Literature DB >> 10820622

Spatial frequency tuned covariance channels for red-green and luminance-modulated gratings: psychophysical data from human adults.

D H Peterzell1, D Y Teller.   

Abstract

Both chromatic and luminance-modulated stimuli are served by multiple spatial-frequency-tuned channels. This experiment investigated the independence versus interdependence of spatial frequency channels that serve the detection of red-green chromatic versus yellow-black luminance-modulated stimuli at low spatial frequencies. Contrast thresholds for both chromatic and luminance-modulated gratings were measured within 12 individual subjects using a repeated-measures design. Spatial frequencies ranged from 0.27 to 2.16 c/deg. A covariance structure analysis of individual differences was applied to the data. We computed statistical sources of individual variability, used them to define covariance channels, and determined the number and frequency tuning of these channels. For luminance-modulated gratings, two covariance channels were found, including one above and one below 1 c/deg [cf. Peterzell, & Teller (1996). Individual differences in contrast sensitivity functions: the coarsest spatial pattern analyzer. Vision Research, 36, 3077-3085]. For chromatic gratings, correlations between thresholds for most spatial frequencies were uniformly high, yielding a single covariance channel covering all but the highest spatial frequency tested. A combined analysis of both data sets recovered the same three covariance channels, and showed that detection thresholds for low-frequency red-green chromatic and luminance-modulated stimuli are served by separate, statistically independent processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10820622     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(99)00187-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  7 in total

1.  Two distinct visual motion mechanisms for smooth pursuit: evidence from individual differences.

Authors:  Jeremy B Wilmer; Ken Nakayama
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-06-21       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  How to use individual differences to isolate functional organization, biology, and utility of visual functions; with illustrative proposals for stereopsis.

Authors:  Jeremy B Wilmer
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  2008

3.  Individual differences in visual science: What can be learned and what is good experimental practice?

Authors:  John D Mollon; Jenny M Bosten; David H Peterzell; Michael A Webster
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Variations in normal color vision. VI. Factors underlying individual differences in hue scaling and their implications for models of color appearance.

Authors:  Kara J Emery; Vicki J Volbrecht; David H Peterzell; Michael A Webster
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Effects of gestational length, gender, postnatal age, and birth order on visual contrast sensitivity in infants.

Authors:  Karen R Dobkins; Rain G Bosworth; Joseph P McCleery
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Characterization of Spatial Frequency Channels Underlying Disparity Sensitivity by Factor Analysis of Population Data.

Authors:  Alexandre Reynaud; Robert F Hess
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 2.380

7.  Individual Variability in Simultaneous Contrast for Color and Brightness: Small Sample Factor Analyses Reveal Separate Induction Processes for Short and Long Flashes.

Authors:  Sae Kaneko; Ikuya Murakami; Ichiro Kuriki; David H Peterzell
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2018-09-23
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.