Literature DB >> 16901833

Disruptive coloration, crypsis and edge detection in early visual processing.

Martin Stevens1, Innes C Cuthill.   

Abstract

Many animals use concealing markings to reduce the risk of predation. These include background pattern matching (crypsis), where the coloration matches a random sample of the background and disruptive patterns, whose effectiveness has been hypothesized to lie in breaking up the body into a series of apparently unrelated objects. We have previously established the effectiveness of disruptive coloration against avian predators, using artificial moth-like stimuli with colours designed to match natural backgrounds as perceived by birds. Here, we investigate the mechanism by which disruptive patterns reduce detectability, using a computational vision model of edge detection applied to photographs of our experimental stimuli, calibrated for bird colour vision. We show that, disruptive coloration is effective by exploiting edge detection algorithms that we use to model early visual processing. Thus, 'false' edges are detected within the body rather than at its periphery, so inhibiting successful detection of the animal's body outline.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16901833      PMCID: PMC1635512          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2006.3556

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  20 in total

1.  Adaptive filtering in spatial vision: evidence from feature marking in plaids.

Authors:  M A Georgeson; T S Meese
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.490

Review 2.  The visual ecology of avian photoreceptors.

Authors:  N S Hart
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 21.198

3.  Spatiochromatic properties of natural images and human vision.

Authors:  C A Párraga; T Troscianko; D J Tolhurst
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2002-03-19       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Discrimination of oriented visual textures by poultry chicks.

Authors:  C D Jones; D Osorio
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Psychophysical receptive fields of edge detection mechanisms.

Authors:  James H Elder; Adam J Sachs
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 6.  Photoreceptor spectral sensitivities in terrestrial animals: adaptations for luminance and colour vision.

Authors:  D Osorio; M Vorobyev
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Background-matching and disruptive coloration, and the evolution of cryptic coloration.

Authors:  Sami Merilaita; Johan Lind
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Disruptive coloration and background pattern matching.

Authors:  Innes C Cuthill; Martin Stevens; Jenna Sheppard; Tracey Maddocks; C Alejandro Párraga; Tom S Troscianko
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-03-03       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Colour vision of domestic chicks.

Authors:  D Osorio; M Vorobyev; C D Jones
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Ultraviolet colour perception in European starlings and Japanese quail.

Authors:  Emma L Smith; Verity J Greenwood; Andrew T D Bennett
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  64 in total

1.  Visual modeling shows that avian host parents use multiple visual cues in rejecting parasitic eggs.

Authors:  Claire N Spottiswoode; Martin Stevens
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-04-26       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Retinal synaptic pathways underlying the response of the rabbit local edge detector.

Authors:  Thomas L Russell; Frank S Werblin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Why the leopard got its spots: relating pattern development to ecology in felids.

Authors:  William L Allen; Innes C Cuthill; Nicholas E Scott-Samuel; Roland Baddeley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Disruptive and cryptic coloration.

Authors:  John A Endler
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Perception of visual texture and the expression of disruptive camouflage by the cuttlefish, Sepia officinalis.

Authors:  E J Kelman; R J Baddeley; A J Shohet; D Osorio
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-06-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  TDCS guided using fMRI significantly accelerates learning to identify concealed objects.

Authors:  Vincent P Clark; Brian A Coffman; Andy R Mayer; Michael P Weisend; Terran D R Lane; Vince D Calhoun; Elaine M Raybourn; Christopher M Garcia; Eric M Wassermann
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-11-19       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Empirical tests of the role of disruptive coloration in reducing detectability.

Authors:  Stewart Fraser; Alison Callahan; Dana Klassen; Thomas N Sherratt
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Perception of edges and visual texture in the camouflage of the common cuttlefish, Sepia officinalis.

Authors:  S Zylinski; D Osorio; A J Shohet
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Background complexity and the detectability of camouflaged targets by birds and humans.

Authors:  Feng Xiao; Innes C Cuthill
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Pattern mimicry of host eggs by the common cuckoo, as seen through a bird's eye.

Authors:  Mary Caswell Stoddard; Martin Stevens
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.