Literature DB >> 18979190

Life trajectories, genetic testing, and risk reduction decisions in 18-39 year old women at risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.

Rebekah Hamilton1, Janet K Williams, Barbara J Bowers, Kathleen Calzone.   

Abstract

This qualitative study identified four life trajectories that influenced the decision in young women to have genetic testing for mutations in BRCA1/2 and subsequent risk reduction decisions after receiving a positive mutation result. Fifty nine women between the ages of 18-39 years were interviewed in this grounded theory study, 44 of those tested were found to have a mutation in either BRCA1 or BRCA2. Of those with a mutation, 23 had no history of cancer and 21 had a breast cancer diagnosis. Analysis of the 44 participants tested found that risk reducing decisions were related to the life trajectories that preceded genetic testing. These life trajectories included: 1) Long-standing awareness of breast cancer in the family, 2) Loss of one's mother to breast cancer at a young age, 3) Expression of concern by a health care provider, and 4) Personal diagnosis of breast cancer. Understanding possible influences behind decision making for genetic testing and risk reduction in young women may assist health care providers in offering age appropriate guidance and support.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18979190      PMCID: PMC2834272          DOI: 10.1007/s10897-008-9200-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  40 in total

1.  Young women's experience of breast cancer: defining young and identifying concerns.

Authors:  J Dunn; S K Steginga
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2000 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.894

2.  Emerging adulthood. A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties.

Authors:  J J Arnett
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2000-05

3.  Discovering and addressing the client's lay construct of genetic disease: an important aspect of genetic healthcare?

Authors:  Heather Skirton; Christine Eiser
Journal:  Res Theory Nurs Pract       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 0.688

4.  Women's interest in genetic testing for breast cancer risk: the influence of sociodemographics and knowledge.

Authors:  Joan L Bottorff; Pamela A Ratner; Lynda G Balneaves; Chris G Richardson; Mary McCullum; Tom Hack; Karen Chalmers; Jane Buxton
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 5.  The importance of symbolic interaction in grounded theory research on women's health.

Authors:  D L Crooks
Journal:  Health Care Women Int       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb

6.  Cognitive representations of breast cancer, emotional distress and preventive health behaviour: a theoretical perspective.

Authors:  M Decruyenaere; G Evers-Kiebooms; M Welkenhuysen; L Denayer; E Claes
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.894

7.  Accommodating risk: responses to BRCA1/2 genetic testing of women who have had cancer.

Authors:  N Hallowell; C Foster; R Eeles; A Ardern-Jones; M Watson
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  Psychosocial problems among younger women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Nancy E Avis; Sybil Crawford; Janeen Manuel
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.894

9.  Then and now: quality of life of young breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Joan R Bloom; Susan L Stewart; Subo Chang; Priscilla J Banks
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.894

10.  Bilateral prophylactic mastectomy reduces breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: the PROSE Study Group.

Authors:  Timothy R Rebbeck; Tara Friebel; Henry T Lynch; Susan L Neuhausen; Laura van 't Veer; Judy E Garber; Gareth R Evans; Steven A Narod; Claudine Isaacs; Ellen Matloff; Mary B Daly; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Barbara L Weber
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-02-23       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  28 in total

1.  Comparing family members' motivations and attitudes towards genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: a qualitative analysis.

Authors:  Caroline Dancyger; Jonathan A Smith; Chris Jacobs; Melissa Wallace; Susan Michie
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 2.  Impact of presymptomatic genetic testing on young adults: a systematic review.

Authors:  Lea Godino; Daniela Turchetti; Leigh Jackson; Catherine Hennessy; Heather Skirton
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  Grounded theory in genetic counseling research: an interpretive perspective.

Authors:  Robin E Grubs; Maria Piantanida
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-02-02       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Presymptomatic genetic testing for hereditary cancer in young adults: a survey of young adults and parents.

Authors:  Lea Godino; Daniela Turchetti; Leigh Jackson; Catherine Hennessy; Heather Skirton
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 4.246

5.  Is chronic hepatitis C virus infection a risk factor for breast cancer?

Authors:  Dominique Larrey; Marie-Cécile Bozonnat; Ihab Kain; Georges-Philippe Pageaux; Eric Assenat
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-08-07       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Heightened perception of breast cancer risk in young women at risk of familial breast cancer.

Authors:  Rachael Glassey; Moira O'Connor; Angela Ives; Christobel Saunders; Sarah O'Sullivan; Sarah J Hardcastle
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 2.375

7.  Families' experience of oncogenetic counselling: accounts from a heterogeneous hereditary cancer risk population.

Authors:  Álvaro Mendes; Liliana Sousa
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.375

8.  Quality of life and autonomy in emerging adults with early-onset neuromuscular disorders.

Authors:  Darcy J Huismann; Jane P Sheldon; Beverly M Yashar; Kimberly Amburgey; James J Dowling; Elizabeth M Petty
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-02-25       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  SI RLTD: Risk Scores and Decision Making: The Anatomy of a Decision to Reduce Breast Cancer Risk.

Authors:  Christine Holmberg; Mary Daly; Worta McCaskill-Stevens
Journal:  J Nurs Healthc Chronic Illn       Date:  2010-12

Review 10.  Family Communication, Risk Perception and Cancer Knowledge of Young Adults from BRCA1/2 Families: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Alison L Young; Phyllis N Butow; Janine Vetsch; Veronica F Quinn; Andrea F Patenaude; Katherine M Tucker; Claire E Wakefield
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 2.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.