Literature DB >> 19026822

Low thromboembolic risk for patients with the Heartmate II left ventricular assist device.

Ranjit John1, Forum Kamdar, Kenneth Liao, Monica Colvin-Adams, Leslie Miller, Lyle Joyce, Andrew Boyle.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Thromboembolic events can occur in up to 20% of patients with a left ventricular assist device. The aggressive use of anticoagulation with newer continuous-flow devices has potentially increased the risk of postoperative bleeding. The predecessor of the HeartMate II left ventricular assist device, the HeartMate XVE (Thoratec Corp, Pleasanton, Calif), was associated with an extremely low thromboembolic risk, even without anticoagulation, because of its unique textured surfaces. Even though several areas of the HeartMate II are textured, a protocol was adopted for this new axial flow pump requiring long-term anticoagulation with warfarin. In our study, we investigated whether the HeartMate II left ventricular assist device is associated with a similarly low thromboembolic risk as the HeartMate XVE.
METHODS: At our institution, 45 patients (mean age, 57.24 +/- 14.2 years) underwent implantation of the HeartMate II; 30 underwent bridge-to-transplantation therapy, 7 underwent destination therapy, and 8 underwent left ventricular assist device exchange for a failed XVE left ventricular assist device. Total duration of HeartMate II support was 352.13 patient-months (mean duration, 7.2 +/- 5.2 months). All 45 patients were treated postoperatively with warfarin and aspirin. We recorded use of these 2 medications and monthly international normalized ratios. Prospectively, we also monitored patients for any clinical thromboembolic events and for pump thrombus.
RESULTS: Of our 45 study patients, 41 had a mean international normalized ratio of less than 2.0; of those 41 patients, 21 had a mean international normalized ratio of less than 1.6. Because of recurrent gastrointestinal bleeding episodes, 7 patients discontinued warfarin for a total duration of 39.1 patient-months. During the entire period of HeartMate II support, we noted 1 thromboembolic event. In addition, another patient had a suspected left ventricular assist device pump thrombus that resolved with a high-intensity heparin anticoagulation protocol (international normalized ratio, 1.3).
CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary single-center analysis suggests that the HeartMate II is associated with an extremely low thromboembolic risk and with less stringent requirements for anticoagulation. Selected patients at high risk for bleeding can be safely followed with either no or extremely low anticoagulation requirements for prolonged periods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19026822     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.12.077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  37 in total

Review 1.  Physiologic and pathologic changes in patients with continuous-flow ventricular assist devices.

Authors:  Ranjit John; Andrew Boyle; Frank Pagani; Leslie Miller
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  Ventricular assist devices: initial orientation.

Authors:  Martin Schweiger; Hitendu Dave; Frithjof Lemme; Olga Romanchenko; Michael Hofmann; Michael Hübler
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 3.  Management of aortic insufficiency in the continuous flow left ventricular assist device population.

Authors:  Jonathan Holtz; Jeffrey Teuteberg
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2014-03

Review 4.  Ventricular assist devices (VAD) therapy: new technology, new hope?

Authors:  Limael E Rodriguez; Erik E Suarez; Matthias Loebe; Brian A Bruckner
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2013 Jan-Mar

5.  Ventricular Assist Device Implantation Configurations Impact Overall Mechanical Circulatory Support System Thrombogenic Potential.

Authors:  Wei-Che Chiu; Yared Alemu; Allison J McLarty; Shmuel Einav; Marvin J Slepian; Danny Bluestein
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2017 May/Jun       Impact factor: 2.872

Review 6.  In Vitro models for thrombogenicity testing of blood-recirculating medical devices.

Authors:  Deepika N Sarode; Shuvo Roy
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 3.166

7.  Sequential cataract surgeries in a patient with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD).

Authors:  Alina Yang; Ji Liu
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2018-03-16

Review 8.  Devices in the management of advanced, chronic heart failure.

Authors:  William T Abraham; Sakima A Smith
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 32.419

9.  Association between cell-derived microparticles and adverse events in patients with nonpulsatile left ventricular assist devices.

Authors:  Angelo Nascimbene; Ruben Hernandez; Joggy K George; Anita Parker; Angela L Bergeron; Subhashree Pradhan; K Vinod Vijayan; Andrew Civitello; Leo Simpson; Maria Nawrot; Vei-Vei Lee; Hari R Mallidi; Reynolds M Delgado; Jing Fei Dong; O H Frazier
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2014-01-19       Impact factor: 10.247

10.  Early thrombus in a HeartMate II left ventricular assist device: a potential cause of hemolysis and diagnostic dilemma.

Authors:  Castigliano M Bhamidipati; Gorav Ailawadi; James Bergin; John A Kern
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2009-11-27       Impact factor: 5.209

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.