Literature DB >> 23556604

Recognition of speech in noise after application of time-frequency masks: dependence on frequency and threshold parameters.

Donal G Sinex1.   

Abstract

Binary time-frequency (TF) masks can be applied to separate speech from noise. Previous studies have shown that with appropriate parameters, ideal TF masks can extract highly intelligible speech even at very low speech-to-noise ratios (SNRs). Two psychophysical experiments provided additional information about the dependence of intelligibility on the frequency resolution and threshold criteria that define the ideal TF mask. Listeners identified AzBio Sentences in noise, before and after application of TF masks. Masks generated with 8 or 16 frequency bands per octave supported nearly-perfect identification. Word recognition accuracy was slightly lower and more variable with 4 bands per octave. When TF masks were generated with a local threshold criterion of 0 dB SNR, the mean speech reception threshold was -9.5 dB SNR, compared to -5.7 dB for unprocessed sentences in noise. Speech reception thresholds decreased by about 1 dB per dB of additional decrease in the local threshold criterion. Information reported here about the dependence of speech intelligibility on frequency and level parameters has relevance for the development of non-ideal TF masks for clinical applications such as speech processing for hearing aids.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23556604      PMCID: PMC3631261          DOI: 10.1121/1.4792143

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  21 in total

1.  On the number of channels needed to understand speech.

Authors:  P C Loizou; M Dorman; Z Tu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Prevalence of stereotypical responses to mistuned complex tones in the inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Donal G Sinex; Hongzhe Li; David S Velenovsky
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-08-03       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Isolating the energetic component of speech-on-speech masking with ideal time-frequency segregation.

Authors:  Douglas S Brungart; Peter S Chang; Brian D Simpson; DeLiang Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Determination of the potential benefit of time-frequency gain manipulation.

Authors:  Michael C Anzalone; Lauren Calandruccio; Karen A Doherty; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 5.  Digital noise reduction: an overview.

Authors:  Ruth Bentler; Li-Kuei Chiou
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2006-06

Review 6.  Hearing loss and the limits of amplification.

Authors:  Christopher W Turner
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2006-10-06       Impact factor: 1.854

7.  Aging and speech-on-speech masking.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Richard L Freyman
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Factors influencing intelligibility of ideal binary-masked speech: implications for noise reduction.

Authors:  Ning Li; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  A "rationalized" arcsine transform.

Authors:  G A Studebaker
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1985-09

10.  Speech-reception threshold for sentences as a function of age and noise level.

Authors:  R Plomp; A M Mimpen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  4 in total

1.  Speech-cue transmission by an algorithm to increase consonant recognition in noise for hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Eric W Healy; Sarah E Yoho; Yuxuan Wang; Frédéric Apoux; DeLiang Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The optimal threshold for removing noise from speech is similar across normal and impaired hearing-a time-frequency masking study.

Authors:  Eric W Healy; Jordan L Vasko; DeLiang Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  An ideal quantized mask to increase intelligibility and quality of speech in noise.

Authors:  Eric W Healy; Jordan L Vasko
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Masked sentence recognition assessed at ascending target-to-masker ratios: modest effects of repeating stimuli.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Lauren Calandruccio; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.