Literature DB >> 27668072

Predictors of suboptimal bowel preparation in asymptomatic patients undergoing average-risk screening colonoscopy.

Shail M Govani1, Eric E Elliott1, Stacy B Menees1, Stephanie L Judd1, Sameer D Saini1, Constantinos P Anastassiades1, Annette L Urganus1, Suzanna J Boyce1, Philip S Schoenfeld1.   

Abstract

AIM: To identify risk factors for a suboptimal preparation among a population undergoing screening or surveillance colonoscopy.
METHODS: Retrospective review of the University of Michigan and Veteran's Administration (VA) Hospital records from 2009 to identify patients age 50 and older who underwent screening or surveillance procedure and had resection of polyps less than 1 cm in size and no more than 2 polyps. Patients with inflammatory bowel disease or a family history of colorectal cancer were excluded. Suboptimal procedures were defined as procedure preparations categorized as fair, poor or inadequate by the endoscopist. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of suboptimal preparation.
RESULTS: Of 4427 colonoscopies reviewed, 2401 met our inclusion criteria and were analyzed. Of our population, 16% had a suboptimal preparation. African Americans were 70% more likely to have a suboptimal preparation (95%CI: 1.2-2.4). Univariable analysis revealed that narcotic and tricyclic antidepressants (TCA) use, diabetes, prep type, site (VA vs non-VA), and presence of a gastroenterology (GI) fellow were associated with suboptimal prep quality. In a multivariable model controlling for gender, age, ethnicity, procedure site and presence of a GI fellow, diabetes [odds ratio (OR) = 2.3; 95%CI: 1.6-3.2], TCA use (OR = 2.5; 95%CI: 1.3-4.9), narcotic use (OR = 1.7; 95%CI: 1.2-2.5) and Miralax-Gatorade prep vs 4L polyethylene glycol 3350 (OR = 0.6; 95%CI: 0.4-0.9) were associated with a suboptimal prep quality.
CONCLUSION: Diabetes, narcotics use and TCA use were identified as predictors of poor preparation in screening colonoscopies while Miralax-Gatorade preps were associated with better bowel preparation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colonoscopy; Diabetes; Narcotics; Preparation; Quality

Year:  2016        PMID: 27668072      PMCID: PMC5027032          DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v8.i17.616

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc


  17 in total

1.  Racial differences in colorectal cancer mortality. The importance of stage and socioeconomic status.

Authors:  S Marcella; J E Miller
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  How many endoscopies are performed for colorectal cancer screening? Results from CDC's survey of endoscopic capacity.

Authors:  Laura C Seeff; Thomas B Richards; Jean A Shapiro; Marion R Nadel; Diane L Manninen; Leslie S Given; Fred B Dong; Linda D Winges; Matthew T McKenna
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Afternoon colonoscopies have higher failure rates than morning colonoscopies.

Authors:  Madhusudhan R Sanaka; Nirav Shah; Kevin D Mullen; D R Ferguson; Charles Thomas; Arthur J McCullough
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  The impact of colon cleanliness assessment on endoscopists' recommendations for follow-up colonoscopy.

Authors:  Shomron Ben-Horin; Simon Bar-Meir; Benjamin Avidan
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 10.864

5.  Predictors of inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy.

Authors:  R M Ness; R Manam; H Hoen; N Chalasani
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 10.864

6.  Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study.

Authors:  Florian Froehlich; Vincent Wietlisbach; Jean-Jacques Gonvers; Bernard Burnand; John-Paul Vader
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  Cost-analysis model of colonoscopy preparation using split-dose reduced-volume oral sulfate solution (OSS) and polyethylene glycol with electrolytes solution (PEG-ELS).

Authors:  Lynn Huynh; Sander Yermakov; Matthew Davis; Romaine Campbell; Mark Cleveland; Francis A Farraye; Mihran Yenikomshian
Journal:  J Med Econ       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 2.448

8.  Impact of bowel preparation on efficiency and cost of colonoscopy.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex; Thomas F Imperiale; Danielle R Latinovich; L Lisa Bratcher
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 10.864

9.  Impact of obesity on bowel preparation for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Brian B Borg; Nitin K Gupta; Gary R Zuckerman; Bhaskar Banerjee; C Prakash Gyawali
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 11.382

10.  Bowel preparation for colonoscopy with magnesium sulphate and low-volume polyethylene glycol.

Authors:  Bojan Tepeš; Dominika N Mlakar; Tanja Metličar
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.566

View more
  3 in total

1.  Augmentation with pre-emptive macrogol-based osmotic laxative does not significantly improve standard bowel preparation in unselected patients: A randomized trial.

Authors:  Dileep Mangira; Shara Ket; Jeremy Dwyer; Robyn Secomb; John Reynolds; Gregor Brown
Journal:  JGH Open       Date:  2019-04-04

2.  A patient-centered framework for health systems engineering in gastroenterology: improving inpatient colonoscopy bowel preparation.

Authors:  Alexandra T Strauss; Jennifer Yeh; Diego A Martinez; Gayane Yenokyan; Janet Yoder; Ravi Nehra; Tara Feller; Kathy Bull-Henry; Ellen Stein; Lawrence C H Hsu; Haitham Al-Grain; Candice Zabko; Christopher Fain
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-02-27       Impact factor: 3.067

3.  A European, multicentre, observational, post-authorisation safety study of oral sulphate solution: compliance and safety.

Authors:  Jaroslaw Regula; Manon C W Spaander; Stepan Suchanek; Anne Kornowski; Valerie Perrot; Wolfgang Fischbach
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2020-02-21
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.