Literature DB >> 19023835

Potential reduced exposure products (PREPs) for smokeless tobacco users: clinical evaluation methodology.

Jennifer N Gray1, Alison B Breland, Michael Weaver, Thomas Eissenberg.   

Abstract

Several potential reduced exposure products (PREPs) for smokeless tobacco (SLT) users are marketed in the United States, though their effects are largely unknown. These products include some that are low in tobacco-specific nitrosamines (TSNs), like Stonewall, a pressed tobacco tablet, and General snus, a moist snuff product produced in Sweden. Methodology assessing the toxicant exposure and effects of cigarette-like PREPs for smokers has been developed, and might be modified for use in evaluating PREPs for SLT users. This report describes two studies examining the toxicant exposure and effects of two PREPs for SLT users. Study 1 (n = 13) consisted of four 4.5-hr laboratory sessions where SLT products (own brand, Stonewall, General snus, and tobacco-free placebo) were used for four 30-min episodes and nicotine exposure and tobacco/nicotine abstinence symptoms were measured. Study 2 (n = 19) consisted of four 5-day ad libitum use periods when participants used own brand, Stonewall, General snus, or no SLT and urinary levels of metabolites of nicotine (cotinine) and the TSN 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone (NNAL) and abstinence symptoms were measured. Compared with own brand, Stonewall was associated with lower levels of cotinine and NNAL, while General snus was associated with similar levels of cotinine and lower levels of NNAL. Abstinence symptoms generally did not differ across tobacco conditions. These results show that clinical laboratory methods can be used to evaluate the toxicant exposure and abstinence symptom suppression associated with PREPs for SLT users.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19023835      PMCID: PMC3212707          DOI: 10.1080/14622200802323258

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res        ISSN: 1462-2203            Impact factor:   4.244


  25 in total

1.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of moist snuff in humans.

Authors:  R V Fant; J E Henningfield; R A Nelson; W B Pickworth
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 2.  Methods to assess potential reduced exposure products.

Authors:  Dorothy K Hatsukami; Gary A Giovino; Thomas Eissenberg; Pamela I Clark; Deirdre Lawrence; Scott Leischow
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.244

Review 3.  Biochemistry, biology, and carcinogenicity of tobacco-specific N-nitrosamines.

Authors:  S S Hecht
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.739

4.  Two large prospective studies of mortality among men who use snuff or chewing tobacco (United States).

Authors:  S Jane Henley; Michael J Thun; Cari Connell; Eugenia E Calle
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.506

5.  Nicotine pharmacokinetics and subjective effects of three potential reduced exposure products, moist snuff and nicotine lozenge.

Authors:  Michael Kotlyar; M Irene Mendoza-Baumgart; Zhong-ze Li; Paul R Pentel; Brianne C Barnett; Rachel M Feuer; Erin A Smith; Dorothy K Hatsukami
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 7.552

6.  Treatment of spit tobacco users with transdermal nicotine system and mint snuff.

Authors:  D K Hatsukami; M Grillo; R Boyle; S Allen; J Jensen; R Bliss; S Brown
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2000-04

7.  Tobacco-specific nitrosamines in new tobacco products.

Authors:  Irina Stepanov; Joni Jensen; Dorothy Hatsukami; Stephen S Hecht
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.244

8.  Clinical laboratory evaluation of potential reduced exposure products for smokers.

Authors:  Alison B Breland; Bethea A Kleykamp; Thomas Eissenberg
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.244

Review 9.  The changing cigarette, 1950-1995.

Authors:  D Hoffmann; I Hoffmann
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health       Date:  1997-03

10.  Nicotine lozenges for the treatment of smokeless tobacco use.

Authors:  Jon O Ebbert; Lowell C Dale; Herbert Severson; Ivana T Croghan; Donna F Rasmussen; Darrell R Schroeder; Mark W Vander Weg; Richard D Hurt
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.244

View more
  15 in total

1.  A clinical laboratory model for evaluating the acute effects of electronic "cigarettes": nicotine delivery profile and cardiovascular and subjective effects.

Authors:  Andrea R Vansickel; Caroline O Cobb; Michael F Weaver; Thomas E Eissenberg
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 2.  Measures for assessing subjective effects of potential reduced-exposure products.

Authors:  Karen Hanson; Richard O'Connor; Dorothy Hatsukami
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Animal models to assess the abuse liability of tobacco products: effects of smokeless tobacco extracts on intracranial self-stimulation.

Authors:  Andrew C Harris; Laura Tally; Clare E Schmidt; Peter Muelken; Irina Stepanov; Subhrakanti Saha; Rachel Isaksson Vogel; Mark G LeSage
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 4.492

4.  Subjective responses to oral tobacco products: scale validation.

Authors:  Dorothy K Hatsukami; Yan Zhang; Richard J O'Connor; Herb H Severson
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 4.244

5.  Acute effects of snus in never-tobacco users: a pilot study.

Authors:  Jenny E Ozga; Nicholas J Felicione; Daniel Elswick; Melissa D Blank
Journal:  Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 3.829

6.  Dependence on tobacco and nicotine products: a case for product-specific assessment.

Authors:  Karl Fagerström; Thomas Eissenberg
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 4.244

7.  Nicotine Absorption from Smokeless Tobacco Modified to Adjust pH.

Authors:  Wallace B Pickworth; Zachary R Rosenberry; Wyatt Gold; Bartosz Koszowski
Journal:  J Addict Res Ther       Date:  2014-04

Review 8.  Abuse liability assessment of tobacco products including potential reduced exposure products.

Authors:  Lawrence P Carter; Maxine L Stitzer; Jack E Henningfield; Rich J O'Connor; K Michael Cummings; Dorothy K Hatsukami
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 9.  Clinical trials methods for evaluation of potential reduced exposure products.

Authors:  Dorothy K Hatsukami; Karen Hanson; Anna Briggs; Mark Parascandola; Jeanine M Genkinger; Richard O'Connor; Peter G Shields
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.254

10.  Evaluating the acute effects of oral, non-combustible potential reduced exposure products marketed to smokers.

Authors:  C O Cobb; M F Weaver; T Eissenberg
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2009-04-02       Impact factor: 7.552

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.