Literature DB >> 20668835

Single-bundle patellar tendon versus non-anatomical double-bundle hamstrings ACL reconstruction: a prospective randomized study at 8-year minimum follow-up.

Stefano Zaffagnini1, Danilo Bruni, Giulio Maria Marcheggiani Muccioli, Tommaso Bonanzinga, Nicola Lopomo, Simone Bignozzi, Maurilio Marcacci.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare subjective, objective and radiographic outcome of the lateralized single-bundle bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft with a non-anatomical double-bundle hamstring tendons autograft anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction technique at long-term follow-up.
METHODS: Seventy-nine non-consecutive randomized patients (42 men; 37 women) with unilateral ACL insufficiency were prospectively evaluated, before and after ACL reconstruction by means of the above-mentioned techniques, with a minimum follow-up of 8 years (range 8-10 years; mean 8.6 years). In the double-bundle hamstrings technique, we used one tibial and one femoral tunnel combined with one "over-the-top" passage, cortical staple's fixation and we left intact hamstrings' tibial insertion. Patients were evaluated subjectively and objectively, using IKDC score, Tegner level, manual maximum displacement test with KT-2000™ arthrometer. Radiographic evaluation was performed according to IKDC grading system, and re-intervention rate for meniscal lesions was also recorded.
RESULTS: The subjective and objective IKDC were similar in both groups while double-bundle hamstrings group showed significantly higher Tegner level (P = 0.0007), higher passive range of motion recovery (P = 0.0014), faster sport resumption (P = 0.0052), lower glide pivot-shift phenomenon (P = 0.0302) and lower re-intervention rate (P = 0.0116) compared with patellar tendon group. Radiographic evaluation showed significant lower objective degenerative changes in double-bundle hamstrings group at final follow-up (P = 0.0056).
CONCLUSION: Although both techniques provide satisfactory results, double-bundle ACL reconstruction shows better functional results, with a faster return to sport activity, a lower re-operation rate and lower degenerative knee changes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20668835     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-010-1225-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  37 in total

1.  [MR imaging in the follow-up of ACL reconstruction: retrospective analysis of 54 patients].

Authors:  F Ginolfi; M L Mecca; G Gatta; G Rea; M Di Girolamo
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Relationships between objective assessment of ligament stability and subjective assessment of symptoms and function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Mininder S Kocher; J Richard Steadman; Karen K Briggs; William I Sterett; Richard J Hawkins
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2004 Apr-May       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  Knee stability and graft function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of a lateral and an anatomical femoral tunnel placement.

Authors:  Yuji Yamamoto; Wei-Hsiu Hsu; Savio L-Y Woo; Andrew H Van Scyoc; Yoshiyuki Takakura; Richard E Debski
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  Double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective, randomize clinical study.

Authors:  Timo Järvelä
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Intraoperative evaluation of anteroposterior and rotational stabilities in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: lower femoral tunnel placed single-bundle versus double-bundle reconstruction.

Authors:  Atsushi Kanaya; Mitsuo Ochi; Masataka Deie; Nobuo Adachi; Makoto Nishimori; Atsuo Nakamae
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Comparable results between lateralized single- and double-bundle ACL reconstructions.

Authors:  Eiichi Tsuda; Yasuyuki Ishibashi; Akira Fukuda; Harehiko Tsukada; Satoshi Toh
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Outcome of single-bundle versus double-bundle reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Richard B Meredick; Kennan J Vance; David Appleby; James H Lubowitz
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  Development and evaluation of an activity rating scale for disorders of the knee.

Authors:  R G Marx; T J Stump; E C Jones; T L Wickiewicz; R F Warren
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Accuracy of 3 diagnostic tests for anterior cruciate ligament tears.

Authors:  John A Ostrowski
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2006 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.860

10.  Double-bundle ACL reconstruction: influence of femoral tunnel orientation in knee laxity analysed with a navigation system - an in-vitro biomechanical study.

Authors:  Stefano Zaffagnini; Danilo Bruni; Sandra Martelli; Naoaki Imakiire; Maurilio Marcacci; Alessandro Russo
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2008-02-25       Impact factor: 2.362

View more
  52 in total

Review 1.  Pivot shift as an outcome measure for ACL reconstruction: a systematic review.

Authors:  Olufemi R Ayeni; Manraj Chahal; Michael N Tran; Sheila Sprague
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Factors affecting anterior knee pain following anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Yasuo Niki; Akihiro Hakozaki; Wataru Iwamoto; Hiroya Kanagawa; Hideo Matsumoto; Yoshiaki Toyama; Yasunori Suda
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-11-05       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  Can the pivot-shift be eliminated by anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction?

Authors:  Stefano Zaffagnini; Giulio Maria Marcheggiani Muccioli; Nicola Lopomo; Cecilia Signorelli; Tommaso Bonanzinga; Costanza Musiani; Papakonstantinou Vassilis; Marco Nitri; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Long-term follow-up of patellar tendon grafts or hamstring tendon grafts in endoscopic ACL reconstructions.

Authors:  Tone Gifstad; Anita Sole; Torbjørn Strand; Gisle Uppheim; Torbjørn Grøntvedt; Jon Olav Drogset
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  Double-bundle reconstruction results in superior clinical outcome than single-bundle reconstruction.

Authors:  Ying Zhu; Ren-Kuan Tang; Peng Zhao; Shi-Sheng Zhu; Yong-Guo Li; Jian-Bo Li
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Prospective randomized comparison of knee stability and joint degeneration for double- and single-bundle ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Ran Sun; Bai-cheng Chen; Fei Wang; Xiao-feng Wang; Jing-qing Chen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Arthroscopic anatomic double bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Our experience with follow-up of 4 years.

Authors:  Vivek Machhindra Morey; Hira Lal Nag; Buddhadev Chowdhury; Chaitanya Dev Pannu; Sanjay Meena; Kiran Kumar; Aravindh Palaniswamy
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2015-07-20

Review 8.  Variables associated with return to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sylvia Czuppon; Brad A Racette; Sandra E Klein; Marcie Harris-Hayes
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 13.800

9.  Effect of Loading on In Vivo Tibiofemoral and Patellofemoral Kinematics of Healthy and ACL-Reconstructed Knees.

Authors:  Jarred M Kaiser; Michael F Vignos; Richard Kijowski; Geoffrey Baer; Darryl G Thelen
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Return to sport after ACL reconstruction: how, when and why? A narrative review of current evidence.

Authors:  Stefano Zaffagnini; Alberto Grassi; Margherita Serra; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2015-06-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.