Literature DB >> 24918905

Exposure controls for nanomaterials at three manufacturing sites.

William A Heitbrink1, Li-Ming Lo, Kevin H Dunn.   

Abstract

Because nanomaterials are thought to be more biologically active than their larger parent compounds, careful control of exposures to nanomaterials is recommended. Field studies were conducted at three sites to develop information about the effectiveness of control measures including process changes, a downflow room, a ventilated enclosure, and an enclosed reactor. Aerosol mass and number concentrations were measured during specific operations with a photometer and an electrical mobility particle sizer to provide concentration measurements across a broad range of sizes (from 5.6 nm to 30 μm). At site A, the dust exposure and during product harvesting was eliminated by implementing a wait time of 30 -min following process completion. And, the dust exposure attributed to process tank cleaning was reduced from 0.7 to 0.2 mg/m3 by operating the available process ventilation during this task. At site B, a ventilated enclosure was used to control dust generated by the manual weigh-out and manipulation of powdered nanomaterials inside of a downflow room. Dust exposures were at room background (under 0.04 mg/m3 and 500 particles/cm3) during these tasks however, manipulations conducted outside of the enclosure were correlated with a transient increase in concentration measured at the source. At site C, a digitally controlled reactor was used to produce aligned carbon nanotubes. This reactor was a closed system and the ventilation functioned as a redundant control measure. Process emissions were well controlled by this system with the exception of increased concentrations measured during the unloading of the product. However, this emission source could be easily controlled through increasing cabinet ventilation. The identification and adoption of effective control technologies is an important first step in reducing the risk associated with worker exposure to engineered nanoparticles. Properly designing and evaluating the effectiveness of these controls is a key component in a comprehensive health and safety program.

Entities:  

Keywords:  airborne contaminants; control evaluation; engineered nanomaterials; engineering controls; hazard prevention

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 24918905      PMCID: PMC4535687          DOI: 10.1080/15459624.2014.930559

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg        ISSN: 1545-9624            Impact factor:   2.155


  25 in total

1.  A strategy for assessing workplace exposures to nanomaterials.

Authors:  Gurumurthy Ramachandran; Michele Ostraat; Douglas E Evans; Mark M Methner; Patrick O'Shaughnessy; James D'Arcy; Charles L Geraci; Edward Stevenson; Andrew Maynard; Keith Rickabaugh
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.155

2.  Exposure limits for nanoparticles: report of an international workshop on nano reference values.

Authors:  Pieter van Broekhuizen; Wim van Veelen; Willem-Henk Streekstra; Paul Schulte; Lucas Reijnders
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2012-07

Review 3.  Risk assessment and risk management of nanomaterials in the workplace: translating research to practice.

Authors:  Eileen D Kuempel; Charles L Geraci; Paul A Schulte
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2012-07

4.  Engineering case reports. Effectiveness of local exhaust ventilation (LEV) in controlling engineered nanomaterial emissions during reactor cleanout operations.

Authors:  Mark M Methner
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.155

5.  Exposure to manufactured nanoparticles in different workplaces.

Authors:  Derk Brouwer
Journal:  Toxicology       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 4.221

6.  Exposure assessment of carbon nanotube manufacturing workplaces.

Authors:  Ji Hyun Lee; Seung-Bok Lee; Gwi Nam Bae; Ki Soo Jeon; Jin Uk Yoon; Jun Ho Ji; Jae Hyuck Sung; Byung Gyu Lee; Jong Han Lee; Jung Sun Yang; Hyeon Yeong Kim; Chang Soo Kang; Il Je Yu
Journal:  Inhal Toxicol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.724

7.  Effectiveness of a custom-fitted flange and local exhaust ventilation (LEV) system in controlling the release of nanoscale metal oxide particulates during reactor cleanout operations.

Authors:  Mark M Methner
Journal:  Int J Occup Environ Health       Date:  2010 Oct-Dec

8.  Characterization and control of airborne particles emitted during production of epoxy/carbon nanotube nanocomposites.

Authors:  Lorenzo G Cena; Thomas M Peters
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.155

9.  Exposure assessment of workplaces manufacturing nanosized TiO2 and silver.

Authors:  Ji Hyun Lee; Miran Kwon; Jun Ho Ji; Chang Soo Kang; Kang Ho Ahn; Jeong Hee Han; Il Je Yu
Journal:  Inhal Toxicol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.724

10.  Potential for occupational exposure to engineered carbon-based nanomaterials in environmental laboratory studies.

Authors:  David R Johnson; Mark M Methner; Alan J Kennedy; Jeffery A Steevens
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  8 in total

1.  Deposition of graphene nanomaterial aerosols in human upper airways.

Authors:  Wei-Chung Su; Bon Ki Ku; Pramod Kulkarni; Yung Sung Cheng
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 2.  Toxicology data of graphene-family nanomaterials: an update.

Authors:  Feng Xiaoli; Chen Qiyue; Guo Weihong; Zhang Yaqing; Hu Chen; Wu Junrong; Shao Longquan
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 5.153

3.  Aerosol Emission Monitoring and Assessment of Potential Exposure to Multi-walled Carbon Nanotubes in the Manufacture of Polymer Nanocomposites.

Authors:  Drew Thompson; Sheng-Chieh Chen; Jing Wang; David Y H Pui
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2015-07-23

4.  Performance evaluation of mobile downflow booths for reducing airborne particles in the workplace.

Authors:  Li-Ming Lo; Braden Hocker; Austin E Steltz; John Kremer; H Amy Feng
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 5.  Review of techniques and studies characterizing the release of carbon nanotubes from nanocomposites: Implications for exposure and human health risk assessment.

Authors:  Michael Kovochich; Cha-Chen David Fung; Raghavendhran Avanasi; Amy K Madl
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 5.563

6.  Particle Emissions from Laboratory Activities Involving Carbon Nanotubes.

Authors:  Li-Ming Lo; Candace S-J Tsai; William A Heitbrink; Kevin H Dunn; Jennifer Topmiller; Michael Ellenbecker
Journal:  J Nanopart Res       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 2.253

7.  Differences in inflammation and acute phase response but similar genotoxicity in mice following pulmonary exposure to graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide.

Authors:  Stefan Bengtson; Kristina B Knudsen; Zdenka O Kyjovska; Trine Berthing; Vidar Skaug; Marcus Levin; Ismo K Koponen; Abhay Shivayogimath; Timothy J Booth; Beatriz Alonso; Amaia Pesquera; Amaia Zurutuza; Birthe L Thomsen; Jesper T Troelsen; Nicklas R Jacobsen; Ulla Vogel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Toxicologic Concerns with Current Medical Nanoparticles.

Authors:  Tsai-Mu Cheng; Hsiu-Yi Chu; Haw-Ming Huang; Zi-Lin Li; Chiang-Ying Chen; Ya-Jung Shih; Jacqueline Whang-Peng; R Holland Cheng; Ju-Ku Mo; Hung-Yun Lin; Kuan Wang
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 6.208

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.