Literature DB >> 27011389

Mechanisms underlying responses to inequitable outcomes in chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes.

Sarah F Brosnan1, Catherine Talbot2, Megan Ahlgren3, Susan P Lambeth3, Steven J Schapiro3.   

Abstract

Several species of nonhuman primates respond negatively to inequitable outcomes, a trait shared with humans. Despite previous research, questions regarding the response to inequity remain. In this study, we replicated the methodology from previous studies to address four questions related to inequity. First, we explored the impact of basic social factors. Second, we addressed whether negative responses to inequity require a task, or exist when rewards are given for 'free'. Third, we addressed whether differences in the experimental procedure or the level of effort required to obtain a reward affected responses. Finally, we explored the interaction between 'individual' expectations (based on one's own previous experience) and 'social' expectations (based on the partner's experience). These questions were investigated in 16 socially housed adult chimpanzees using eight conditions that varied across the dimensions of reward, effort and procedure. Subjects did respond to inequity, but only in the context of a task. Differences in procedure and level of effort required did not cause individuals to change their behaviour. Males were more sensitive to social than to individual expectation, while females were more sensitive to individual expectation. Finally, subjects also increased refusals when they received a better reward than their partner, which has not been documented previously. These results indicate that chimpanzees are more sensitive to reward inequity than procedures, and that there is interaction between social and individual expectations that depends upon social factors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pan troglodytes; chimpanzee; expectation; inequity; prosocial behaviour; sex difference

Year:  2010        PMID: 27011389      PMCID: PMC4801319          DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.02.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Behav        ISSN: 0003-3472            Impact factor:   2.844


  31 in total

1.  Animal behaviour: fair refusal by capuchin monkeys.

Authors:  Clive D L Wynne
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-03-11       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Are capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) inequity averse?

Authors:  Diane Dubreuil; Maria Silvia Gentile; Elisabetta Visalberghi
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Capuchin monkeys are sensitive to others' welfare.

Authors:  Venkat R Lakshminarayanan; Laurie R Santos
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2008-11-11       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Chimpanzees are indifferent to the welfare of unrelated group members.

Authors:  Joan B Silk; Sarah F Brosnan; Jennifer Vonk; Joseph Henrich; Daniel J Povinelli; Amanda S Richardson; Susan P Lambeth; Jenny Mascaro; Steven J Schapiro
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-10-27       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others.

Authors:  Tania Singer; Ben Seymour; John P O'Doherty; Klaas E Stephan; Raymond J Dolan; Chris D Frith
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-01-18       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Socially learned preferences for differentially rewarded tokens in the brown capuchin monkey (Cebus apella).

Authors:  Sarah F Brosnan; Frans B M de Waal
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.231

7.  Monkeys reject unequal pay.

Authors:  Sarah F Brosnan; Frans B M De Waal
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-09-18       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Detrimental effects of sanctions on human altruism.

Authors:  Ernst Fehr; Bettina Rockenbach
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-03-13       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Giving is self-rewarding for monkeys.

Authors:  Frans B M de Waal; Kristin Leimgruber; Amanda R Greenberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-08-29       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Spontaneous altruism by chimpanzees and young children.

Authors:  Felix Warneken; Brian Hare; Alicia P Melis; Daniel Hanus; Michael Tomasello
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2007-06-26       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  28 in total

1.  Human children but not chimpanzees make irrational decisions driven by social comparison.

Authors:  Esther Herrmann; Lou M Haux; Henriette Zeidler; Jan M Engelmann
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Social disappointment explains chimpanzees' behaviour in the inequity aversion task.

Authors:  Jan M Engelmann; Jeremy B Clift; Esther Herrmann; Michael Tomasello
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Evolutionary foundations of human prosocial sentiments.

Authors:  Joan B Silk; Bailey R House
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Behavioral responses to inequity in reward distribution and working effort in crows and ravens.

Authors:  Claudia A F Wascher; Thomas Bugnyar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Domestication Does Not Explain the Presence of Inequity Aversion in Dogs.

Authors:  Jennifer L Essler; Sarah Marshall-Pescini; Friederike Range
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 6.  What behaviour in economic games tells us about the evolution of non-human species' economic decision-making behaviour.

Authors:  Sarah F Brosnan
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  When less is more: evolutionary origins of the affect heuristic.

Authors:  Jerald D Kralik; Eric R Xu; Emily J Knight; Sara A Khan; William J Levine
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Exploring the Cognitive Capacities of Japanese Macaques in a Cooperation Game.

Authors:  Ryan Sigmundson; Mathieu S Stribos; Roy Hammer; Julia Herzele; Lena S Pflüger; Jorg J M Massen
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 2.752

9.  The co-evolution of fairness preferences and costly punishment.

Authors:  Moritz Hetzer; Didier Sornette
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  New Caledonian crows rapidly solve a collaborative problem without cooperative cognition.

Authors:  Sarah A Jelbert; Puja J Singh; Russell D Gray; Alex H Taylor
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.