Literature DB >> 18980948

The contributions of prefrontal cortex and executive control to deception: evidence from activation likelihood estimate meta-analyses.

Shawn E Christ1, David C Van Essen, Jason M Watson, Lindsay E Brubaker, Kathleen B McDermott.   

Abstract

Previous neuroimaging studies have implicated the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and nearby brain regions in deception. This is consistent with the hypothesis that lying involves the executive control system. To date, the nature of the contribution of different aspects of executive control to deception, however, remains unclear. In the present study, we utilized an activation likelihood estimate (ALE) method of meta-analysis to quantitatively identify brain regions that are consistently more active for deceptive responses relative to truthful responses across past studies. We then contrasted the results with additional ALE maps generated for 3 different aspects of executive control: working memory, inhibitory control, and task switching. Deception-related regions in dorsolateral PFC and posterior parietal cortex were selectively associated with working memory. Additional deception regions in ventrolateral PFC, anterior insula, and anterior cingulate cortex were associated with multiple aspects of executive control. In contrast, deception-related regions in bilateral inferior parietal lobule were not associated with any of the 3 executive control constructs. Our findings support the notion that executive control processes, particularly working memory, and their associated neural substrates play an integral role in deception. This work provides a foundation for future research on the neurocognitive basis of deception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18980948      PMCID: PMC2693617          DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhn189

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  49 in total

1.  The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex "Frontal Lobe" tasks: a latent variable analysis.

Authors:  A Miyake; N P Friedman; M J Emerson; A H Witzki; A Howerter; T D Wager
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  The validity of psychophysiological detection of information with the Guilty Knowledge Test: a meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Gershon Ben-Shakhar; Eitan Elaad
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  2003-02

3.  Meta-analysis of the functional neuroanatomy of single-word reading: method and validation.

Authors:  Peter E Turkeltaub; Guinevere F Eden; Karen M Jones; Thomas A Zeffiro
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Neural correlates of different types of deception: an fMRI investigation.

Authors:  G Ganis; S M Kosslyn; S Stose; W L Thompson; D A Yurgelun-Todd
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Neural correlates of telling lies: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study at 4 Tesla.

Authors:  K Luan Phan; Alvaro Magalhaes; Timothy J Ziemlewicz; Daniel A Fitzgerald; Christopher Green; Wilbur Smith
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.173

6.  Detecting deception using functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  F Andrew Kozel; Kevin A Johnson; Qiwen Mu; Emily L Grenesko; Steven J Laken; Mark S George
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2005-09-26       Impact factor: 13.382

7.  Telling truth from lie in individual subjects with fast event-related fMRI.

Authors:  Daniel D Langleben; James W Loughead; Warren B Bilker; Kosha Ruparel; Anna Rose Childress; Samantha I Busch; Ruben C Gur
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  On navigating the human cerebral cortex: response to 'in praise of tedious anatomy'.

Authors:  David C Van Essen; Donna Dierker
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-09-04       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  The roles of deception, intention to deceive, and motivation to avoid detection in the psychophysiological detection of guilty knowledge.

Authors:  J J Furedy; G Ben-Shakhar
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 4.016

10.  Mixed blocked/event-related designs separate transient and sustained activity in fMRI.

Authors:  Kristina M Visscher; Francis M Miezin; James E Kelly; Randy L Buckner; David I Donaldson; Mark P McAvoy; Vidya M Bhalodia; Steven E Petersen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  82 in total

1.  Using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) to detect the prefrontal cortical responses to deception under different motivations.

Authors:  Fang Li; Huilin Zhu; Qianqian Gao; Guixiong Xu; Xinge Li; Ziqiang Hu; Sailing He
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 3.732

2.  Can beneficial ends justify lying? Neural responses to the passive reception of lies and truth-telling with beneficial and harmful monetary outcomes.

Authors:  Lijun Yin; Bernd Weber
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-10       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Executive control- and reward-related neural processes associated with the opportunity to engage in voluntary dishonest moral decision making.

Authors:  Xiaoqing Hu; Narun Pornpattananangkul; Robin Nusslock
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  The effect of mental countermeasures on neuroimaging-based concealed information tests.

Authors:  Chun-Wei Hsu; Chiara Begliomini; Tommaso Dall'Acqua; Giorgio Ganis
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  The good lies: Altruistic goals modulate processing of deception in the anterior insula.

Authors:  Lijun Yin; Yang Hu; Dennis Dynowski; Jian Li; Bernd Weber
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-04-22       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Cognitive neuroscience of honesty and deception: A signaling framework.

Authors:  Adrianna Jenkins; Lusha Zhu; Ming Hsu
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2016-10

7.  I lie, why don't you: Neural mechanisms of individual differences in self-serving lying.

Authors:  Lijun Yin; Bernd Weber
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Elementary school children's cheating behavior and its cognitive correlates.

Authors:  Xiao Pan Ding; Danielle S Omrin; Angela D Evans; Genyue Fu; Guopeng Chen; Kang Lee
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2014-01-24

9.  Lying about the valence of affective pictures: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Tatia M C Lee; Tiffany M Y Lee; Adrian Raine; Chetwyn C H Chan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Do parkinsonian patients have trouble telling lies? The neurobiological basis of deceptive behaviour.

Authors:  Nobuhito Abe; Toshikatsu Fujii; Kazumi Hirayama; Atsushi Takeda; Yoshiyuki Hosokai; Toshiyuki Ishioka; Yoshiyuki Nishio; Kyoko Suzuki; Yasuto Itoyama; Shoki Takahashi; Hiroshi Fukuda; Etsuro Mori
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 13.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.