Literature DB >> 18990668

Coincident disruptive coloration.

Innes C Cuthill1, Aron Székely.   

Abstract

Even if an animal matches its surroundings perfectly in colour and texture, any mismatch between the spatial phase of its pattern and that of the background, or shadow created by its three-dimensional relief, is potentially revealing. Nevertheless, for camouflage to be fully broken, the shape must be recognizable. Disruptive coloration acts against object recognition by the use of high-contrast internal colour boundaries to break up shape and form. As well as the general outline, characteristic features such as eyes and limbs must also be concealed; this can be achieved by having the colour patterns on different, but adjacent, body parts aligned to match each other (i.e. in phase). Such 'coincident disruptive coloration' ensures that there is no phase disjunction where body parts meet, and causes different sections of the body to blend perceptually. We tested this theory using field experiments with predation by wild birds on artificial moth-like targets, whose wings and (edible pastry) bodies had colour patterns that were variously coincident or not. We also carried out an experiment with humans searching for analogous targets on a computer screen. Both experiments show that coincident disruptive coloration is an effective mechanism for concealing an otherwise revealing body form.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 18990668      PMCID: PMC2674087          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0266

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  15 in total

Review 1.  The role of eyespots as anti-predator mechanisms, principally demonstrated in the Lepidoptera.

Authors:  Martin Stevens
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2005-11

2.  Disruptive body patterning of cuttlefish (Sepia officinalis) requires visual information regarding edges and contrast of objects in natural substrate backgrounds.

Authors:  Chuan-Chin Chiao; Emma J Kelman; Roger T Hanlon
Journal:  Biol Bull       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.818

3.  Cuttlefish responses to visual orientation of substrates, water flow and a model of motion camouflage.

Authors:  A J Shohet; R J Baddeley; J C Anderson; E J Kelman; D Osorio
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.312

4.  Disruptive coloration provides camouflage independent of background matching.

Authors:  H Martin Schaefer; Nina Stobbe
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 5.  Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists.

Authors:  Shinichi Nakagawa; Innes C Cuthill
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2007-11

6.  Disruptive coloration and background pattern matching.

Authors:  Innes C Cuthill; Martin Stevens; Jenna Sheppard; Tracey Maddocks; C Alejandro Párraga; Tom S Troscianko
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-03-03       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Cuttlefish camouflage: visual perception of size, contrast and number of white squares on artificial checkerboard substrata initiates disruptive coloration.

Authors:  C C Chiao; R T Hanlon
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  Disruptive contrast in animal camouflage.

Authors:  Martin Stevens; Innes C Cuthill; Amy M M Windsor; Hannah J Walker
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Disruptive coloration, crypsis and edge detection in early visual processing.

Authors:  Martin Stevens; Innes C Cuthill
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 10.  The effectiveness of disruptive coloration as a concealment strategy.

Authors:  Martin Stevens; Innes C Cuthill; C Alejandro Párraga; Tom Troscianko
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.453

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Defining disruptive coloration and distinguishing its functions.

Authors:  Martin Stevens; Sami Merilaita
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Animal camouflage: current issues and new perspectives.

Authors:  Martin Stevens; Sami Merilaita
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Disruptive camouflage impairs object recognition.

Authors:  Richard J Webster; Christopher Hassall; Chris M Herdman; Jean-Guy J Godin; Thomas N Sherratt
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 4.  How camouflage works.

Authors:  Sami Merilaita; Nicholas E Scott-Samuel; Innes C Cuthill
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Contrasting stripes are a widespread feature of group living in birds, mammals and fishes.

Authors:  Juan J Negro; Jorge Doña; M Carmen Blázquez; Airam Rodríguez; James E Herbert-Read; M de L Brooke
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Adaptive body patterning, three-dimensional skin morphology and camouflage measures of the slender filefish Monacanthus tuckeri on a Caribbean coral reef.

Authors:  Justine J Allen; Derya Akkaynak; Arthur U Sugden; Roger T Hanlon
Journal:  Biol J Linn Soc Lond       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 2.138

7.  Background complexity and the detectability of camouflaged targets by birds and humans.

Authors:  Feng Xiao; Innes C Cuthill
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Behaviourally mediated crypsis in two nocturnal moths with contrasting appearance.

Authors:  Richard J Webster; Alison Callahan; Jean-Guy J Godin; Thomas N Sherratt
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Cryptically patterned moths perceive bark structure when choosing body orientations that match wing color pattern to the bark pattern.

Authors:  Chang-Ku Kang; Jong-Yeol Moon; Sang-Im Lee; Piotr G Jablonski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Defeating crypsis: detection and learning of camouflage strategies.

Authors:  Jolyon Troscianko; Alice E Lown; Anna E Hughes; Martin Stevens
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.