Literature DB >> 18975703

Automatic exposure control in pediatric and adult multidetector CT examinations: a phantom study on dose reduction and image quality.

Antonios E Papadakis1, Kostas Perisinakis, John Damilakis.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the potential of a modern x,y,z modulation-based automatic exposure control system (AEC) for dose reduction in pediatric and adult multidetector CT (MDCT) imaging and evaluate the quality of the images obtained. Five physical anthropomorphic phantoms that simulate the average individual as neonate, 1-, 5-, 10-year old child, and adult were scanned with a MDCT scanner, equipped with a modern AEC system. Dose reduction (%DR) was calculated as the percentage difference of the mean modulated and the preset tube current-time product that is prescribed for standard head and body scan protocols. The effect of the tube potential and the orientation of the topogram acquisition on dose reduction were assessed. Image quality was evaluated on the basis of image noise and signal to noise ratio (SNR). The dose reduction values achieved in pediatric phantoms were remarkably lower than those achieved for the adult. The efficiency of the AEC is decreased at 80 kVp compared to higher tube potentials and for helical scans following an anterior posterior (AP-AEC) compared to a lateral (LAT-AEC) topogram acquisition. In AP-AEC scans, the dose reduction ranged between 4.7 and 34.7% for neonate, 15.4 and 30.9% for 1 year old, 3.1 and 26.7% for 5 years old, 1.2 and 58.7% for 10 years old, and 15.5 and 57.4% for adult. In LAT-AEC scans, the corresponding dose reduction ranged between 11.0 and 36.5%, 27.2 and 35.7%, 11.3 and 35.6%, 0.3 and 67.0%, and 15.0 and 61.7%, respectively. AP-AEC scans resulted in a 17.1% and 19.7% dose increase in the thorax of neonate and the pelvis of the 10-year old phantom, respectively. The variation in the measured noise among images obtained along the scanning z axis was lower in AEC activated compared to fixed milliamperes scans. However, image noise was significantly increased (P<.001) and SNR significantly decreased (P<.001) in most AEC activated compared to fixed milliamperes scans. In conclusion, AEC resulted in a (i) substantial dose reduction, which is less pronounced in children compared to adult, (ii) higher dose reduction in scans following a lateral compared to scans following an anterior-posterior topogram acquisition, (iii) increase of image noise and degradation of SNR in the obtained images compared to the fixed milliamperes technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18975703     DOI: 10.1118/1.2977535

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  21 in total

1.  Image quality and dose optimisation for infant CT using a paediatric phantom.

Authors:  Jack W Lambert; Andrew S Phelps; Jesse L Courtier; Robert G Gould; John D MacKenzie
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Auto exposure control (AEC) modality in CBCT devices: Revisiting the reported parameters in current orthodontic literature.

Authors:  Arash Poorsattar Bejeh Mir
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2015-08-01

3.  Dose reduction with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction for paediatric CT: phantom study and clinical experience on chest and abdomen CT.

Authors:  F Gay; Y Pavia; N Pierrat; S Lasalle; S Neuenschwander; H J Brisse
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Automatic exposure control in CT: the effect of patient size, anatomical region and prescribed modulation strength on tube current and image quality.

Authors:  Antonios E Papadakis; Kostas Perisinakis; John Damilakis
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Investigating the CT localizer radiograph: acquisition parameters, patient centring and their combined influence on radiation dose.

Authors:  J W Lambert; S Kumar; J S Chen; Z J Wang; R G Gould; B M Yeh
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Evaluating the impact of scan settings on automatic tube current modulation in CT using a novel phantom.

Authors:  Deborah Merzan; Patrik Nowik; Gavin Poludniowski; Robert Bujila
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Differences in behavior of tube current modulation techniques for thoracic CT examinations between male and female anthropomorphic phantoms.

Authors:  Kosuke Matsubara; Pei-Jan Paul Lin; Atsushi Fukuda; Kichiro Koshida
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2014-05-27

8.  Impact of the scout view orientation on the radiation exposure and image quality in thoracic and abdominal CT.

Authors:  S Suntharalingam; A Wetter; N Guberina; J Theysohn; A Ringelstein; T Schlosser; M Forsting; K Nassenstein
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  CT dose modulation using automatic exposure control in whole-body PET/CT: effects of scout imaging direction and arm positioning.

Authors:  Yusuke Inoue; Kazunori Nagahara; Hiroko Kudo; Hiroyasu Itoh
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-04-25

10.  MR arthrography of the shoulder: tolerance evaluation of four different injection techniques.

Authors:  Evangelos Perdikakis; Eleni Drakonaki; Thomas Maris; Apostolos Karantanas
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2012-10-14       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.