Literature DB >> 19034793

Airborne monitoring to distinguish engineered nanomaterials from incidental particles for environmental health and safety.

Thomas M Peters1, Sherrie Elzey, Ronald Johnson, Heaweon Park, Vicki H Grassian, Tabitha Maher, Patrick O'Shaughnessy.   

Abstract

Two methods were used to distinguish airborne engineered nanomaterials from other airborne particles in a facility that produces nano-structured lithium titanate metal oxide powder. The first method involved off-line analysis of filter samples collected with conventional respirable samplers at each of seven locations (six near production processes and one outdoors). Throughout most of the facility and outdoors, respirable mass concentrations were low (<0.050 mg/m(3)) and were attributed to particles other than the nanomaterial (<10% by mass titanium determined with inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry). In contrast, in a single area with extensive material handling, mass concentrations were greatest (0.118 mg m(-3)) and contained up to 39% +/- 11% lithium titanium, indicating the presence of airborne nanomaterial. Analysis of the filter samples collected in this area by transmission electron microscope and scanning electron microscope revealed that the airborne nanomaterial was associated only with spherical aggregates (clusters of fused 10-80 nm nanoparticles) that were larger than 200 nm. This analysis also showed that nanoparticles in this area were the smallest particles of a larger distribution of submicrometer chain agglomerates likely from welding in an adjacent area of the facility. The second method used two, hand-held, direct-reading, battery-operated instruments to obtain a time series of very fine particle number (<300 nm), respirable mass, and total mass concentration, which were then related to activities within the area of extensive material handling. This activity-based monitoring showed that very fine particle number concentrations (<300 nm) had no apparent correlation to worker activities, but that sharp peaks in the respirable and total mass concentration coincided with loading a hopper and replacing nanomaterial collection bags. These findings were consistent with those from the filter-based method in that they demonstrate that airborne nanoparticles in this facility are dominated by "incidental" sources (e.g., welding or grinding), and that the airborne "engineered" product is predominately composed of particles larger than several hundred nanometers. The methods presented here are applicable to any occupational or environmental setting in which one needs to distinguish incidental sources from engineered product.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19034793      PMCID: PMC4789272          DOI: 10.1080/15459620802590058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg        ISSN: 1545-9624            Impact factor:   2.155


  17 in total

1.  Determinants of exposure to metalworking fluid aerosol in small machine shops.

Authors:  Andrew S Ross; Kay Teschke; Michael Brauer; Susan M Kennedy
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2004-07-07

2.  Membrane-filter, direct-transfer technique for the analysis of asbestos fibers or other inorganic particles by transmission electron microscopy.

Authors:  G J Burdett; A P Rood
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  1983-11-01       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  The mapping of fine and ultrafine particle concentrations in an engine machining and assembly facility.

Authors:  Thomas M Peters; William A Heitbrink; Douglas E Evans; Thomas J Slavin; Andrew D Maynard
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2005-12-16

4.  The perils of pre-emptive regulation.

Authors:  John C Monica; Michael E Heintz; Patrick T Lewis
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 39.213

Review 5.  A review of carbon nanotube toxicity and assessment of potential occupational and environmental health risks.

Authors:  Chiu-Wing Lam; John T James; Richard McCluskey; Sivaram Arepalli; Robert L Hunter
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.635

6.  Unusual inflammatory and fibrogenic pulmonary responses to single-walled carbon nanotubes in mice.

Authors:  Anna A Shvedova; Elena R Kisin; Robert Mercer; Ashley R Murray; Victor J Johnson; Alla I Potapovich; Yulia Y Tyurina; Olga Gorelik; Sevaram Arepalli; Diane Schwegler-Berry; Ann F Hubbs; James Antonini; Douglas E Evans; Bon-Ki Ku; Dawn Ramsey; Andrew Maynard; Valerian E Kagan; Vincent Castranova; Paul Baron
Journal:  Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol       Date:  2005-06-10       Impact factor: 5.464

7.  Carbon nanotubes introduced into the abdominal cavity of mice show asbestos-like pathogenicity in a pilot study.

Authors:  Craig A Poland; Rodger Duffin; Ian Kinloch; Andrew Maynard; William A H Wallace; Anthony Seaton; Vicki Stone; Simon Brown; William Macnee; Ken Donaldson
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 39.213

8.  Single-walled carbon nanotubes: geno- and cytotoxic effects in lung fibroblast V79 cells.

Authors:  Elena R Kisin; Ashley R Murray; Michael J Keane; Xiao-Chun Shi; Diane Schwegler-Berry; Olga Gorelik; Sivaram Arepalli; Vincent Castranova; William E Wallace; Valerian E Kagan; Anna A Shvedova
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A       Date:  2007-12

Review 9.  Nanotoxicology: an emerging discipline evolving from studies of ultrafine particles.

Authors:  Günter Oberdörster; Eva Oberdörster; Jan Oberdörster
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Inhalation exposure study of titanium dioxide nanoparticles with a primary particle size of 2 to 5 nm.

Authors:  Vicki H Grassian; Patrick T O'shaughnessy; Andrea Adamcakova-Dodd; John M Pettibone; Peter S Thorne
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2006-12-04       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  23 in total

1.  Size, composition, morphology, and health implications of airborne incidental metal-containing nanoparticles.

Authors:  Natalia I Gonzalez-Pech; Larissa V Stebounova; Irem B Ustunol; Jae Hong Park; T Renee Anthony; Thomas M Peters; Vicki H Grassian
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 2.155

2.  Particle Concentrations in Occupational Settings Measured with a Nanoparticle Respiratory Deposition (NRD) Sampler.

Authors:  Larissa V Stebounova; Natalia I Gonzalez-Pech; Jae Hong Park; T Renee Anthony; Vicki H Grassian; Thomas M Peters
Journal:  Ann Work Expo Health       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 2.179

3.  Effect of Carbon Nanotubes Upon Emissions From Cutting and Sanding Carbon Fiber-Epoxy Composites.

Authors:  William A Heitbrink; Li-Ming Lo
Journal:  J Nanopart Res       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 2.253

4.  Evaluation of a diffusion charger for measuring aerosols in a workplace.

Authors:  Donna J H Vosburgh; Bon Ki Ku; Thomas M Peters
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2014-01-23

5.  Protection factor for N95 filtering facepiece respirators exposed to laboratory aerosols containing different concentrations of nanoparticles.

Authors:  Samy Rengasamy; Gary Walbert; William Newcomb; Christopher Coffey; James Terrence Wassell; Jonathan Szalajda
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2014-11-25

6.  Application of Scanning Electron Microscopy With Energy-Dispersive X-Ray Spectroscopy for Analyzing Ocular Surface Particles on Schirmer Strips.

Authors:  Anuroop Avula; Anat Galor; Patricia Blackwelder; Melissa Carballosa-Gautam; Abigail S Hackam; Bennie Jeng; Naresh Kumar
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.651

Review 7.  New Methods for Personal Exposure Monitoring for Airborne Particles.

Authors:  Kirsten A Koehler; Thomas M Peters
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2015-12

8.  Occupational exposure assessment in carbon nanotube and nanofiber primary and secondary manufacturers: mobile direct-reading sampling.

Authors:  Matthew M Dahm; Douglas E Evans; Mary K Schubauer-Berigan; M Eileen Birch; James A Deddens
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2012-10-25

9.  Refinement of the Nanoparticle Emission Assessment Technique into the Nanomaterial Exposure Assessment Technique (NEAT 2.0).

Authors:  Adrienne C Eastlake; Catherine Beaucham; Kenneth F Martinez; Matthew M Dahm; Christopher Sparks; Laura L Hodson; Charles L Geraci
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.155

10.  Exposure controls for nanomaterials at three manufacturing sites.

Authors:  William A Heitbrink; Li-Ming Lo; Kevin H Dunn
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.155

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.