Literature DB >> 19009552

High-resolution array genomic hybridization in prenatal diagnosis.

J M Friedman1.   

Abstract

Array genomic hybridization (AGH) can detect chromosomal gains or losses that are 100 times smaller than those identifiable by conventional cytogenetic methods. Genome-wide AGH can identify genomic imbalance that causes birth defects and mental retardation at least twice as frequently as conventional cytogenetic analysis. Using AGH as a prenatal test for fetal genomic imbalance offers the promise of detecting pathogenic gain or loss of genomic material more quickly and much more frequently than current methods. However, the chance of finding a result of uncertain clinical significance is much greater than with conventional cytogenetic analysis, and the benefit-cost ratio of doing AGH in addition to conventional cytogenetic analysis in pregnancies at high risk for Down syndrome is likely to be poor. Very little is known about the natural history and range of clinical variability associated with most pathogenic submicroscopic copy number variants (CNVs). It seems doubtful that patients can be adequately counseled for prenatal AGH testing in most cases because the risks and benefits are unknown. At present, AGH should be offered for prenatal diagnosis only if the pregnancy is at especially high risk of having a pathogenic CNV or if AGH is being done as part of a clinical trial. Copyright (c) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19009552     DOI: 10.1002/pd.2129

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  17 in total

Review 1.  From prenatal genomic diagnosis to fetal personalized medicine: progress and challenges.

Authors:  Diana W Bianchi
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 53.440

2.  Non-invasive prenatal testing: ethical issues explored.

Authors:  Antina de Jong; Wybo J Dondorp; Christine E M de Die-Smulders; Suzanne G M Frints; Guido M W R de Wert
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  Application of SNP array for rapid prenatal diagnosis: implementation, genetic counselling and diagnostic flow.

Authors:  Malgorzata Srebniak; Marjan Boter; Grétel Oudesluijs; Marieke Joosten; Lutgarde Govaerts; Diane Van Opstal; Robert-Jan H Galjaard
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 4.246

4.  Genomic characterization of prenatally detected chromosomal structural abnormalities using oligonucleotide array comparative genomic hybridization.

Authors:  Peining Li; Pawel Pomianowski; Miriam S DiMaio; Joanne R Florio; Michael R Rossi; Bixia Xiang; Fang Xu; Hui Yang; Qian Geng; Jiansheng Xie; Maurice J Mahoney
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 2.802

5.  Integration of microarray technology into prenatal diagnosis: counselling issues generated during the NICHD clinical trial.

Authors:  Ronald J Wapner; Deborah A Driscoll; Joe Leigh Simpson
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.050

6.  Comparison of genome-wide array genomic hybridization platforms for the detection of copy number variants in idiopathic mental retardation.

Authors:  Tracy Tucker; Alexandre Montpetit; David Chai; Susanna Chan; Sébastien Chénier; Bradley P Coe; Allen Delaney; Patrice Eydoux; Wan L Lam; Sylvie Langlois; Emmanuelle Lemyre; Marco Marra; Hong Qian; Guy A Rouleau; David Vincent; Jacques L Michaud; Jan M Friedman
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2011-03-25       Impact factor: 3.063

Review 7.  Recent advances in the prenatal interrogation of the human fetal genome.

Authors:  Lisa Hui; Diana W Bianchi
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 11.639

8.  Chromosomal microarray analysis as a first-line test in pregnancies with a priori low risk for the detection of submicroscopic chromosomal abnormalities.

Authors:  Francesco Fiorentino; Stefania Napoletano; Fiorina Caiazzo; Mariateresa Sessa; Sara Bono; Letizia Spizzichino; Anthony Gordon; Andrea Nuccitelli; Giuseppe Rizzo; Marina Baldi
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 4.246

9.  22q11.2 deletions in patients with conotruncal defects: data from 1,610 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Shabnam Peyvandi; Philip J Lupo; Jennifer Garbarini; Stacy Woyciechowski; Sharon Edman; Beverly S Emanuel; Laura E Mitchell; Elizabeth Goldmuntz
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2013-04-21       Impact factor: 1.655

10.  Detection of pathogenic copy number variants in children with idiopathic intellectual disability using 500 K SNP array genomic hybridization.

Authors:  Jm Friedman; Shelin Adam; Laura Arbour; Linlea Armstrong; Agnes Baross; Patricia Birch; Cornelius Boerkoel; Susanna Chan; David Chai; Allen D Delaney; Stephane Flibotte; William T Gibson; Sylvie Langlois; Emmanuelle Lemyre; H Irene Li; Patrick MacLeod; Joan Mathers; Jacques L Michaud; Barbara C McGillivray; Millan S Patel; Hong Qian; Guy A Rouleau; Margot I Van Allen; Siu-Li Yong; Farah R Zahir; Patrice Eydoux; Marco A Marra
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2009-11-16       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.