Literature DB >> 18768703

Intraoperative biomechanical evaluation of anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a navigation system: comparison of hamstring tendon and bone-patellar tendon-bone graft.

Yasuyuki Ishibashi1, Eiichi Tsuda, Akira Fukuda, Harehiko Tsukada, Satoshi Toh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recently, more anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions have been developed to improve knee laxity.
PURPOSE: The objective of this study is to assess knee kinematics after double-bundle reconstruction with hamstring tendon and after anatomically oriented reconstruction with a patellar tendon using navigation during surgery. STUDY
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.
METHODS: Eighty knees received double-bundle reconstruction with a hamstring tendon graft, and 45 knees received anatomically oriented reconstruction with a patellar tendon graft. Before reconstruction, knee laxity was measured using a navigation system. After the posterolateral bundle or anteromedial bundle was temporarily fixed during double-bundle reconstruction, knee laxity was measured to assess the function of each bundle. After double-bundle reconstruction or anatomically oriented reconstruction with patellar tendon, knee laxity was measured in the same manner.
RESULTS: Both double-bundle reconstruction and anatomically oriented reconstruction similarly improved knee laxity compared with before reconstruction in all knee flexion angles. Regarding the function of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles in double-bundle reconstruction, the 2 grafts showed contrasting behavior. The posterolateral bundle restrained tibial displacement mainly in knee extension, whereas the anteromedial bundle restrained it more in the knee flexion position. The posterolateral bundle has a more important role in controlling rotation of the tibia than the anteromedial bundle.
CONCLUSION: Although the posterolateral bundle has an important role in the extension position, the anteromedial bundle is more important in the flexion position. Therefore, both bundles should be reconstructed to improve knee laxity throughout knee range of motion. Even with single-bundle reconstruction using a patellar tendon, anatomic reconstruction might improve knee laxity similar to double-bundle reconstruction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18768703     DOI: 10.1177/0363546508323245

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  16 in total

1.  Comparable results between lateralized single- and double-bundle ACL reconstructions.

Authors:  Eiichi Tsuda; Yasuyuki Ishibashi; Akira Fukuda; Harehiko Tsukada; Satoshi Toh
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Biomechanical techniques to evaluate tibial rotation. A systematic review.

Authors:  Mak-Ham Lam; Daniel Tik-Pui Fong; Patrick Shu-Hang Yung; Kai-Ming Chan
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Navigated knee kinematics after cutting of the ACL and its secondary restraint.

Authors:  E Monaco; A Ferretti; L Labianca; B Maestri; A Speranza; M J Kelly; C D'Arrigo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Effect of fixation angle and graft tension in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on knee biomechanics.

Authors:  Yusuke Sasaki; Shih-Sheng Chang; Masataka Fujii; Daisuke Araki; Junjun Zhu; Brandon Marshall; Monica Linde-Rosen; Patrick Smolinski; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  The relationship of anterior and rotatory laxity between surgical navigation and clinical outcome after ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Shingo Ohkawa; Nobuo Adachi; Masataka Deie; Atsuo Nakamae; Tomoyuki Nakasa; Mitsuo Ochi
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 6.  A systematic review of single- versus double-bundle ACL reconstruction using the anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction scoring checklist.

Authors:  Neel Desai; Eduard Alentorn-Geli; Carola F van Eck; Volker Musahl; Freddie H Fu; Jón Karlsson; Kristian Samuelsson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-10-26       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  The role of the anterolateral ligament in knee's biomechanics: a case-control retrospective study.

Authors:  Alberto Castelli; Giacomo Zanon; Eugenio Jannelli; Alessandro Ivone; Enrico Ferranti Calderoni; Alberto Combi; Mario Mosconi; Francesco Benazzo
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-12-23

Review 8.  In vitro and intraoperative laxities after single-bundle and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions.

Authors:  Hemanth R Gadikota; Jong Keun Seon; Chih-Hui Chen; Jia-Lin Wu; Thomas J Gill; Guoan Li
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.772

9.  Intraoperative laxity measurements using a navigation system in anatomical double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Yuka Kimura; Eiichi Tsuda; Yasuharu Hiraga; Yuji Yamamoto; Shugo Maeda; Yasuyuki Ishibashi
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-11-08       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Anatomic single- versus double-bundle ACL reconstruction: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Neel Desai; Haukur Björnsson; Volker Musahl; Mohit Bhandari; Max Petzold; Freddie H Fu; Kristian Samuelsson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.