Literature DB >> 19022427

Looking back: egg donors' retrospective evaluations of their motivations, expectations, and experiences during their first donation cycle.

Nancy J Kenney1, Michelle L McGowan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To survey motivations, expectations, and experiences of egg donors in the United States and their assessments of physical, psychological, and social after-effects of their donation(s).
DESIGN: Questionnaire comprising open-ended and multiple-choice items, administered on the Internet or by mail. PARTICIPANT(S): A total of 80 women who first donated eggs between 1989 and 2002 (at least 2 years before survey completion) in 20 states. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Self-report questionnaire assessing donors' demographic characteristics, their initial awareness of and interest in egg donation, first egg donation experience, and reflections on it. RESULT(S): Participants cited both altruistic and financial reasons for becoming egg donors. Donors' self-reported awareness of physical risks before their first donation was not well-matched with the physical side effects they actually experienced. Psychological risk awareness before donation reflected more challenging outcomes than the women actually experienced. The majority of donors reported postdonation satisfaction, although a minority reported long-term physical and psychological concerns that they attribute to having donated eggs. CONCLUSION(S): These data offer a comprehensive overview of issues important to the recruitment and well-being of egg donors and suggest some issues related to the donor's satisfaction with the process and to their long-term health for future study. Copyright 2010 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19022427     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.09.081

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  20 in total

1.  How Agencies Market Egg Donation on the Internet: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Jason Keehn; Eve Howell; Mark V Sauer; Robert Klitzman
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.718

2.  Selling blood and gametes during tough economic times: insights from Google search.

Authors:  Jonathan A Wu; Tin C Ngo; Cappy Rothman; Benjamin N Breyer; Michael L Eisenberg
Journal:  Can J Urol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.344

3.  Attitudes toward strategies to increase organ donation: views of the general public and health professionals.

Authors:  Lianne Barnieh; Scott Klarenbach; John S Gill; Tim Caulfield; Braden Manns
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 8.237

4.  Egg donation brokers: an analysis of agency versus in vitro fertilization clinic websites.

Authors:  Eve Holwell; Jason Keehn; Cheng-shiun Leu; Mark V Sauer; Robert Klitzman
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 0.142

5.  Experiences and psychological outcomes of the oocyte donor: a survey of donors post-donation from one center.

Authors:  Jennifer K Blakemore; Paxton Voigt; Mindy R Schiffman; Shelley Lee; Andria G Besser; M Elizabeth Fino
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-07-13       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Exploring Motivations, Awareness of Side Effects, and Attitudes among Potential Egg Donors.

Authors:  Lindsay B Gezinski; Sharvari Karandikar; James Carter; Melinda White
Journal:  Health Soc Work       Date:  2016-05

7.  Psychiatric Symptoms Associated with Oocyte-Donation.

Authors:  Ashraf Kazemi; Maryam Zivari Delavar; Gholamreza Kheirabadi
Journal:  Psychiatr Q       Date:  2016-12

8.  Advocating for longitudinal follow-up of the health and welfare of egg donors.

Authors:  Molly Woodriff; Mark V Sauer; Robert Klitzman
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  Racial and ethnic disparities among donor oocyte banks in the United States.

Authors:  Shelun Tsai; Esther H Chung; Tracy Truong; Amanda S Farrell; Jenny Wu; Onyinye Ohamadike; Jennifer L Eaton
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 7.490

10.  Gamete donors' satisfaction; gender differences and similarities among oocyte and sperm donors in a national sample.

Authors:  Agneta Skoog Svanberg; Claudia Lampic; Ann-Louise Gejerwall; Johannes Gudmundsson; Per-Olof Karlström; Nils-Gunnar Solensten; Gunilla Sydsjö
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 3.636

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.