Literature DB >> 11532585

Evaluating the quality of dying and death.

D L Patrick1, R A Engelberg, J R Curtis.   

Abstract

We propose a model for evaluating the quality of dying and death based on concepts elicited from literature review, qualitative interviews with persons with and without chronic and terminal conditions, and consideration of desirable measurement properties. We define quality of dying and death as the degree to which a person's preferences for dying and the moment of death agree with observations of how the person actually died, as reported by others. Expected level of agreement is modified by circumstances surrounding death that may prevent following patient's prior preferences. Qualitative data analysis yielded six conceptual domains: symptoms and personal care, preparation for death, moment of death, family, treatment preferences, and whole person concerns. These domains encompass 31 aspects that can be rated by patients and others as to their importance prior to death and assessed by significant others or clinicians after death to assess the quality of the dying experience. The proposed model uses personal preferences about the dying experience to inform evaluation of this experience by others after death. This operational definition will guide validation of after-death reports of the quality of dying experience and evaluation of interventions to improve quality of end-of-life care.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11532585     DOI: 10.1016/s0885-3924(01)00333-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage        ISSN: 0885-3924            Impact factor:   3.612


  66 in total

1.  Identifying elements of ICU care that families report as important but unsatisfactory: decision-making, control, and ICU atmosphere.

Authors:  Tristan R Osborn; J Randall Curtis; Elizabeth L Nielsen; Anthony L Back; Sarah E Shannon; Ruth A Engelberg
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 2.  A systematic review of measures of end-of-life care and its outcomes.

Authors:  Richard A Mularski; Sydney M Dy; Lisa R Shugarman; Anne M Wilkinson; Joanne Lynn; Paul G Shekelle; Sally C Morton; Virginia C Sun; Ronda G Hughes; Lara K Hilton; Margaret Maglione; Shannon L Rhodes; Cony Rolon; Karl A Lorenz
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  In search of a good death.

Authors:  David P Schenck; Lori A Roscoe
Journal:  J Med Humanit       Date:  2009-03

4.  Integrating palliative and critical care: evaluation of a quality-improvement intervention.

Authors:  J Randall Curtis; Patsy D Treece; Elizabeth L Nielsen; Lois Downey; Sarah E Shannon; Theresa Braungardt; Darrell Owens; Kenneth P Steinberg; Ruth A Engelberg
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 21.405

5.  The Quality of Dying and Death Questionnaire (QODD): empirical domains and theoretical perspectives.

Authors:  Lois Downey; J Randall Curtis; William E Lafferty; Jerald R Herting; Ruth A Engelberg
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 3.612

6.  Transitions regarding palliative and end-of-life care in severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or advanced cancer: themes identified by patients, families, and clinicians.

Authors:  Lynn F Reinke; Ruth A Engelberg; Sarah E Shannon; Marjorie D Wenrich; Elizabeth K Vig; Anthony L Back; J Randall Curtis
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.947

7.  CAESAR: a new tool to assess relatives' experience of dying and death in the ICU.

Authors:  Nancy Kentish-Barnes; Valérie Seegers; Stéphane Legriel; Alain Cariou; Samir Jaber; Jean-Yves Lefrant; Bernard Floccard; Anne Renault; Isabelle Vinatier; Armelle Mathonnet; Danielle Reuter; Olivier Guisset; Christophe Cracco; Amélie Seguin; Jacques Durand-Gasselin; Béatrice Éon; Marina Thirion; Jean-Philippe Rigaud; Bénédicte Philippon-Jouve; Laurent Argaud; Renaud Chouquer; Mélanie Adda; Laurent Papazian; Céline Dedrie; Hugues Georges; Eddy Lebas; Nathalie Rolin; Pierre-Edouard Bollaert; Lucien Lecuyer; Gérald Viquesnel; Marc Léone; Ludivine Chalumeau-Lemoine; Zoé Cohen-Solal; Maité Garrouste-Orgeas; Fabienne Tamion; Bruno Falissard; Sylvie Chevret; Elie Azoulay
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  What do laypersons consider as a good death.

Authors:  Kai-Kuen Leung; Wen-Jing Liu; Shao-Yi Cheng; Tai-Yuan Chiu; Ching-Yu Chen
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  What "best practice" could be in Palliative Care: an analysis of statements on practice and ethics expressed by the main Health Organizations.

Authors:  Gaia Barazzetti; Claudia Borreani; Guido Miccinesi; Franco Toscani
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2010-01-07       Impact factor: 3.234

10.  The importance of good death components among cancer patients, the general population, oncologists, and oncology nurses in Japan: patients prefer "fighting against cancer".

Authors:  Mitsunori Miyashita; Sachiko Kawakami; Daiki Kato; Hideomi Yamashita; Hiroshi Igaki; Kimiko Nakano; Yujiro Kuroda; Keiichi Nakagawa
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-07-05       Impact factor: 3.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.