Literature DB >> 7940083

Direct anatomical-MRI correlation: the knee.

R Mackenzie1, B M Logan, N J Shah, G S Keene, A K Dixon.   

Abstract

Cadaveric material is often used to guide and validate the interpretation of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies. Direct correlation is achieved when the cadaver material is imaged and then directly sectioned in the plane of the image. Indirect correlation, where the cadaveric sections are compared with unrelated in-vivo images, is easier and more commonly used. Technical difficulties associated with the direct method include preservation of form and composition of the tissues, and the choice of the correct location and plane in which to section the cadaver. Using an MRI compatible ruler, designed to assist the direct correlation of MRI and cadaveric sections, we have examined 10 preserved (embalmed) cadaveric knees using different MRI sequences on several occasions. Despite these variations, subsequent sectioning of the cadaveric knees has shown good correlation with the MR images. Of 54 MR images compared with cadaveric sections, anatomical correlation was rated by independent observers as good or perfect in 47 (87%). This new, versatile and simple method can make better use of our preserved human cadaveric material and has potentially wide application; we are now developing it further to assess the technical capabilities of novel imaging sequences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7940083     DOI: 10.1007/bf01627593

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat        ISSN: 0930-1038            Impact factor:   1.246


  7 in total

1.  The reliability of radiologists' quality assessment of MR pelvic scans.

Authors:  J G Wright; T R McCauley; S M Bell; S McCarthy
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1992 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.826

2.  Inexpensive technique for performing magnetic resonance-pathologic correlation in cadavers.

Authors:  J Hodler; D Trudell; H S Kang; I Kjellin; D Resnick
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 6.016

3.  Anatomic correlation of cadaver cryomicrotomy with magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  R Lufkin; W Rauschning; L Seeger; L Bassett; W Hanafee
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.246

4.  Technical note: a multi-purpose ruler for magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  R Mackenzie; N J Shah; S Doran; A K Dixon
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Clinical biostatistics. LIV. The biostatistics of concordance.

Authors:  M S Kramer; A R Feinstein
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 6.  Disease, level of impact, and quality of research methods. Three dimensions of clinical efficacy assessment applied to magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  D L Kent; E B Larson
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 6.016

7.  Computerized cranial tomography. Effect on diagnostic and therapeutic plans.

Authors:  H V Fineberg; R Bauman; M Sosman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1977-07-18       Impact factor: 56.272

  7 in total
  6 in total

1.  Measuring changes in quality of life following magnetic resonance imaging of the knee: SF-36, EuroQol or Rosser index?

Authors:  W Hollingworth; R Mackenzie; C J Todd; A K Dixon
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  A direct comparison of MR images and thin-layer plastination of the shoulder in the apprehension-test position.

Authors:  M Thomas; H Steinke; T Schulz
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2003-11-07       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  Effectiveness of GP access to magnetic resonance imaging of the knee: a randomised trial.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  The effect of waiting times from general practitioner referral to MRI or orthopaedic consultation for the knee on patient-based outcomes.

Authors:  S Brealey; L Andronis; V Dale; A J Gibbon; F J Gilbert; M Hendry; K Hood; D King; C Wilkinson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  The DAMASK trial protocol: a pragmatic randomised trial to evaluate whether GPs should have direct access to MRI for patients with suspected internal derangement of the knee.

Authors:  Stephen D Brealey; Christine Atwell; Stirling Bryan; Simon Coulton; Helen Cox; Ben Cross; Fiona Fylan; Andrew Garratt; Fiona J Gilbert; Maureen G C Gillan; Maggie Hendry; Kerenza Hood; Helen Houston; David King; Veronica Morton; Jo Orchard; Michael Robling; Ian T Russell; David Torgerson; Valerie Wadsworth; Clare Wilkinson
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-10-13       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Influence of magnetic resonance of the knee on GPs' decisions: a randomised trial.

Authors:  Stephen D Brealey
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.386

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.