Literature DB >> 12169260

Meta-analysis of the functional neuroanatomy of single-word reading: method and validation.

Peter E Turkeltaub1, Guinevere F Eden, Karen M Jones, Thomas A Zeffiro.   

Abstract

Intersubject variability and subtle differences in experimental design can lead to variable results in studies of cognitive processes such as reading. To accurately identify the neural processes associated with cognition and sensorimotor processing, meta-analytic methods capable of identifying areas of consistent activation among studies are useful. This paper describes a novel approach for combining published neuroimaging results from multiple studies, designed to maximize the quantification of interstudy concordance while minimizing the subjective aspects of meta-analysis. In this method, a localization probability distribution was modeled for each activation focus obtained from 11 PET studies of reading single words aloud, and the union of these distributions was taken to yield an activation likelihood estimate map for the brain. Significance was assessed via permutation analysis of randomly generated sets of foci. Regions of significant concordance were identified in bilateral motor and superior temporal cortices, pre-SMA, left fusiform gyrus, and the cerebellum. These meta-analytic results were validated by comparison with new fMRI data on aloud word reading in normal adult subjects. Excellent correspondence between the two statistical maps was observed, with fMRI maxima lying close to all meta-analysis peaks and statistical values at the peaks identified by the two techniques correlating strongly. This close correspondence between PET meta-analysis and fMRI results also demonstrates the validity of using fMRI for the study of language tasks involving overt speech responses. Advantages of this automated meta-analysis technique include quantification of the level of concordance at all brain locations and the provision for use of a threshold for statistical significance of concordance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12169260     DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2002.1131

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  549 in total

Review 1.  Voxel-wise meta-analysis of fMRI studies in patients at clinical high risk for psychosis.

Authors:  Paolo Fusar-Poli
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 6.186

2.  Understanding the neural mechanisms involved in sensory control of voice production.

Authors:  Amy L Parkinson; Sabina G Flagmeier; Jordan L Manes; Charles R Larson; Bill Rogers; Donald A Robin
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-03-03       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Language-invariant verb processing regions in Spanish-English bilinguals.

Authors:  Joanna L Willms; Kevin A Shapiro; Marius V Peelen; Petra E Pajtas; Albert Costa; Lauren R Moo; Alfonso Caramazza
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-04-16       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Variability of fMRI activation during a phonological and semantic language task in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Mohamed L Seghier; François Lazeyras; Alan J Pegna; Jean-Marie Annoni; Ivan Zimine; Eugène Mayer; Christoph M Michel; Asaid Khateb
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  The left occipitotemporal cortex does not show preferential activity for words.

Authors:  Alecia C Vogel; Steven E Petersen; Bradley L Schlaggar
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis of brain correlates of placebo analgesia in human experimental pain.

Authors:  Martina Amanzio; Fabrizio Benedetti; Carlo A Porro; Sara Palermo; Franco Cauda
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Phoneme and word recognition in the auditory ventral stream.

Authors:  Iain DeWitt; Josef P Rauschecker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Coordinate-based activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis of neuroimaging data: a random-effects approach based on empirical estimates of spatial uncertainty.

Authors:  Simon B Eickhoff; Angela R Laird; Christian Grefkes; Ling E Wang; Karl Zilles; Peter T Fox
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Reversing the Standard Neural Signature of the Word-Nonword Distinction.

Authors:  William W Graves; Olga Boukrina; Samantha R Mattheiss; Edward J Alexander; Sylvain Baillet
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  The human amygdala and pain: evidence from neuroimaging.

Authors:  Laura E Simons; Eric A Moulton; Clas Linnman; Elizabeth Carpino; Lino Becerra; David Borsook
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.