Literature DB >> 24458322

Evaluation of a diffusion charger for measuring aerosols in a workplace.

Donna J H Vosburgh1, Bon Ki Ku, Thomas M Peters.   

Abstract

The model DC2000CE diffusion charger from EcoChem Analytics (League City, TX, USA) has the potential to be of considerable use to measure airborne surface area concentrations of nanoparticles in the workplace. The detection efficiency of the DC2000CE to reference instruments was determined with monodispersed spherical particles from 54 to 565.7 nm. Surface area concentrations measured by a DC2000CE were then compared to measured and detection efficiency adjusted reference surface area concentrations for polydispersed aerosols (propylene torch exhaust, incense, diesel exhaust, and Arizona road dust) over a range of particle sizes that may be encountered in a workplace. The ratio of surface area concentrations measured by the DC2000CE to that measured with the reference instruments for unimodal and multimodal aerosols ranged from 0.02 to 0.52. The ratios for detection efficiency adjusted unimodal and multimodal surface area concentrations were closer to unity (0.93-1.19) for aerosols where the majority of the surface area was within the size range of particles used to create the correction. A detection efficiency that includes the entire size range of the DC2000CE is needed before a calibration correction for the DC2000CE can be created. For diesel exhaust, the DC2000CE retained a linear response compared to reference instruments up to 2500 mm(2) m(-3), which was greater than the maximum range stated by the manufacturer (1000 mm(2) m(-3)). Physical limitations with regard to DC2000CE orientation, movement, and vibration were identified. Vibrating the DC2000CE while measuring aerosol concentrations may cause an increase of ~35 mm(2) m(-3), whereas moving the DC2000CE may cause concentrations to be inflated by as much as 400 mm(2) m(-3). Depending on the concentration of the aerosol of interest being measured, moving or vibrating a DC2000CE while measuring the aerosol should be avoided.

Entities:  

Keywords:  diffusion charger; nanoparticles; surface area monitor

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24458322      PMCID: PMC4318931          DOI: 10.1093/annhyg/met082

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg        ISSN: 0003-4878


  15 in total

1.  Comparison of mass-based and non-mass-based particle measurement systems for ultra-low emissions from automotive sources.

Authors:  Martin Mohr; Urs Lehmann; Josef Rütter
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2005-04-01       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  The mapping of fine and ultrafine particle concentrations in an engine machining and assembly facility.

Authors:  Thomas M Peters; William A Heitbrink; Douglas E Evans; Thomas J Slavin; Andrew D Maynard
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2005-12-16

3.  Total lung deposition of ultrafine particles in elderly subjects during controlled breathing.

Authors:  Chong S Kim; Peter A Jaques
Journal:  Inhal Toxicol       Date:  2005 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 2.724

4.  Mass, surface area and number metrics in diesel occupational exposure assessment.

Authors:  Gurumurthy Ramachandran; Dwane Paulsen; Winthrop Watts; David Kittelson
Journal:  J Environ Monit       Date:  2005-06-09

5.  Relationships among particle number, surface area, and respirable mass concentrations in automotive engine manufacturing.

Authors:  William A Heitbrink; Douglas E Evans; Bon Ki Ku; Andrew D Maynard; Thomas J Slavin; Thomas M Peters
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.155

6.  Pulmonary effects induced by ultrafine PTFE particles.

Authors:  C J Johnston; J N Finkelstein; P Mercer; N Corson; R Gelein; G Oberdörster
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2000-11-01       Impact factor: 4.219

7.  Association of particulate air pollution and acute mortality: involvement of ultrafine particles?

Authors:  G Oberdorster; R M Gelein; J Ferin; B Weiss
Journal:  Inhal Toxicol       Date:  1995 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.724

8.  Comparison of the DiSCmini aerosol monitor to a handheld condensation particle counter and a scanning mobility particle sizer for submicrometer sodium chloride and metal aerosols.

Authors:  Jessica B Mills; Jae Hong Park; Thomas M Peters
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.155

9.  Airborne monitoring to distinguish engineered nanomaterials from incidental particles for environmental health and safety.

Authors:  Thomas M Peters; Sherrie Elzey; Ronald Johnson; Heaweon Park; Vicki H Grassian; Tabitha Maher; Patrick O'Shaughnessy
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.155

10.  Recirculating air filtration significantly reduces exposure to airborne nanoparticles.

Authors:  David Y H Pui; Chaolong Qi; Nick Stanley; Günter Oberdörster; Andrew Maynard
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.