Literature DB >> 16277285

Variations in normal color vision. IV. Binary hues and hue scaling.

Gokhan Malkoc1, Paul Kay, Michael A Webster.   

Abstract

We used hue cancellation and focal naming to compare individual differences in stimuli selected for unique hues (e.g., pure blue or green) and binary hues (e.g., blue-green). Standard models assume that binary hues depend on the component responses of red-green and blue-yellow processes. However, variance was comparable for unique and binary hues, and settings across categories showed little correlation. Thus, the choices for the binary mixtures are poorly predicted by the unique hue settings. Hue scaling was used to compare individual differences both within and between categories. Ratings for distant stimuli were again independent, while neighboring stimuli covaried and revealed clusters near the poles of the LvsM and SvsLM cardinal axes. While individual differences were large, mean focal choices for red, blue-green, yellow-green, and (to a lesser extent) purple fall near the cardinal axes, such that the cardinal axes roughly delineate the boundaries for blue vs. green and yellow vs. green categories. This suggests a weak tie between the cone-opponent axes and the structure of color appearance.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16277285     DOI: 10.1364/josaa.22.002154

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis        ISSN: 1084-7529            Impact factor:   2.129


  15 in total

1.  Early visual mechanisms do not contribute to synesthetic color experience.

Authors:  Sang Wook Hong; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  How to use individual differences to isolate functional organization, biology, and utility of visual functions; with illustrative proposals for stereopsis.

Authors:  Jeremy B Wilmer
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  2008

3.  Variations in normal color vision. VII. Relationships between color naming and hue scaling.

Authors:  Kara J Emery; Vicki J Volbrecht; David H Peterzell; Michael A Webster
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Compensation for red-green contrast loss in anomalous trichromats.

Authors:  A E Boehm; D I A MacLeod; J M Bosten
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Filling in, filling out, or filtering out: processes stabilizing color appearance near the center of gaze.

Authors:  Sean F O'Neil; Michael A Webster
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 2.129

6.  The Verriest Lecture: Adventures in blue and yellow.

Authors:  Michael A Webster
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 2.129

7.  Color categories and color appearance.

Authors:  Michael A Webster; Paul Kay
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2011-12-15

8.  Variations in normal color vision. VI. Factors underlying individual differences in hue scaling and their implications for models of color appearance.

Authors:  Kara J Emery; Vicki J Volbrecht; David H Peterzell; Michael A Webster
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Perceiving the average hue of color arrays.

Authors:  Jacquelyn Webster; Paul Kay; Michael A Webster
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 2.129

10.  Biological origins of color categorization.

Authors:  Alice E Skelton; Gemma Catchpole; Joshua T Abbott; Jenny M Bosten; Anna Franklin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.