Literature DB >> 27027845

Refinement of the Nanoparticle Emission Assessment Technique into the Nanomaterial Exposure Assessment Technique (NEAT 2.0).

Adrienne C Eastlake1, Catherine Beaucham1, Kenneth F Martinez2, Matthew M Dahm1, Christopher Sparks3, Laura L Hodson1, Charles L Geraci1.   

Abstract

Engineered nanomaterial emission and exposure characterization studies have been completed at more than 60 different facilities by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). These experiences have provided NIOSH the opportunity to refine an earlier published technique, the Nanoparticle Emission Assessment Technique (NEAT 1.0), into a more comprehensive technique for assessing worker and workplace exposures to engineered nanomaterials. This change is reflected in the new name Nanomaterial Exposure Assessment Technique (NEAT 2.0) which distinguishes it from NEAT 1.0. NEAT 2.0 places a stronger emphasis on time-integrated, filter-based sampling (i.e., elemental mass analysis and particle morphology) in the worker's breathing zone (full shift and task specific) and area samples to develop job exposure matrices. NEAT 2.0 includes a comprehensive assessment of emissions at processes and job tasks, using direct-reading instruments (i.e., particle counters) in data-logging mode to better understand peak emission periods. Evaluation of worker practices, ventilation efficacy, and other engineering exposure control systems and risk management strategies serve to allow for a comprehensive exposure assessment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Emission; NEAT; nanomaterial; occupational exposure assessment; sampling

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27027845      PMCID: PMC4956539          DOI: 10.1080/15459624.2016.1167278

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg        ISSN: 1545-9624            Impact factor:   2.155


  26 in total

1.  Evaluation of the potential airborne release of carbon nanofibers during the preparation, grinding, and cutting of epoxy-based nanocomposite material.

Authors:  M Methner; C Crawford; C Geraci
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.155

2.  Nanoparticle emission assessment technique (NEAT) for the identification and measurement of potential inhalation exposure to engineered nanomaterials--part A.

Authors:  M Methner; L Hodson; C Geraci
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.155

3.  Engineering case reports. Effectiveness of local exhaust ventilation (LEV) in controlling engineered nanomaterial emissions during reactor cleanout operations.

Authors:  Mark M Methner
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 4.  Significance of particle parameters in the evaluation of exposure-dose-response relationships of inhaled particles.

Authors:  G Oberdorster
Journal:  Inhal Toxicol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.724

5.  Pulmonary toxicity of single-wall carbon nanotubes in mice 7 and 90 days after intratracheal instillation.

Authors:  Chiu-Wing Lam; John T James; Richard McCluskey; Robert L Hunter
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2003-09-26       Impact factor: 4.849

6.  Sequential exposure to carbon nanotubes and bacteria enhances pulmonary inflammation and infectivity.

Authors:  Anna A Shvedova; James P Fabisiak; Elena R Kisin; Ashley R Murray; Jenny R Roberts; Yulia Y Tyurina; James M Antonini; Wei Hong Feng; Choudari Kommineni; Jeffrey Reynolds; Aaron Barchowsky; Vince Castranova; Valerian E Kagan
Journal:  Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol       Date:  2007-12-20       Impact factor: 6.914

7.  Inhalation vs. aspiration of single-walled carbon nanotubes in C57BL/6 mice: inflammation, fibrosis, oxidative stress, and mutagenesis.

Authors:  A A Shvedova; E Kisin; A R Murray; V J Johnson; O Gorelik; S Arepalli; A F Hubbs; R R Mercer; P Keohavong; N Sussman; J Jin; J Yin; S Stone; B T Chen; G Deye; A Maynard; V Castranova; P A Baron; V E Kagan
Journal:  Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol       Date:  2008-07-25       Impact factor: 5.464

8.  Carbon nanotubes introduced into the abdominal cavity of mice show asbestos-like pathogenicity in a pilot study.

Authors:  Craig A Poland; Rodger Duffin; Ian Kinloch; Andrew Maynard; William A H Wallace; Anthony Seaton; Vicki Stone; Simon Brown; William Macnee; Ken Donaldson
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 39.213

Review 9.  Toward advancing nano-object count metrology: a best practice framework.

Authors:  Scott C Brown; Volodymyr Boyko; Greg Meyers; Matthias Voetz; Wendel Wohlleben
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2013-09-27       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Concern-driven integrated approaches to nanomaterial testing and assessment--report of the NanoSafety Cluster Working Group 10.

Authors:  Agnes G Oomen; Peter M J Bos; Teresa F Fernandes; Kerstin Hund-Rinke; Diana Boraschi; Hugh J Byrne; Karin Aschberger; Stefania Gottardo; Frank von der Kammer; Dana Kühnel; Danail Hristozov; Antonio Marcomini; Lucia Migliore; Janeck Scott-Fordsmand; Peter Wick; Robert Landsiedel
Journal:  Nanotoxicology       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 5.913

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Occupational Exposures to Engineered Nanomaterials: a Review of Workplace Exposure Assessment Methods.

Authors:  Seth McCormick; Mamadou Niang; Matthew M Dahm
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2021-06-08

2.  'Safe handling of nanotechnology' ten years on.

Authors:  Andrew D Maynard; Robert J Aitken
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 39.213

Review 3.  Biological monitoring of workers exposed to engineered nanomaterials.

Authors:  P Schulte; V Leso; M Niang; I Iavicoli
Journal:  Toxicol Lett       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 4.372

4.  NIOSH field studies team assessment: Worker exposure to aerosolized metal oxide nanoparticles in a semiconductor fabrication facility.

Authors:  Sara A Brenner; Nicole M Neu-Baker; Adrienne C Eastlake; Catherine C Beaucham; Charles L Geraci
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.155

5.  Nanomaterials, a New Challenge in the Workplace.

Authors:  Ana Rita Alberto; Cristina Matos; Gabriel Carmona-Aparicio; Muriel Iten
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 2.622

6.  Evaluation of total and inhalable samplers for the collection of carbon nanotube and carbon nanofiber aerosols.

Authors:  Matthew M Dahm; Douglas E Evans; Stephen Bertke; Sergey A Grinshpun
Journal:  Aerosol Sci Technol       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 2.908

7.  Results of the 2019 Survey of Engineered Nanomaterial Occupational Health and Safety Practices.

Authors:  Nicole M Neu-Baker; Adrienne Eastlake; Laura Hodson
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 4.614

8.  Occupational Safety Analysis for COVID-Instigated Repurposed Manufacturing Lines: Use of Nanomaterials in Injection Moulding.

Authors:  Spyridon Damilos; Stratos Saliakas; Ioannis Kokkinopoulos; Panagiotis Karayannis; Melpo Karamitrou; Aikaterini-Flora Trompeta; Costas Charitidis; Elias P Koumoulos
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 4.967

9.  Exposures during wet production and use processes of nanomaterials: a summary of 11 worksite evaluations.

Authors:  Eric Glassford; Nicole M Neu-Baker; Kevin L Dunn; Kevin H Dunn
Journal:  Ind Health       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 2.179

10.  Exposure to airborne particles associated with the handling of graphene nanoplatelets.

Authors:  Andrea Spinazzè; Andrea Cattaneo; Francesca Borghi; Luca Del Buono; Davide Campagnolo; Sabrina Rovelli; Domenico Maria Cavallo
Journal:  Med Lav       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 1.275

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.