Literature DB >> 21698434

[Limits of pain treatment: medical and judicial aspects].

M Zenz1, R Rissing-van Saan.   

Abstract

Medical principles of pain treatment are generally in line with the judicial principles. To relieve pain is one of the fundamentals of medicine and this has also been acknowledged by the Federal Court in Germany. It is criminal bodily harm, when a physician denies a possible pain treatment. Whereas courts clearly see an obligation to basic and continuing education in pain diagnosis and therapy, pain is still not represented in the German licensing regulations for physicians. Only palliative medicine has been added to the obligatory curriculum. Very similar pain is not mandatory in many clinical disciplines leaving physicians without the needed knowledge to treat pain. The need for interdisciplinary treatment is not yet acknowledged sufficiently, although meanwhile chronic pain is regarded as a bio-psycho-social illness.Since 2009 the advance directive is regulated by law. However, still many physicians are unaware that not only the position of the patient but also of the relatives have been strengthened. In 2010 the Federal Court has pronounced a judgment allowing "passive euthanasia" in certain conditions but prohibiting any active handling even in line with the patient's will. This is also in line with the European Human Rights Convention. The judicial unpunished assisted suicide has provoked an ethical discussion within the medical profession. However, what is not illegal is not automatically accepted as ethical handling for physicians. Palliative medicine is at least one alternative in this discussion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21698434     DOI: 10.1007/s00482-011-1073-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Schmerz        ISSN: 0932-433X            Impact factor:   1.107


  69 in total

1.  Opiophobia and cancer pain in Europe.

Authors:  M Zenz; A Willweber-Strumpf
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-04-24       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Postoperative patient-controlled analgesia with alfentanil: analgesic efficacy and minimum effective concentrations.

Authors:  K A Lehmann; N Ribbert; G Horrichs-Haermeyer
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 3.612

3.  Evaluating the quality of dying and death.

Authors:  D L Patrick; R A Engelberg; J R Curtis
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.612

Review 4.  Quality of life in palliative care: principles and practice.

Authors:  Stein Kaasa; Jon Håvard Loge
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.762

5.  Breaking bad news: starting palliative care.

Authors:  D Doyle; S O'Connell
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 18.000

6.  [Morphine tablets for chronic non-tumor-induced pain. Which factors modify the success or failure of a long-term therapy?].

Authors:  S Schulzeck; M Gleim; C Maier
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 1.041

7.  Expenditures and health status among adults with back and neck problems.

Authors:  Brook I Martin; Richard A Deyo; Sohail K Mirza; Judith A Turner; Bryan A Comstock; William Hollingworth; Sean D Sullivan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-02-13       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 8.  Oral morphine overdose in a cancer patient antagonized by prolonged naloxone infusion.

Authors:  Surjya Upadhyay; Roopesh Jain; Himanshu Chauhan; Deepak Gupta; Seema Mishra; Sushma Bhatnagar
Journal:  Am J Hosp Palliat Care       Date:  2008-06-06       Impact factor: 2.500

Review 9.  The physician's disease: the impact of medical knowledge on personal illness.

Authors:  Jeffrey P Tuttle
Journal:  Palliat Support Care       Date:  2007-03

Review 10.  Long-term opioid management for chronic noncancer pain.

Authors:  Meredith Noble; Jonathan R Treadwell; Stephen J Tregear; Vivian H Coates; Philip J Wiffen; Clarisse Akafomo; Karen M Schoelles
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-01-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.