Literature DB >> 12675401

The validity of psychophysiological detection of information with the Guilty Knowledge Test: a meta-analytic review.

Gershon Ben-Shakhar1, Eitan Elaad.   

Abstract

The authors performed a meta-analysis based on 169 conditions, gathered from 80 laboratory studies, to estimate the validity of the Guilty Knowledge Test (GKT) with the electrodermal measure. The overall average effect size was 1.55, but there were considerable variations among studies. In particular, mock-crime studies produced the highest average effect size (2.09). Three additional moderators were identified: Motivational instructions, deceptive ("no") verbal responses, and the use of at least 5 questions were associated with enhanced validity. Finally, a set of 10 studies that best approximated applications of the GKT under optimal conditions produced an average effect size of 3.12. The authors discuss factors that might limit the generalizability of these results and recommend further research of the GKT in realistic setups.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12675401     DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.1.131

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Psychol        ISSN: 0021-9010


  42 in total

1.  The revealing glance: eye gaze behavior to concealed information.

Authors:  Charlotte Schwedes; Dirk Wentura
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-05

2.  Covariations among fMRI, skin conductance, and behavioral data during processing of concealed information.

Authors:  Matthias Gamer; Thomas Bauermann; Peter Stoeter; Gerhard Vossel
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  The contributions of prefrontal cortex and executive control to deception: evidence from activation likelihood estimate meta-analyses.

Authors:  Shawn E Christ; David C Van Essen; Jason M Watson; Lindsay E Brubaker; Kathleen B McDermott
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2008-11-02       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 4.  [Lie detection and mind reading: is there a use for fMRI?: A critical survey and reflection].

Authors:  M Ruchsow; L Hermle; M Kober
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.214

5.  A new approach for concealed information identification based on ERP assessment.

Authors:  Min Zhao; Chongxun Zheng; Chunlin Zhao
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2011-04-16       Impact factor: 4.460

6.  Using analysis of speech and linguistics to characterize uncertainty in radiology reporting.

Authors:  Bruce I Reiner
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  Manipulating item proportion and deception reveals crucial dissociation between behavioral, autonomic, and neural indices of concealed information.

Authors:  Kristina Suchotzki; Bruno Verschuere; Judith Peth; Geert Crombez; Matthias Gamer
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  The dishonest mind set in sequence.

Authors:  Anna Foerster; Robert Wirth; Wilfried Kunde; Roland Pfister
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-06-15

9.  The contribution of mere recognition to the p300 effect in a concealed information test.

Authors:  Ewout H Meijer; Fren T Y Smulders; Ann Wolf
Journal:  Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback       Date:  2009-07-08

10.  Time and encoding effects in the concealed knowledge test.

Authors:  Travis L Seymour; Becky R Fraynt
Journal:  Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback       Date:  2009-06-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.