Literature DB >> 19000977

Behaviourally mediated crypsis in two nocturnal moths with contrasting appearance.

Richard J Webster1, Alison Callahan, Jean-Guy J Godin, Thomas N Sherratt.   

Abstract

The natural resting orientations of several species of nocturnal moth on tree trunks were recorded over a three-month period in eastern Ontario, Canada. Moths from certain genera exhibited resting orientation distributions that differed significantly from random, whereas others did not. In particular, Catocala spp. collectively tended to orient vertically, whereas subfamily Larentiinae representatives showed a variety of orientations that did not differ significantly from random. To understand why different moth species adopted different orientations, we presented human subjects with a computer-based detection task of finding and 'attacking' Catocala cerogama and Euphyia intermediata target images at different orientations when superimposed on images of sugar maple (Acer saccharum) trees. For both C. cerogama and E. intermediata, orientation had a significant effect on survivorship, although the effect was more pronounced in C. cerogama. When the tree background images were flipped horizontally the optimal orientation changed accordingly, indicating that the detection rates were dependent on the interaction between certain directional appearance features of the moth and its background. Collectively, our results suggest that the contrasting wing patterns of the moths are involved in background matching, and that the moths are able to improve their crypsis through appropriate behavioural orientation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19000977      PMCID: PMC2674076          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0215

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  16 in total

1.  Visual background complexity facilitates the evolution of camouflage.

Authors:  Sami Merilaita
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  Empirical tests of the role of disruptive coloration in reducing detectability.

Authors:  Stewart Fraser; Alison Callahan; Dana Klassen; Thomas N Sherratt
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 3.  Predator perception and the interrelation between different forms of protective coloration.

Authors:  Martin Stevens
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-06-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Avian visual pigments: characteristics, spectral tuning, and evolution.

Authors:  Nathan S Hart; David M Hunt
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.926

5.  Background-matching and disruptive coloration, and the evolution of cryptic coloration.

Authors:  Sami Merilaita; Johan Lind
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Spatial heterogeneity, predator cognition, and the evolution of color polymorphism in virtual prey.

Authors:  Alan B Bond; Alan C Kamil
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-02-15       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Disruptive coloration and background pattern matching.

Authors:  Innes C Cuthill; Martin Stevens; Jenna Sheppard; Tracey Maddocks; C Alejandro Párraga; Tom S Troscianko
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-03-03       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Coincident disruptive coloration.

Authors:  Innes C Cuthill; Aron Székely
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Disruptive contrast in animal camouflage.

Authors:  Martin Stevens; Innes C Cuthill; Amy M M Windsor; Hannah J Walker
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 10.  The effectiveness of disruptive coloration as a concealment strategy.

Authors:  Martin Stevens; Innes C Cuthill; C Alejandro Párraga; Tom Troscianko
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.453

View more
  11 in total

1.  Animal camouflage: current issues and new perspectives.

Authors:  Martin Stevens; Sami Merilaita
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Cuttlefish use visual cues to determine arm postures for camouflage.

Authors:  Alexandra Barbosa; Justine J Allen; Lydia M Mäthger; Roger T Hanlon
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Fine nanostructural variation in the wing pattern of a moth Chiasmia eleonora Cramer (1780).

Authors:  Shaunak Ghosh; Monalisa Mishra
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.826

4.  Camouflage, detection and identification of moving targets.

Authors:  Joanna R Hall; Innes C Cuthill; Roland Baddeley; Adam J Shohet; Nicholas E Scott-Samuel
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Mimicry can drive convergence in structural and light transmission features of transparent wings in Lepidoptera.

Authors:  Doris Gomez; Marianne Elias; Charline Sophie Pinna; Maëlle Vilbert; Stephan Borensztajn; Willy Daney de Marcillac; Florence Piron-Prunier; Aaron Pomerantz; Nipam H Patel; Serge Berthier; Christine Andraud
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 8.140

6.  Camouflage effects of various colour-marking morphs against different microhabitat backgrounds in a polymorphic pygmy grasshopper Tetrix japonica.

Authors:  Kaori Tsurui; Atsushi Honma; Takayoshi Nishida
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-07-06       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Cryptically patterned moths perceive bark structure when choosing body orientations that match wing color pattern to the bark pattern.

Authors:  Chang-Ku Kang; Jong-Yeol Moon; Sang-Im Lee; Piotr G Jablonski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Revision of the genus Heteranassa Smith, 1899 (Lepidoptera, Erebidae, Omopterini).

Authors:  Nicholas Homziak; Heidi Hopkins; Kelly B Miller
Journal:  Zookeys       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 1.546

9.  Eye-spots in Lepidoptera attract attention in humans.

Authors:  Jessica L Yorzinski; Michael L Platt; Geoffrey K Adams
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 2.963

10.  Facing the Heat: Does Desiccation and Thermal Stress Explain Patterns of Orientation in an Intertidal Invertebrate?

Authors:  Clarissa M L Fraser; Frank Seebacher; Justin Lathlean; Ross A Coleman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.