Literature DB >> 19000393

Effectiveness of GP access to magnetic resonance imaging of the knee: a randomised trial.

.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: GPs commonly see patients with knee problems. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the knee is an accurate diagnostic test for meniscus and ligament injuries of the knee, but there is uncertainty about the appropriate use of MRI and when it should enter the diagnostic pathway for patients with these problems. AIM: To assess the effectiveness of GP referral to early MRI and a provisional orthopaedic appointment, compared with referral to an orthopaedic specialist without prior MRI for patients with continuing knee problems. DESIGN OF STUDY: Pragmatic multicentre randomised trial with two parallel groups.
SETTING: A total of 553 patients consulting their GP about a continuing knee problem were recruited from 163 general practices at 11 sites across the UK.
METHOD: Patients were randomised to MRI within 12 weeks of GP referral including a provisional orthopaedic appointment, or orthopaedic appointment without prior MRI within a maximum of 9 months from GP referral. The primary outcome measures were the Short Form 36-item (SF-36) physical functioning scale and the Knee Quality of Life 26-item Questionnaire (KQoL-26) at 6, 12, and 24 months.
RESULTS: Patients randomised to MRI improved mean SF-36 physical functioning scores by 2.81 (95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.26 to 5.89) more than those referred to orthopaedics (P = 0.072). Patients randomised to MRI improved mean KQoL-26 physical functioning scores by 3.65 (95% CI = 1.03 to 6.28) more than controls (P = 0.007). There were no other significant differences.
CONCLUSION: GP access to MRI yielded small, but statistically significant, benefits in patients' knee-related quality of life but non-significant improvements in physical functioning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19000393      PMCID: PMC2576308          DOI: 10.3399/bjgp08X342651

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  29 in total

1.  EuroQol--a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life.

Authors: 
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 2.980

2.  Accuracy of diagnoses from magnetic resonance imaging of the knee. A multi-center analysis of one thousand and fourteen patients.

Authors:  S P Fischer; J M Fox; W Del Pizzo; M J Friedman; S J Snyder; R D Ferkel
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine. Terrific test or tar baby?

Authors:  R A Deyo
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-07-14       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee: assessment of effectiveness.

Authors:  R Mackenzie; A K Dixon; G S Keene; W Hollingworth; D J Lomas; R N Villar
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 2.350

5.  Direct access magnetic resonance imaging of the knee for GPs. Magnetic resonance imaging should be used selectively.

Authors:  J Southgate; N Thomas
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-03-30

6.  Direct access magnetic resonance imaging of the knee for GPs. Patients should be seen by an experienced orthopaedic surgeon.

Authors:  R Mackenzie; D Edwards; A K Dixon
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-03-30

7.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee: direct access for general practitioners.

Authors:  R Watura; D C Lloyd; S Chawda
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-12-16

Review 8.  Measuring the effects of imaging: an evaluative framework.

Authors:  R Mackenzie; A K Dixon
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 2.350

9.  Direct anatomical-MRI correlation: the knee.

Authors:  R Mackenzie; B M Logan; N J Shah; G S Keene; A K Dixon
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.246

10.  Measuring changes in quality of life following magnetic resonance imaging of the knee: SF-36, EuroQol or Rosser index?

Authors:  W Hollingworth; R Mackenzie; C J Todd; A K Dixon
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 4.147

View more
  13 in total

1.  Direct access to diagnostic services.

Authors:  Bonnie Sibbald
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Aches and pains in primary care: stay positive but critical.

Authors:  Peter Croft
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  A clinical prediction rule for meniscal tears in primary care: development and internal validation using a multicentre study.

Authors:  Barbara Am Snoeker; Aeilko H Zwinderman; Cees Lucas; Robert Lindeboom
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Direct access cancer testing in primary care: a systematic review of use and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Claire Friedemann Smith; Alice C Tompson; Nicholas Jones; Josh Brewin; Elizabeth A Spencer; Clare R Bankhead; Fd Richard Hobbs; Brian D Nicholson
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance imaging of the knee for patients presenting in primary care.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  The effect of waiting times from general practitioner referral to MRI or orthopaedic consultation for the knee on patient-based outcomes.

Authors:  S Brealey; L Andronis; V Dale; A J Gibbon; F J Gilbert; M Hendry; K Hood; D King; C Wilkinson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Participants' preference for type of leaflet used to feed back the results of a randomised trial: a survey.

Authors:  Stephen Brealey; Lazaros Andronis; Laura Dennis; Christine Atwell; Stirling Bryan; Simon Coulton; Helen Cox; Ben Cross; Fiona Fylan; Andrew Garratt; Fiona Gilbert; Maureen Gillan; Maggie Hendry; Kerenza Hood; Helen Houston; David King; Veronica Morton; Michael Robling; Ian Russell; Clare Wilkinson
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 2.279

8.  Unintended consequences: quantifying the benefits, iatrogenic harms and downstream cascade costs of musculoskeletal MRI in UK primary care.

Authors:  Imran Mohammed Sajid; Anand Parkunan; Kathleen Frost
Journal:  BMJ Open Qual       Date:  2021-07

9.  Efficacy of MRI in primary care for patients with knee complaints due to trauma: protocol of a randomised controlled non-inferiority trial (TACKLE trial).

Authors:  Nynke M Swart; Kim K van Oudenaarde; Paul R Algra; Partick J E Bindels; Wilbert B van den Hout; Bart W Koes; Rob G H H Nelissen; Jan A N Verhaar; Hans J L Bloem; Sita M A Bierma-Zeinstra; Monique M Reijnierse; Pim A J Luijsterburg
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Six principles to enhance health workforce flexibility.

Authors:  Susan A Nancarrow
Journal:  Hum Resour Health       Date:  2015-04-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.