Literature DB >> 7529433

The institutionalization of the good death.

B McNamara1, C Waddell, M Colvin.   

Abstract

There has been some recent concern in Britain and North America that the increasing institutionalization of hospice care may compromise the movement's founding ideals. The threats posed by the encroachment of mainstream medicine and the medical technological imperative to treat, are also a source of concern to hospice administrators and staff. This study uses Australian data based on interviews with nurses and participant observation in an in-patient hospice unit and a community based hospice service to investigate whether the Good Death ideal, as central to the hospice philosophy, is compatible with the institutionalization of hospice care. The issues that arise, although interrelated are conceptualized as the following five challenges to hospice care: (1) encroachment of mainstream medicine and the medical technical imperative; (2) competing motivations; (3) delimitation of intellectual structures; (4) organizational maintenance; and (5) routinization of the Good Death. This conceptual framework is based on the way in which nurses and other health care professionals have used shared logic and strategies to negotiate the daily demands of their work and illustrates the tension that arises between the maintenance of the ideal and the maintenance of the organization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7529433     DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)90002-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  12 in total

Review 1.  Palliative medicine: is it really specialist territory?

Authors:  S Fordham; C Dowrick; C May
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 2.  What happens when elderly people die?

Authors:  Kalman Kafetz
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 3.  Defining a Good Death (Successful Dying): Literature Review and a Call for Research and Public Dialogue.

Authors:  Emily A Meier; Jarred V Gallegos; Lori P Montross Thomas; Colin A Depp; Scott A Irwin; Dilip V Jeste
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 4.105

4.  Patient autonomy and advance care planning: a qualitative study of oncologist and palliative care physicians' perspectives.

Authors:  Stephanie B Johnson; Phyllis N Butow; Ian Kerridge; Martin H N Tattersall
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Priorities of a "good death" according to cancer patients, their family caregivers, physicians, and the general population: a nationwide survey.

Authors:  Young Ho Yun; Kyoung-Nam Kim; Jin-Ah Sim; EunKyo Kang; Jihye Lee; Jiyeon Choo; Shin Hye Yoo; Miso Kim; Young Ae Kim; Beo Deul Kang; Hyun-Jeong Shim; Eun-Kee Song; Jung Hun Kang; Jung Hye Kwon; Jung Lim Lee; Soon Nam Lee; Chi Hoon Maeng; Eun Joo Kang; Young Rok Do; Yoon Seok Choi; Kyung Hae Jung
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-04-22       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  What do laypersons consider as a good death.

Authors:  Kai-Kuen Leung; Wen-Jing Liu; Shao-Yi Cheng; Tai-Yuan Chiu; Ching-Yu Chen
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  What "best practice" could be in Palliative Care: an analysis of statements on practice and ethics expressed by the main Health Organizations.

Authors:  Gaia Barazzetti; Claudia Borreani; Guido Miccinesi; Franco Toscani
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2010-01-07       Impact factor: 3.234

Review 8.  Common or multiple futures for end of life care around the world? Ideas from the 'waiting room of history'.

Authors:  Shahaduz Zaman; Hamilton Inbadas; Alexander Whitelaw; David Clark
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 4.634

9.  Life at the end of life: beliefs about individual life after death and "good death" models - a qualitative study.

Authors:  Franco Toscani; Claudia Borreani; Paolo Boeri; Guido Miccinesi
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2003-11-07       Impact factor: 3.186

10.  Barriers to and facilitators for implementing quality improvements in palliative care - results from a qualitative interview study in Norway.

Authors:  Ragni Sommerbakk; Dagny Faksvåg Haugen; Aksel Tjora; Stein Kaasa; Marianne Jensen Hjermstad
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 3.234

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.