Literature DB >> 26212848

A clinical prediction rule for meniscal tears in primary care: development and internal validation using a multicentre study.

Barbara Am Snoeker1, Aeilko H Zwinderman1, Cees Lucas1, Robert Lindeboom1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In primary care, meniscal tears are difficult to detect. A quick and easy clinical prediction rule based on patient history and a single meniscal test may help physicians to identify high-risk patients for referral for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). AIM: The study objective was to develop and internally validate a clinical prediction rule (CPR) for the detection of meniscal tears in primary care. DESIGN AND
SETTING: In a cross-sectional multicentre study, 121 participants from primary care were included if they were aged 18-65 years with knee complaints that existed for <6 months, and who were suspected to suffer from a meniscal tear.
METHOD: One diagnostic physical meniscal test and 14 clinical variables were considered to be predictors of MRI outcome. Using known predictors for the presence of meniscal tears, a 'quick and easy' CPR was derived.
RESULTS: The final CPR included the variables sex, age, weight-bearing during trauma, performing sports, effusion, warmth, discolouration, and Deep Squat test. The final model had an AUC of 0.76 (95% CI = 0.72 to 0.80). A cut-point of 150 points yielded an overall sensitivity of 86.1% and a specificity of 45.5%. For this cut-point, the positive predictive value was 55.0%, and the negative predictive value was 81.1%. A scoring system was provided including the corresponding predicted probabilities for a meniscal tear.
CONCLUSION: The CPR improved the detection of meniscal tears in primary care. Further evaluation of the CPR in new primary care patients is needed, however, to assess its usefulness. © British Journal of General Practice 2015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical prediction rule; diagnosis; knee; primary health care

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26212848      PMCID: PMC4513740          DOI: 10.3399/bjgp15X686089

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  16 in total

1.  The accuracy of physical diagnostic tests for assessing meniscal lesions of the knee: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  R J Scholten; W L Devillé; W Opstelten; D Bijl; C G van der Plas; L M Bouter
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 0.493

2.  Penalized maximum likelihood estimation to directly adjust diagnostic and prognostic prediction models for overoptimism: a clinical example.

Authors:  K G M Moons; A Rogier T Donders; E W Steyerberg; F E Harrell
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 3.  The diagnosis of meniscus tears: the role of MRI and clinical examination.

Authors:  Mark Ryzewicz; Bret Peterson; Patrick N Siparsky; Reed L Bartz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  Magnetic resonance imaging versus arthroscopy in the diagnosis of knee pathology, concentrating on meniscal lesions and ACL tears: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ruth Crawford; Gayle Walley; Stephen Bridgman; Nicola Maffulli
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  2007-09-03       Impact factor: 4.291

5.  Compression or distraction of the anterior cruciate injured knee. Variations in injury pattern in contact sports and downhill skiing.

Authors:  T Fridén; T Erlandsson; R Zätterström; A Lindstrand; U Moritz
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Sports injury, occupational physical activity, joint laxity, and meniscal damage.

Authors:  Paul Baker; David Coggon; Isabel Reading; David Barrett; Magnus McLaren; Cyrus Cooper
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.666

Review 7.  Risk factors for meniscal tears: a systematic review including meta-analysis.

Authors:  Barbara A M Snoeker; Eric W P Bakker; Cornelia A T Kegel; Cees Lucas
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2013-04-29       Impact factor: 4.751

Review 8.  Meniscus pathology, osteoarthritis and the treatment controversy.

Authors:  Martin Englund; Frank W Roemer; Daichi Hayashi; Michel D Crema; Ali Guermazi
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 20.543

9.  A clinical composite score accurately detects meniscal pathology.

Authors:  Douglas J Lowery; Timothy D Farley; David W Wing; William I Sterett; J Richard Steadman
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.772

10.  Evaluating acutely injured patients for internal derangement of the knee.

Authors:  Michael Grover
Journal:  Am Fam Physician       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 3.292

View more
  2 in total

1.  Severity of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome and Diagnostic Accuracy of Hand and Body Anthropometric Measures.

Authors:  Mauro Mondelli; Andrea Farioli; Stefano Mattioli; Alessandro Aretini; Federica Ginanneschi; Giuseppe Greco; Stefania Curti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Anamnestic prediction of bucket handle compared to other tear patterns of the medial meniscus in stable knees.

Authors:  Barak Haviv; Shlomo Bronak; Yona Kosashvili; Rafael Thein
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 1.511

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.