Literature DB >> 8447109

Individual differences in contrast sensitivity functions: the first four months of life in humans.

D H Peterzell1, J S Werner, P S Kaplan.   

Abstract

Contrast sensitivity functions of forty 4-month-old human infants were measured using a preferential-looking method and the method of constant stimuli. Circular sinewave gratings varied from 0.27 to 1.08 c/deg, contained eight unattenuated cycles (with edges tapered to uniform gray), and rose to the desired contrast in 2 sec. Log contrast sensitivities for variables close in spatial frequency correlated more highly than those that were farther apart in these data, and in data of 1-, 2-, and 3-month-olds from Banks and Salapatek [(1981) Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 31, 1-45]. Factor analyses yielded at least two frequency-tuned factors per age group. Monte Carlo simulations of a quantitative model that shifts spatial mechanisms to higher frequencies with age reproduced the results for 4-month-olds, but simulations of adultlike, unshifting mechanisms did not. The data are consistent with the following conclusions: (a) individual differences in the sensitivity of spatial mechanisms may explain some individual differences in CSFs; (b) factor analysis may help to estimate mechanism tuning; and (c) spatial mechanisms may shift to higher frequencies during development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8447109     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(93)90093-c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  7 in total

1.  A theory of the visual system biology underlying development of spatial frequency lateralization.

Authors:  Mary F Howard; James A Reggia
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2007-03-08       Impact factor: 2.310

2.  How to use individual differences to isolate functional organization, biology, and utility of visual functions; with illustrative proposals for stereopsis.

Authors:  Jeremy B Wilmer
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  2008

3.  Evidence of spatial and temporal channels in the correlational structure of human spatiotemporal contrast sensitivity.

Authors:  V A Billock; T H Harding
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1996-01-15       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Individual differences in visual science: What can be learned and what is good experimental practice?

Authors:  John D Mollon; Jenny M Bosten; David H Peterzell; Michael A Webster
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Age-related changes in visual temporal order judgment performance: Relation to sensory and cognitive capacities.

Authors:  Thomas Busey; James Craig; Chris Clark; Larry Humes
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-05-16       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Variations in normal color vision. VI. Factors underlying individual differences in hue scaling and their implications for models of color appearance.

Authors:  Kara J Emery; Vicki J Volbrecht; David H Peterzell; Michael A Webster
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 7.  Contrast insensitivity: the critical immaturity in infant visual performance.

Authors:  Angela M Brown; Delwin T Lindsey
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.973

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.