Literature DB >> 18998798

Optimizing feature representation for automated systematic review work prioritization.

Aaron M Cohen1.   

Abstract

Automated document classification can be a valuable tool for enhancing the efficiency of creating and updating systematic reviews (SRs) for evidence-based medicine. One way document classification can help is in performing work prioritization: given a set of documents, order them such that the most likely useful documents appear first. We evaluated several alternate classification feature systems including unigram, n-gram, MeSH, and natural language processing (NLP) feature sets for their usefulness on 15 SR tasks, using the area under the receiver operating curve as a measure of goodness. We also examined the impact of topic-specific training data compared to general SR inclusion data. The best feature set used a combination of n-gram and MeSH features. NLP-based features were not found to improve performance. Furthermore, topic-specific training data usually provides a significant performance gain over more general SR training.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18998798      PMCID: PMC2656096     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc        ISSN: 1559-4076


  8 in total

1.  Effective mapping of biomedical text to the UMLS Metathesaurus: the MetaMap program.

Authors:  A R Aronson
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2001

2.  How many Cochrane reviews are needed to cover existing evidence on the effects of health care interventions?

Authors:  Susan Mallett; Mike Clarke
Journal:  ACP J Club       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug

3.  Text categorization models for high-quality article retrieval in internal medicine.

Authors:  Yindalon Aphinyanaphongs; Ioannis Tsamardinos; Alexander Statnikov; Douglas Hardin; Constantin F Aliferis
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2004-11-23       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 4.  A survey of current work in biomedical text mining.

Authors:  Aaron M Cohen; William R Hersh
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 11.622

Review 5.  The use of receiver operating characteristic curves in biomedical informatics.

Authors:  Thomas A Lasko; Jui G Bhagwat; Kelly H Zou; Lucila Ohno-Machado
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2005-04-02       Impact factor: 6.317

6.  Reducing workload in systematic review preparation using automated citation classification.

Authors:  A M Cohen; W R Hersh; K Peterson; Po-Yin Yen
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  The effect of feature representation on MEDLINE document classification.

Authors:  Meliha Yetisgen-Yildiz; Wanda Pratt
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2005

8.  A comparison of citation metrics to machine learning filters for the identification of high quality MEDLINE documents.

Authors:  Yindalon Aphinyanaphongs; Alexander Statnikov; Constantin F Aliferis
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2006-04-18       Impact factor: 4.497

  8 in total
  29 in total

1.  Direct comparison between support vector machine and multinomial naive Bayes algorithms for medical abstract classification.

Authors:  Stan Matwin; Vera Sazonova
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Combining relevance assignment with quality of the evidence to support guideline development.

Authors:  Marcelo Fiszman; Bruce E Bray; Dongwook Shin; Halil Kilicoglu; Glen C Bennett; Olivier Bodenreider; Thomas C Rindflesch
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2010

3.  Performance of support-vector-machine-based classification on 15 systematic review topics evaluated with the WSS@95 measure.

Authors:  Aaron M Cohen
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Cross-topic learning for work prioritization in systematic review creation and update.

Authors:  Aaron M Cohen; Kyle Ambert; Marian McDonagh
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 5.  A Prospective Evaluation of an Automated Classification System to Support Evidence-based Medicine and Systematic Review.

Authors:  Aaron M Cohen; Kyle Ambert; Marian McDonagh
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2010-11-13

6.  A pilot validation study of crowdsourcing systematic reviews: update of a searchable database of pediatric clinical trials of high-dose vitamin D.

Authors:  Nassr Nama; Klevis Iliriani; Meng Yang Xia; Brian P Chen; Linghong Linda Zhou; Supichaya Pojsupap; Coralea Kappel; Katie O'Hearn; Margaret Sampson; Kusum Menon; James Dayre McNally
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2017-01

7.  A new iterative method to reduce workload in systematic review process.

Authors:  Siddhartha Jonnalagadda; Diana Petitti
Journal:  Int J Comput Biol Drug Des       Date:  2013-02-21

8.  A new algorithm for reducing the workload of experts in performing systematic reviews.

Authors:  Stan Matwin; Alexandre Kouznetsov; Diana Inkpen; Oana Frunza; Peter O'Blenis
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.497

9.  Examining the Distribution, Modularity, and Community Structure in Article Networks for Systematic Reviews.

Authors:  Xiaonan Ji; Raghu Machiraju; Alan Ritter; Po-Yin Yen
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2015-11-05

10.  MMiDaS-AE: Multi-modal Missing Data aware Stacked Autoencoder for Biomedical Abstract Screening.

Authors:  Eric W Lee; Byron C Wallace; Karla I Galaviz; Joyce C Ho
Journal:  Proc ACM Conf Health Inference Learn (2020)       Date:  2020-04-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.