adler; W Pepke; M Richter
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  An in vitro evaluation of sagittal alignment in the cervical spine after insertion of supraphysiologic lordotic implants.

Authors:  Donald J Blaskiewicz; Jeffrey E Harris; Patrick P Han; Alexander W Turner; Gregory M Mundis
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-05-13       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 8.  [Intraoperative neuromonitoring in cervical deformity surgery].

Authors:  E Shiban; B Meyer
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.087

9.  Characteristics of deformity surgery in patients with severe and rigid cervical kyphosis (CK): results of the CSRS-Europe multi-centre study project.

Authors:  H Koller; C Ames; H Mehdian; R Bartels; R Ferch; V Deriven; H Toyone; C Shaffrey; J Smith; W Hitzl; J Schröder; Yohan Robinson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  In vitro study of accuracy of cervical pedicle screw insertion using an electronic conductivity device (ATPS part III).

Authors:  Heiko Koller; Wolfgang Hitzl; Frank Acosta; Mark Tauber; Juliane Zenner; Herbert Resch; Yasutsugu Yukawa; Oliver Meier; Rene Schmidt; Michael Mayer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-07-03       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.