Literature DB >> 19021260

Are apes inequity averse? New data on the token-exchange paradigm.

Juliane Bräuer1, Josep Call, Michael Tomasello.   

Abstract

Recent studies have produced mixed evidence about inequity aversion in nonhuman primates. Brosnan et al. [Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences 272:253-258, 2005] found inequity aversion in chimpanzees and argued that effort is crucial, if subjects are to evaluate how they are rewarded in comparison to a competitor for an identical performance. In this study we investigated inequity aversion with chimpanzees, bonobos and orangutans, using the method of Brosnan et al. [Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences 272:253-258, 2005] after introducing some methodological improvements. Subjects always received a less-preferred food in exchange for a token, whereas the competitor received either the same type of food for their token (equity) or a more favored food for it (inequity). Apes did not refuse more of the less-preferred food when a competitor had received the more favored food. Thus, with an improved methodology we failed to reproduce the findings of Brosnan et al. [Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences 272:253-258, 2005] that apes show inequity aversion. (c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19021260     DOI: 10.1002/ajp.20639

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Primatol        ISSN: 0275-2565            Impact factor:   2.371


  37 in total

1.  Human children but not chimpanzees make irrational decisions driven by social comparison.

Authors:  Esther Herrmann; Lou M Haux; Henriette Zeidler; Jan M Engelmann
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Personality influences responses to inequity and contrast in chimpanzees.

Authors:  Sarah F Brosnan; Lydia M Hopper; Sean Richey; Hani D Freeman; Catherine F Talbot; Samuel D Gosling; Susan P Lambeth; Steven J Schapiro
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 2.844

3.  Squirrel monkeys' response to inequitable outcomes indicates a behavioural convergence within the primates.

Authors:  Catherine F Talbot; Hani D Freeman; Lawrence E Williams; Sarah F Brosnan
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 4.  Prosocial primates: selfish and unselfish motivations.

Authors:  Frans B M de Waal; Malini Suchak
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-09-12       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Lack of prosociality in great apes, capuchin monkeys and spider monkeys: convergent evidence from two different food distribution tasks.

Authors:  Federica Amici; Elisabetta Visalberghi; Josep Call
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Mechanisms underlying responses to inequitable outcomes in chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes.

Authors:  Sarah F Brosnan; Catherine Talbot; Megan Ahlgren; Susan P Lambeth; Steven J Schapiro
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 2.844

7.  Inequity aversion strategies between marmosets are influenced by partner familiarity and sex but not oxytocin.

Authors:  Aaryn C Mustoe; April M Harnisch; Benjamin Hochfelder; Jon Cavanaugh; Jeffrey A French
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 2.844

8.  Social disappointment explains chimpanzees' behaviour in the inequity aversion task.

Authors:  Jan M Engelmann; Jeremy B Clift; Esther Herrmann; Michael Tomasello
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Theft in an ultimatum game: chimpanzees and bonobos are insensitive to unfairness.

Authors:  Ingrid Kaiser; Keith Jensen; Josep Call; Michael Tomasello
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 3.703

10.  Anti-equality: social comparison in young children.

Authors:  Mark Sheskin; Paul Bloom; Karen Wynn
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2013-11-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.