Literature DB >> 18978054

A genomic distance based on MUM indicates discontinuity between most bacterial species and genera.

Marc Deloger1, Meriem El Karoui, Marie-Agnès Petit.   

Abstract

The fundamental unit of biological diversity is the species. However, a remarkable extent of intraspecies diversity in bacteria was discovered by genome sequencing, and it reveals the need to develop clear criteria to group strains within a species. Two main types of analyses used to quantify intraspecies variation at the genome level are the average nucleotide identity (ANI), which detects the DNA conservation of the core genome, and the DNA content, which calculates the proportion of DNA shared by two genomes. Both estimates are based on BLAST alignments for the definition of DNA sequences common to the genome pair. Interestingly, however, results using these methods on intraspecies pairs are not well correlated. This prompted us to develop a genomic-distance index taking into account both criteria of diversity, which are based on DNA maximal unique matches (MUM) shared by two genomes. The values, called MUMi, for MUM index, correlate better with the ANI than with the DNA content. Moreover, the MUMi groups strains in a way that is congruent with routinely used multilocus sequence-typing trees, as well as with ANI-based trees. We used the MUMi to determine the relatedness of all available genome pairs at the species and genus levels. Our analysis reveals a certain consistency in the current notion of bacterial species, in that the bulk of intraspecies and intragenus values are clearly separable. It also confirms that some species are much more diverse than most. As the MUMi is fast to calculate, it offers the possibility of measuring genome distances on the whole database of available genomes.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18978054      PMCID: PMC2612450          DOI: 10.1128/JB.01202-08

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bacteriol        ISSN: 0021-9193            Impact factor:   3.490


  31 in total

Review 1.  The species concept for prokaryotes.

Authors:  R Rosselló-Mora; R Amann
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 16.408

2.  Genome sequence of Vibrio parahaemolyticus: a pathogenic mechanism distinct from that of V cholerae.

Authors:  Kozo Makino; Kenshiro Oshima; Ken Kurokawa; Katsushi Yokoyama; Takayuki Uda; Kenichi Tagomori; Yoshio Iijima; Masatomo Najima; Masayuki Nakano; Atsushi Yamashita; Yoshino Kubota; Shigenobu Kimura; Teruo Yasunaga; Takeshi Honda; Hideo Shinagawa; Masahira Hattori; Tetsuya Iida
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-03-01       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 3.  Alignment-free sequence comparison-a review.

Authors:  Susana Vinga; Jonas Almeida
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2003-03-01       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Efficient multiple genome alignment.

Authors:  Michael Höhl; Stefan Kurtz; Enno Ohlebusch
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  DNACompress: fast and effective DNA sequence compression.

Authors:  Xin Chen; Ming Li; Bin Ma; John Tromp
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  Mauve: multiple alignment of conserved genomic sequence with rearrangements.

Authors:  Aaron C E Darling; Bob Mau; Frederick R Blattner; Nicole T Perna
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput.

Authors:  Robert C Edgar
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-03-19       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Complete genome sequence of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 and genomic comparison with a laboratory strain K-12.

Authors:  T Hayashi; K Makino; M Ohnishi; K Kurokawa; K Ishii; K Yokoyama; C G Han; E Ohtsubo; K Nakayama; T Murata; M Tanaka; T Tobe; T Iida; H Takami; T Honda; C Sasakawa; N Ogasawara; T Yasunaga; S Kuhara; T Shiba; M Hattori; H Shinagawa
Journal:  DNA Res       Date:  2001-02-28       Impact factor: 4.458

9.  Bacterial genomes as new gene homes: the genealogy of ORFans in E. coli.

Authors:  Vincent Daubin; Howard Ochman
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 9.043

10.  Versatile and open software for comparing large genomes.

Authors:  Stefan Kurtz; Adam Phillippy; Arthur L Delcher; Michael Smoot; Martin Shumway; Corina Antonescu; Steven L Salzberg
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2004-01-30       Impact factor: 13.583

View more
  57 in total

1.  Separating significant matches from spurious matches in DNA sequences.

Authors:  Hugo Devillers; Sophie Schbath
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 1.479

2.  A de Bruijn graph approach to the quantification of closely-related genomes in a microbial community.

Authors:  Mingjie Wang; Yuzhen Ye; Haixu Tang
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.479

3.  It is computation time for bacteriology!

Authors:  Igor B Zhulin
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  A catalog of microbial genes from the bovine rumen unveils a specialized and diverse biomass-degrading environment.

Authors:  Junhua Li; Huanzi Zhong; Yuliaxis Ramayo-Caldas; Nicolas Terrapon; Vincent Lombard; Gabrielle Potocki-Veronese; Jordi Estellé; Milka Popova; Ziyi Yang; Hui Zhang; Fang Li; Shanmei Tang; Fangming Yang; Weineng Chen; Bing Chen; Jiyang Li; Jing Guo; Cécile Martin; Emmanuelle Maguin; Xun Xu; Huanming Yang; Jian Wang; Lise Madsen; Karsten Kristiansen; Bernard Henrissat; Stanislav D Ehrlich; Diego P Morgavi
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 6.524

5.  Investigation of the evolutionary development of the genus Bifidobacterium by comparative genomics.

Authors:  Gabriele Andrea Lugli; Christian Milani; Francesca Turroni; Sabrina Duranti; Chiara Ferrario; Alice Viappiani; Leonardo Mancabelli; Marta Mangifesta; Bernard Taminiau; Véronique Delcenserie; Douwe van Sinderen; Marco Ventura
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Characterization of epidemic IncI1-Iγ plasmids harboring ambler class A and C genes in Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica from animals and humans.

Authors:  Hilde Smith; Alex Bossers; Frank Harders; Guanghui Wu; Neil Woodford; Stefan Schwarz; Beatriz Guerra; Irene Rodríguez; Alieda van Essen-Zandbergen; Michael Brouwer; Dik Mevius
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Transformable facultative thermophile Geobacillus stearothermophilus NUB3621 as a host strain for metabolic engineering.

Authors:  Kristen Blanchard; Srebrenka Robic; Ichiro Matsumura
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Small variable segments constitute a major type of diversity of bacterial genomes at the species level.

Authors:  Fabrice Touzain; Erick Denamur; Claudine Médigue; Valérie Barbe; Meriem El Karoui; Marie-Agnès Petit
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2010-04-30       Impact factor: 13.583

9.  Detection of low-abundance bacterial strains in metagenomic datasets by eigengenome partitioning.

Authors:  Brian Cleary; Ilana Lauren Brito; Katherine Huang; Dirk Gevers; Terrance Shea; Sarah Young; Eric J Alm
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 54.908

10.  Diversity of Haloquadratum and other haloarchaea in three, geographically distant, Australian saltern crystallizer ponds.

Authors:  Dickson Oh; Kate Porter; Brendan Russ; David Burns; Mike Dyall-Smith
Journal:  Extremophiles       Date:  2009-12-20       Impact factor: 2.395

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.