Literature DB >> 18982360

What do laypersons consider as a good death.

Kai-Kuen Leung1, Wen-Jing Liu, Shao-Yi Cheng, Tai-Yuan Chiu, Ching-Yu Chen.   

Abstract

GOALS: This study was designed to understand laypersons' attitude of good death.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 53-item Good-Death Questionnaire (GDQ) was generated by applying "good-death principles" and past research on good death in Chinese people. MAIN
RESULTS: A total of 184 adults completed the questionnaire. The Cronbach's alpha for the GDQ was 0.96. Factor analysis produced five factors: autonomy and choice, wish fulfillment, death preparation, spiritual support and afterlife, and symptom control. Elderly people had higher scores in "autonomy" than people aged < or = 40 (52.71 +/- 5.94 vs. 56.71 +/- 3.82, P = 0.012). Chaplains had higher scores in "death preparation" than volunteers (76.09 +/- 4.44 vs. 70.46 +/- 6.49, P = 0.011) and higher scores in "spiritual support" than volunteer and farmers-workers-businessmen (32.97 +/- 2.49 vs. 28.08 +/- 5.06 and 29.69 +/- 5.05, P = 0.002). People with Buddhist religious belief had higher scores in "spiritual support" than people without religious belief (31.10 +/- 3.99 vs. 25.73 +/- 3.13; P < 0.001). Religious devotion was positively related to "death preparation" and "spiritual support." People who had witnessed death had lower scores of "autonomy and choice" than the inexperienced (55.41 +/- 4.81 vs. 57.06 +/- 3.85; P = 0.032).
CONCLUSIONS: Our results identified some major characteristics of good-death attitude among laypersons. Religious devotion has a positive impact on the attitude of good death.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18982360     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-008-0530-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  23 in total

1.  A reflection on Cicely Saunders' views on a good death through the philosophy of Charles Taylor.

Authors:  Lisbeth Thoresen
Journal:  Int J Palliat Nurs       Date:  2003-01

Review 2.  Quality of life in palliative care cancer patients: a literature review.

Authors:  Hubert R Jocham; Theo Dassen; Guy Widdershoven; Ruud Halfens
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.036

3.  Appropriate death and the hospice program.

Authors:  A D Weisman
Journal:  Hosp J       Date:  1988

4.  Evaluating the quality of dying and death.

Authors:  D L Patrick; R A Engelberg; J R Curtis
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.612

5.  Factors considered important at the end of life by patients, family, physicians, and other care providers.

Authors:  K E Steinhauser; N A Christakis; E C Clipp; M McNeilly; L McIntyre; J A Tulsky
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-11-15       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  The use of proxy respondents in studies of older adults: lessons, challenges, and opportunities.

Authors:  P J Neumann; S S Araki; E M Gutterman
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 5.562

7.  Domiciliary care: a comparison of the views of terminally ill patients and their family caregivers.

Authors:  J A Spiller; D A Alexander
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.762

8.  Narrative nuances on good and bad deaths: internists' tales from high-technology work places.

Authors:  Mary Jo DelVecchio Good; Nina M Gadmer; Patricia Ruopp; Matthew Lakoma; Amy M Sullivan; Ellen Redinbaugh; Robert M Arnold; Susan D Block
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.634

9.  Good enough death: autonomy and choice in Australian palliative care.

Authors:  Beverley McNamara
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  The institutionalization of the good death.

Authors:  B McNamara; C Waddell; M Colvin
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.634

View more
  2 in total

1.  Impact of palliative care consultative service on disease awareness for patients with terminal cancer.

Authors:  Wen-Chi Chou; Yu-Shin Hung; Chen-Yi Kao; Po-Jung Su; Chia-Hsun Hsieh; Jen-Shi Chen; Chi-Ting Liau; Yung-Chang Lin; Chuang-Chi Liaw; Hung-Ming Wang
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 2.  [Limits of pain treatment: medical and judicial aspects].

Authors:  M Zenz; R Rissing-van Saan
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.107

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.