Literature DB >> 19005252

Word recognition following implantation of conventional and 10-mm hybrid electrodes.

Michael F Dorman1, Rene Gifford, Kristen Lewis, Sharon McKarns, Jennifer Ratigan, Anthony Spahr, Jon K Shallop, Colin L W Driscoll, Charles Luetje, Bradley S Thedinger, Charles W Beatty, Mark Syms, Mike Novak, David Barrs, Lisa Cowdrey, Jennifer Black, Louise Loiselle.   

Abstract

We compared the effectiveness of 2 surgical interventions for improving word recognition ability in a quiet environment among patients who presented with: (1) bilateral, precipitously sloping, high-frequency hearing loss; (2) relatively good auditory thresholds at and below 500 Hz, and (3) poor speech recognition. In 1 intervention (n = 25), a conventional electrode array was inserted into 1 cochlea. As a consequence, hearing was lost in the implanted ear. In the other intervention (n = 22), a Nucleus Hybrid short-electrode array was inserted 10 mm into 1 cochlea with the aim of preserving hearing in that ear. Both groups of patients had similar low-frequency hearing and speech understanding in the ear contralateral to the implant. Following surgery, both groups had significantly higher word recognition scores than before surgery. Between-group comparisons indicated that the conventional electrode array group had higher word recognition scores than the 10-mm group when stimulation was presented to the operated ear and when stimulation was presented to both ears. Copyright 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19005252      PMCID: PMC2740743          DOI: 10.1159/000171480

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Audiol Neurootol        ISSN: 1420-3030            Impact factor:   1.854


  20 in total

1.  Combined electric and acoustic stimulation of the auditory system: results of a clinical study.

Authors:  Jan Kiefer; Marcel Pok; Oliver Adunka; Ekkehard Stürzebecher; Wolfgang Baumgartner; Marcus Schmidt; Jochen Tillein; Qing Ye; Wolfgang Gstoettner
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2005-02-17       Impact factor: 1.854

2.  Preservation of hearing in cochlear implant surgery: advantages of combined electrical and acoustical speech processing.

Authors:  Bruce J Gantz; Christopher Turner; Kate E Gfeller; Mary W Lowder
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Speech and melody recognition in binaurally combined acoustic and electric hearing.

Authors:  Ying-Yee Kong; Ginger S Stickney; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Speech perception for adults who use hearing aids in conjunction with cochlear implants in opposite ears.

Authors:  Mansze Mok; David Grayden; Richard C Dowell; David Lawrence
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Combined electric and contralateral acoustic hearing: word and sentence recognition with bimodal hearing.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Michael F Dorman; Sharon A McKarns; Anthony J Spahr
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Speech perception in noise with implant and hearing aid.

Authors:  M Armstrong; P Pegg; C James; P Blamey
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1997-11

Review 7.  What's wrong with Bonferroni adjustments.

Authors:  T V Perneger
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-04-18

8.  Ipsilateral electric acoustic stimulation of the auditory system: results of long-term hearing preservation.

Authors:  Wolfgang K Gstoettner; Silke Helbig; Nicola Maier; Jan Kiefer; Andreas Radeloff; Oliver F Adunka
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2006-10-06       Impact factor: 1.854

9.  Benefit of wearing a hearing aid on the unimplanted ear in adult users of a cochlear implant.

Authors:  Camille C Dunn; Richard S Tyler; Shelley A Witt
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Hybrid cochlear implantation: clinical results and critical review in 13 cases.

Authors:  Charles M Luetje; Bradley S Thedinger; Lisa R Buckler; Kristin L Dawson; Kristin L Lisbona
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.311

View more
  11 in total

1.  The Effect of Residual Acoustic Hearing and Adaptation to Uncertainty on Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users: Evidence From Eye-Tracking.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Ashley Farris-Trimble; Michael Seedorff; Hannah Rigler
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Combining acoustic and electric stimulation in the service of speech recognition.

Authors:  Michael F Dorman; Rene H Gifford
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 2.117

3.  How Do You Deal With Uncertainty? Cochlear Implant Users Differ in the Dynamics of Lexical Processing of Noncanonical Inputs.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Tyler P Ellis; Keith S Apfelbaum
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Effects of lower frequency-to-electrode allocations on speech and pitch perception with the hybrid short-electrode cochlear implant.

Authors:  Lina A J Reiss; Ann E Perreau; Christopher W Turner
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 1.854

5.  Speech masking release in Hybrid cochlear implant users: Roles of spectral and temporal cues in electric-acoustic hearing.

Authors:  Viral D Tejani; Carolyn J Brown
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  A Within-Subject Comparison of Bimodal Hearing, Bilateral Cochlear Implantation, and Bilateral Cochlear Implantation With Bilateral Hearing Preservation: High-Performing Patients.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Colin L W Driscoll; Timothy J Davis; Pam Fiebig; Alan Micco; Michael F Dorman
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 7.  Psychophysical properties of low-frequency hearing: implications for perceiving speech and music via electric and acoustic stimulation.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Michael F Dorman; Christopher A Brown
Journal:  Adv Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-11-25

8.  Two ears and two (or more?) devices: a pediatric case study of bilateral profound hearing loss.

Authors:  Rosalie M Uchanski; Lisa S Davidson; Sharon Quadrizius; Ruth Reeder; Jamie Cadieux; Jerrica Kettel; Richard A Chole
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2009-06

9.  Cochlear implantation with hearing preservation yields significant benefit for speech recognition in complex listening environments.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Michael F Dorman; Henryk Skarzynski; Artur Lorens; Marek Polak; Colin L W Driscoll; Peter Roland; Craig A Buchman
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  THE PSYCHOPHYSICS OF LOW-FREQUENCY ACOUSTIC HEARING IN ELECTRIC AND ACOUSTIC STIMULATION (EAS) AND BIMODAL PATIENTS.

Authors:  Rene H Gifford; Michael F Dorman
Journal:  J Hear Sci       Date:  2012-05-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.