Literature DB >> 26479570

How Agencies Market Egg Donation on the Internet: A Qualitative Study.

Jason Keehn1, Eve Howell2, Mark V Sauer3, Robert Klitzman4.   

Abstract

We systematically examined the content of the websites of 46 agencies that buy and sell human eggs to understand how they market themselves to both donors and recipients. We found that these websites use marketing techniques that obscure the realities of egg donation, presenting egg donation as a mutually beneficial and fulfilling experience. Sites emphasize egg donors' emotional fulfillment (71.4%) and address recipients' anxieties by stressing the ability to find the perfect "fit" or "match" (56.5%), suiting recipients'"preferences"/"desires" (19.6%), and even designing/customizing a child (15.2%). Agencies attempt to create a sense of connection between the recipients and donors by reporting donors' personal characteristics - e.g., interests/hobbies (63%), traits (34.8%), mood/temperament (20%), and self-reported childhood behavior/memories (15%). Sites present donors as caring/generous (54.3%) and smart/successful/beautiful. These data, the first to examine several key aspects of egg donation agency websites, reveal critical aspects of how these companies communicate to prospective donors and recipients, raising several ethical concerns. Websites frame information in ways that may bias consumers, making emotional appeals that may distract from appropriate risk/benefit assessments and obscure the ethical challenges of egg donation. These data highlight needs for improved practices, adherence to guidelines, and consideration of enhanced guidelines or policy.
© 2015 American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26479570      PMCID: PMC4663984          DOI: 10.1111/jlme.12303

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Law Med Ethics        ISSN: 1073-1105            Impact factor:   1.718


  15 in total

1.  Exploring ovum donors' motivations and needs.

Authors:  A M Braverman
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 11.229

Review 2.  Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the world wide web: a systematic review.

Authors:  Gunther Eysenbach; John Powell; Oliver Kuss; Eun-Ryoung Sa
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002 May 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Self-regulation, compensation, and the ethical recruitment of oocyte donors.

Authors:  Aaron D Levine
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.683

4.  Quality of health information on the Internet in pediatric neuro-oncology.

Authors:  Darren R Hargrave; Ursula A Hargrave; Eric Bouffet
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2006-03-02       Impact factor: 12.300

5.  Disclosure of information to potential subjects on research recruitment web sites.

Authors:  Robert Klitzman; Ilene Albala; Joseph Siragusa; Jignasha Patel; Paul S Appelbaum
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb

6.  Evaluation of compliance and range of fees among American Society for Reproductive Medicine-listed egg donor and surrogacy agencies.

Authors:  Janelle Luk; John C Petrozza
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 0.142

7.  Psychological characteristics and factors related to willingness to donate again among anonymous oocyte donors.

Authors:  Susan Caruso Klock; Jan Elman Stout; Marie Davidson
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Perspectives on quality and content of information on the internet for adolescents with cancer.

Authors:  Jennifer N Stinson; Meghan White; Vicky Breakey; Amy Lee Chong; Isabella Mak; Kazuo Koekebakker Low; Anja Koekebakker Low
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 3.167

9.  DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices.

Authors:  D Charnock; S Shepperd; G Needham; R Gann
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.710

10.  Looking back: egg donors' retrospective evaluations of their motivations, expectations, and experiences during their first donation cycle.

Authors:  Nancy J Kenney; Michelle L McGowan
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2008-11-19       Impact factor: 7.329

View more
  3 in total

1.  Oocyte Biobanks: Old Assumptions and New Challenges.

Authors:  Pamela Tozzo
Journal:  BioTech (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-18

2.  Screening of gestational carriers in the United States.

Authors:  Erika L Fuchs; Abbey B Berenson
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Buying and selling human eggs: infertility providers' ethical and other concerns regarding egg donor agencies.

Authors:  Robert Klitzman
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 2.652

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.