Literature DB >> 19001570

The turple effect is modulated by base word frequency: implications for models of lexical and semantic access.

Claudio Mulatti1, Veronica Cembrani, Francesca Peressotti, Remo Job.   

Abstract

People who are asked to classify whether words presented visually belong to the category of animals respond to nonwords derived from animal names more slowly than they do to nonwords derived from nonanimal names. This is known as the turple effect (Forster, 2006; Forster & Hector, 2002). In the present article, we show that the turple effect is modulated by the frequency of the animal names from which the nonwords are derived: In particular, we show that nonwords derived from high-frequency animal names are rejected faster than those derived from low-frequency animal names. We discuss the implications of this result for two approaches to lexical and semantic access modeling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19001570     DOI: 10.3758/PBR.15.6.1078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  8 in total

Review 1.  DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud.

Authors:  M Coltheart; K Rastle; C Perry; R Langdon; J Ziegler
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Cascaded versus noncascaded models of lexical and semantic processing: the turple effect.

Authors:  Kenneth I Forster; Jo Hector
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-10

3.  Serial mechanisms in lexical access: the rank hypothesis.

Authors:  W S Murray; K I Forster
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Effects of frequency on visual word recognition tasks: where are they?

Authors:  S Monsell; M C Doyle; P N Haggard
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1989-03

5.  Enemies and friends in the neighborhood: orthographic similarity effects in semantic categorization.

Authors:  Diane Pecher; René Zeelenberg; Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Zeading and reazing: which is faster? The position of the diverging letter in a pseudoword determines reading time.

Authors:  Claudio Mulatti; Francesca Peressotti; Remo Job
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.143

7.  Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: a multiple read-out model.

Authors:  J Grainger; A M Jacobs
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Effects of orthographic neighborhood in visual word recognition: cross-task comparisons.

Authors:  M Carreiras; M Perea; J Grainger
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 3.051

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.