Literature DB >> 7550181

Measuring changes in quality of life following magnetic resonance imaging of the knee: SF-36, EuroQol or Rosser index?

W Hollingworth1, R Mackenzie, C J Todd, A K Dixon.   

Abstract

Evidence suggests that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) allows accurate diagnosis of meniscal and ligamentous injuries of the knee. However the link between improved diagnosis through MRI and improved patient quality of life (QOL) has yet to be shown. Previous studies aimed at establishing this link have found no significant improvements in health related quality of life (HRQOL) as measured by the Rosser classification and index. This paper presents the results of three HRQOL questionnaires (SF-36, Rosser and EuroQol) used to measure health change in 332 patients referred for MRI of the knee. Before imaging, patients reported poorer HRQOL than the general population on two of the three questionnaires (SF-36 and EuroQol). The same two questionnaires recorded significant improvements in patient health at six months, although patients' health had not yet reached that experienced in the general population. There was evidence to suggest that the index values attached to the Rosser classification made it unresponsive in this group of patients, which may have predisposed the null results of previous studies of the influence of MRI on HRQOL. Some evidence is provided to suggest that the EurolQol may be less responsive in assessing change in health status than the SF-36.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7550181     DOI: 10.1007/bf01593885

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  25 in total

1.  EuroQol--a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life.

Authors: 
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 2.980

2.  The clinical efficacy of diagnostic imaging evaluation studies. Problems, paradigms, and prescriptions.

Authors:  J E Goin; G A Hermann
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 6.016

3.  Should QALYs be programme-specific?

Authors:  C Donaldson; A Atkinson; J Bond; K Wright
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 3.883

4.  The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.

Authors:  J E Ware; C D Sherbourne
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Assumptions of the QALY procedure.

Authors:  R A Carr-Hill
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging of the knee joint: normal anatomy.

Authors:  M A Reicher; W Rauschning; R H Gold; L W Bassett; R B Lufkin; W Glen
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 7.  Interpretation of quality of life changes.

Authors:  E Lydick; R S Epstein
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging for axillary symptoms following treatment of breast carcinoma? A randomized trial.

Authors:  A K Dixon; T K Wheeler; D J Lomas; R Mackenzie
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 2.350

9.  Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in suspected lesions in the posterior cranial fossa.

Authors:  G M Teasdale; D M Hadley; A Lawrence; I Bone; H Burton; R Grant; B Condon; P Macpherson; J Rowan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-08-05

10.  Cost effectiveness of magnetic resonance imaging in the neurosciences.

Authors:  A K Szczepura; J Fletcher; J D Fitz-Patrick
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-12-07
View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Quality of life and neurological illness: a review of the literature.

Authors:  R Murrell
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 7.444

2.  Responsiveness of the EuroQol in breast cancer patients undergoing high dose chemotherapy.

Authors:  B Conner-Spady; C Cumming; J M Nabholtz; P Jacobs; D Stewart
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 3.  A review of the progress towards developing health-related quality-of-life instruments for international clinical studies and outcomes research.

Authors:  R T Anderson; N K Aaronson; M Bullinger; W L McBee
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Impaired renal function is associated with worse self-reported outcomes after kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Luca Neri; Jonathan Dukes; Daniel C Brennan; Paulo R Salvalaggio; Susmitha Seelam; Srividya Desiraju; Mark Schnitzler
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Variations in population health status: results from a United Kingdom national questionnaire survey.

Authors:  P Kind; P Dolan; C Gudex; A Williams
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-03-07

6.  Health status instruments should satisfy full range of methodological criteria.

Authors:  S Petrou
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-03-14

7.  Health outcomes by self-report: validity of the SF-36 among Australian hospital patients.

Authors:  B Shadbolt; J McCallum; M Singh
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Responsiveness of generic health-related quality of life measures in stroke.

Authors:  A Simon Pickard; Jeffrey A Johnson; David H Feeny
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 9.  Economic and health-related quality of life considerations of new therapies in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  L M Rubenstein; A DeLeo; E A Chrischilles
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.981

10.  Measuring patient benefit from botulinum toxin in the treatment of dystonia. Feasibility of cost-utility analysis.

Authors:  C M Gudex; M R Hawthorne; A G Butler; P O Duffey
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.981

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.